EQUIPPING STUDENTS FOR A DYNAMIC FUTURE

Received: 8th April 2024 Revised: 17th May 2024, 21st May 2024 & 30th May 2024 Accepted: 22nd April 2024

Authors

  • David Ramamonjisoa Faculty of Software and Information Science, Iwate Prefectural University, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2024.82.3248

Abstract

The ever-changing landscape of the 21st century requires a shift in educational focus beyond traditional subject knowledge. This paper explores key considerations for designing effective curricula, emphasising the crucial role of basic skills and 21st-century competencies, fostering a lifelong learning mindset, and preparing students for an increasingly interconnected world.

Building strong literacy, numeracy, and digital skills is the foundation for communicating effectively, thinking critically, and navigating the digital world. Developing key 21st-century skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and communication will enable students to tackle complex challenges, work effectively in teams, and express themselves clearly.

Encouraging creativity, innovation, and adaptability enables students to think outside the box, embrace new ideas, and thrive in an unpredictable future. Fostering a growth mindset and self-directed learning skills empowers them for lifelong learning and continuous skill development.

While subject-specific knowledge remains valuable, this paper emphasises the need for a holistic approach that integrates these essential skills and mindsets. In addition,recognizing the importance of social-emotional learning and global citizenship highlights the need to prepare well-rounded individuals for success in an interconnected world. This includes understanding diverse cultures, promoting responsible global citizenship, and encouraging sustainable practices.

By incorporating these elements into curriculum design, we can equip students with the skills and attitudes necessary to navigate the complexities of the future, become responsible, engaged, and lifelong learners, and contribute meaningfully to a globalised society.

References

Bray, E. (2004). Japanese Higher Education Internationalization Policy: 1983-2003.Yokkaichi University Journal of Environmental and Information Sciences. 2004

https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778813

Husen, T. & Coombs, P. (1986). The world crisis in education: the view from the eighties.

The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 57, 1986. 673-674.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778813

Irving, C., Hall, H. & Brettle, A. (2015). How Can Information Literacy be modelled from a lifelong learning perspective? Information, Interaction, and Impact Conference. Aberdeen, 2015.

https://slideplayer.com/slide/7012565/

Lee, P., Goldberg, C. & Kohane, I. (2023). The AI Revolution in Medicine: GPT-4 and Beyond. Pearson Publisher. ISBN 9780138200046.

https://www.pearson.ch/the-ai-revolution-in-medicine-gpt-4-and-beyond-9780138200138

Lehman, E., Thompson Leighton, F., & Meyer, A. R. (2017). Mathematics for Computer Science. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. https://archive.org/details/MCS_LLM

Li, Q., Fu, L., Zhang, W., Chen X., Yu J., Xia W., Zhang W., Tang, R.& Yu, Y. (2023), Adapting Large Language Models for Education: Foundational Capabilities, Potentials, and Challenges, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08664, 2023 arxiv.org

Lo, C.K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 50, 2824-2838.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861

Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009

Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms, Journal of Futures, vol. 90, 2017, 46-60, ISSN 0016-3287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006

Meyer, J.G., Urbanowicz, R.J., Martin, P., O’Connor, K., Li, R., Peng, P., Bright, T.J., Tatonetti, N.P., Won, K., Gonzalez-Hernandez, G., & Moore, J.H. (2023). ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges. BioData Mining, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9

Omoto Y. (2024), Japanese universities set to raise foreign student tuition. Nikkei Asia, March 4 2024.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Education/Japanese-universities-set-to-raise-foreign-student-tuition

Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006), Critical Thinking. Learn the Tools the Best Thinkers Use. Pearson Prentice Hall Publisher.

https://archive.org/details/criticalthinking0000paul_y5h1

Ryan, J. (2013), Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students. Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. Routledge Publisher.

https://www.routledge.com/Cross-Cultural-Teaching-and-Learning-for-Home-and-International-Students-Internationalisation-of-Pedagogy-and-Curriculum-in-Higher-Education/Ryan/p/book/9780415630139

Saito, K. & Kim, S. (2019), Internationalization of Japanese Higher Education: Effective Organization of Internationally Cooperative Higher Education Programs, Higher Learning Research Communications Journal, vol. 9, num. 1, June 2019. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1221251.pdf

Shimokawa, M. (2022), Now admitting: Japan aims to regain 300,000 foreign students, Nikkei Asia, June 22 2022.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Education/Now-admitting-Japan-aims-to-regain-300-000-foreign-students

Silva, C.A., Ramos, F.N., de Moraes, R.V., & Santos, E.L. (2024). ChatGPT: Challenges and Benefits in Software Programming for Higher Education. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031245

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

How to Cite

Ramamonjisoa, D. (2024). EQUIPPING STUDENTS FOR A DYNAMIC FUTURE: Received: 8th April 2024 Revised: 17th May 2024, 21st May 2024 & 30th May 2024 Accepted: 22nd April 2024. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 8(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2024.82.3248