INTERVENTION PROCEDURE IN DRAWING CLASSES FOR NON-ART UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: THE IMPACT OF ASSIGNMENT REDESIGN ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Dimitrije Curcic Prince of Songkla University International College, Hat Yai, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2024.150-168

Abstract

Drawing allows students to actively engage with the topic they are learning, as opposed to only taking knowledge passively (Abdullah et.al., 2023). The endeavor to teach fundamental freehand drawing techniques to non-art university students poses distinct challenges necessitating the adaptation of specific instructional methodologies. This study investigates the impact of assignment design as a part of instructional methods in a freehand drawing course tailored for non-art students and its consequent effects on student performance. Employing a multifaceted data collection methodology involving intervention, post-intervention analysis, and self-reflection questionnaires about students' perceptions of the learning process, the study seeks to elucidate which interventions in instructional procedure are efficient in improving students’ overall performance. The study cohort comprises 63 second-year students drawn from diverse faculties at Prince of Songkla University in Hat Yai, Thailand, encompassing eleven students from the first semester and fifty-two from the second semester of the academic year 2023. Through visual analysis post-intervention, informed by standardized rubric score criteria, the findings evince a significant correlation between assignment themes and student performance. Furthermore, discernible enhancements across various assignment categories suggest a marked improvement in learning outcomes attributable to the redesigned assignments implemented in the second semester compared to their counterparts in the first semester of the academic year 2023.

References

Abdullah, M., Khairani, M. Z., Amos, F. V., Aziz, M. N. A., & Zailuddin, M. F. N. O. (2023). An Expanded Drawing Terminology from the Arts and Design Perspective for Higher Education and Professionals. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 1331–1340.

Aguilar, N. K., & Azpeitia, J. L. H. (2013). Teaching and evaluation strategies for drawing in design education: The use of drawing schemata as a tool for the in-class development of drawing for design. iDRS // CUMULUS 2013, 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, Oslo, 14–17 May 2013, Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2013.001

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK), The Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Budiman, H., Numan, I., & Idham, N. C. (2021). Freehand Drawing and Architectural Expression. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol5.iss1.art5

Ching, F. D., & Juroszek, S. P. (2018). Design Drawing (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

Ergashev, M. & Raxmonov, I.A. (2022). Methods of Using Innovative Technologies in the Teaching of Drawing in the Continuous Education System. American Journal of Technology and Applied Sciences, 5, 41–45. Retrieved from https://americanjournal.org/index.php/ajtas/article/view/144

Felip-Miralles, F., & Navarro-Lizandra, J. L. (2018). Enhancing Freehand Sketching in Industrial Design: Description and Implementation of a Drawing Methodology for More Effective Representations. The International Journal of Design Education, 13(1), 37–58. doi:10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v13i01/37-58.

Ishibashi, K., & Okada, T. (2004). How Copying Artwork Affects Students’ Artistic Creativity. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 26(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bq69315

Marji, M., Musta’amal, A., Chidozie, C., & Hassan, S. (2023). An Action Research on The Effect of Using Real Modeled Object in Teaching Orthographic Drawing Concepts on Students’ Performance. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2248

Melges, M. (2015). The Significance of Freehand Drawing in the Teaching Process in General Construction Project Classes (Publication No. 4-A) [PHD Dissertation, The Institute of Building Design, Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology.]. http://repozytorium.biblos.pk.edu.pl/resources/35432

Mittler, G. A. (2006). Art in Focus (Interactive student ed., pp. 57–65). Glencoe/McGraw-Hill. https://www.academia.edu/29657567/Mittler_Art_in_Focus_comprehensive_textbook_theory_history_Glencoe_2006_pdf

Rosenshine, B. V. (1997). Advances in Research on Instruction. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameanui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in Educating Students with Disabilities (pp. 197–221). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-17

How to Cite

Curcic, D. (2024). INTERVENTION PROCEDURE IN DRAWING CLASSES FOR NON-ART UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: THE IMPACT OF ASSIGNMENT REDESIGN ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 150–168. https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2024.150-168