A MISMATCH OF IDEALS: THE AILS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION POLICY IN SOUTH KOREA

Received: 2nd May 2022; Revised: 3rd June 2022, 6th June 2022, 24th June 2022; Accepted: 7th October 2022

Authors

  • Michael P Simon Foreign Language Education Center, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2022.63.1528

Keywords:

Educational Aims, Foreign Language Aims, ESL, English Education Policy, English Ideologies

Abstract

Despite several modifications in English education policy over many years in South Korea, there seems to be no discernable improvement in language ability. This problem has been investigated empirically by researchers domestically and internationally, with no consensus as to the underlying issue. This paper attempts to pivot the discussion to a more philosophical position by approaching the issue from a policy viewpoint. The overall aims of education, foreign language learning aims, as well as South Korea’s relationship with English education is examined. The fundamental concern is the mismatch between how society views English to how English education policy is enacted. Specific suggestions are then made regarding the ways in which policy makers can adjust their approaches to meet the needs of societal expectations of English proficiency. It is hoped that from a narrowing of insight from the macro-view of education at large to the specific problem in Korea will lead to changes in policy for the better.

References

Beard, M. (2018). Language as currency: Perpetuating and contesting notions of English as power in globalized Korean contexts. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 10, 19-25.

Bottery, M. (2000). Education, Policy, and Ethics. Continuum.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Brown, R. A. (1990). English education in Korea. Asian and Pacific Quarterly of Culture and Social Affairs, 12(4), 57-67.

Byram, M. (2008). From Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship: Essays and Reflections. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690807

Cameron, D. (2002). Globalization and the teaching of ‘communication skills’. In D. Block, & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and Language Teaching (pp. 67-82). Routledge.

Cohen, M. (2018). From ‘Glittering gibberish’ to the ‘Mere jabbering’ of a Bonne: The problem of the ‘Oral’ in the learning and teaching of French in eighteeth- and nineteenth-century England. In N. McLelland & R. Smith (Eds.), The History of Language Learning and Teaching: Volume II (pp. 1-20). Legenda. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16km1gp.4

Harris, K. (1999). Aims! Whose aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 1-13). Routledge.

Hirst, P. H. (1999). The nature of educational aims. R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 123-132). Routledge.

Jang, Y. J. (2020). How to improve the effects of foreign language education in Korea and China: Focusing on the improvement of foreign language education policy. Social Sciences and Humanities Open. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595141

Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2017). Secondary teachers’ perception on English education policies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.1.4.47

Jung, J. (2020). The fourth industrial revolution, knowledge production and higher education in South Korea. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(2), 134-156.

Lee, C. H. (2021). A Historical-Structural Approach to ESL Ideology in Korea. English Teaching, 76(1), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.76.1.202103.79

Martin, C. (2011). The good, the worthwhile and the obligatory: Practical reason and moral universalism in R. S. Peters’ conception of education. In S. Cuypers, & C. Martin (Eds.), Reading R. S. Peters Today Analysis, Ethics, and the Aims of Education. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444346497.ch9

Moore, T. W. (2010). Philosophy of Education: An Introduction (International Library of the Philosophy of Education Volume 14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861103

Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of Education. Continuum.

Standish, P. (1999). Education without aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 35-49). Routledge.

Standish, P. (2014). What’s the use of philosophy of education? In D. Lewin, A. Guilherme, & M. White (Eds.), New Perspectives in Philosophy of Education (pp. 11-28). Bloomsbury.

White, J. (2010). The Aims of Education Restated (International Library of the Philosophy of Education Volume 22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861011

Williams, K. (1991). Modern languages in the school curriculum: a philosophical view. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 25(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1991.tb00645.x

Winch, C. (1999). Autonomy as an educational aim. In R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education pp. 74-83. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-15

How to Cite

Simon, M. P. (2022). A MISMATCH OF IDEALS: THE AILS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION POLICY IN SOUTH KOREA: Received: 2nd May 2022; Revised: 3rd June 2022, 6th June 2022, 24th June 2022; Accepted: 7th October 2022. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 6(3), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2022.63.1528