DOES SUBJECT CHOICE IN A JOINT HONOURS DEGREE AFFECT HIGHLY SKILLED GRADUATE EMPLOYMENT?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2017.12.93114Keywords:
Joint Honours Degree, Combined Honours Degree, Graduate Employment, CareersAbstract
Joint or combined honours degrees in the UK generally permit students to study two subjects to full bachelors degree depth, by studying half the curriculum content of the respective equivalent single honours degrees. This affords students the opportunity to study a more diverse curriculum that they feel passionate about. However this is at the expense of breadth of study in each particular subject, which is a strong defining feature of the majority of UK single honours degrees. Does the decision to study certain subjects in a joint or combined honours degree affect the graduate’s subsequent highly skilled graduate employment? The literature is weak in examining this, either for joint honours subjects generally or for specific combinations of subjects. This paper presents an analysis of the UK Destination of Leavers from Higher Education survey between 2011/12 and 2014/15 at the level of the individual combinations studied – a national dataset which has not previously been critiqued in this particular way in the public domain. This analysis will determine whether certain combinations lend themselves to higher rates of highly skilled graduate employment, irrespective of other factors affecting employment, for example the characteristics of different universities. We conclude that subject choice greatly affects graduate employment, and we present recommendations around the preparedness or otherwise of graduates for highly skilled graduate employment, as determined by their choice of subjects to study.
References
Bolton, P. (2016). Tuition Fee Statistics. The Commons Library. Retrieved from http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN00917. [Accessed 27 June 2017]
Browne, J. (2010). Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/422565/bis-10-1208-securing-sustainable-higher-education-browne-report.pdf. [Accessed 27 June 2017]
BIS. (2010). Higher Education Funding for 2011-12 and Beyond. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-funding-for-2011-12-and-beyond. [Accessed 27 June 2017]
CBI. (2015). Inspiring Growth, CBI/Pearson Education and Skills Survey 2015. Retrieved from http://www.cbi.org.uk/index.cfm/_api/render/file/?method=inline&fileID=92095A98-3A90-4FBD-9AF891997B103F50. [Accessed 27 June 2017]
Dale, S.B. and Krueger, A.B. (2014). Estimating the effects of college characteristics over the career using administrative earnings data. Journal of human resources. 49 (2): 323-58.
Gov.uk. (2010). Changes to Tuition Fees and Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-tuition-fees-and-higher-education. [Accessed 27 June 2017]
HESA. (2017). NewDLHE: Destinations and Outcomes Review. Retrieved from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/innovation/records/reviews/newdlhe/model/survey. [Accessed 28 June 2017]
HEFCE & UUK. (2010). Service to society: Demonstrating the public benefits of higher education. London: HEFCE. p.8.14
Jenkins, H. (1995). Education and Production in the United Kingdom, Economics Discussion Paper No 101. Nuffield College, Oxford University
Kandiko, C. B. & Mawer, M. (2013). Student Expectations and Perceptions of Higher Education. London: King’s Learning Institute
Kelly, U. (2011). A new approach to valuing University public, cultural and community engagement. Impact of Higher Education Institutions on Regional Economies Research Brief No. 6.
Kelly, U., McLellan, D., & McNicoll, I. (2009). The impact of universities on the UK economy. Fourth Report. London: Universities UK.
McManus, R., Haddock-Fraser, J., Rands, P. (2017). A methodology to understand student choice of higher education institutions: the case of the United Kingdom. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management Vol. 39 , Iss. 4, 2017
Moretti, E. (2004). Estimating the Social Return to Higher Education: Evidence from Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Data. Journal of Econometrics, July/August, 175-212.
Pigden, L. and Jegede, F. (2016). Combined degrees & employability: a comparative analysis of single and joint honours graduates of UK universities, West East Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (2).
Pigden, L. & Moore, G. (2017). Highly skilled destinations outcomes for graduates of joint honours degrees compared with single honours degrees: analysis of UK data from the Destination of Leavers from Higher Education survey. Manuscript in preparation.
Reddin, M. (2017). The Reddin Survey of University Tuition Fees. Retrieved from https://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/university-tuition-fees/reddin-survey-of-university-tuition-fees/. [Accessed 1 May 2017]
Tomlinson, M. (2017) Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate employability. Education + Training. Vol. 59 Issue: 4, pp.338-352, https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2016-0090
UCAS. (2016). Applicants and Acceptances by Groups of Students. Retrieved from https://www.ucas.com/corporate/data-and-analysis/ucas-undergraduate-releases/ucas-undergraduate-end-cycle-data-resources/applicants-and-acceptances-groups-applicants-2016 [Accessed 27 June 2017]
UCAS. (2017). Undergraduate tuition fees and student loans. Retrieved from https://www.ucas.com/ucas/undergraduate/finance-and-support/undergraduate-tuition-fees-and-student-loans. [Accessed 1 May 2017]
Walker, I. and Zhu, Y. (2011). Differences by degree: evidence of the net financial rates of return to undergraduate study for England and Wales. Economics of education review. 30 (6): 1177-86.
Webber, D.A. (2014). The lifetime earnings premia of different majors: correcting for selection based on cognitive, noncognitive, and unobserved factors. Labour economics. 28: 14-23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of Published Articles
Author(s) retain the article copyright and publishing rights without any restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.