ANALYSIS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS BASED ON CLASS LEVEL

Authors

  • Hendra Kartika Department of Mathematics Education, Singaperbangsa Karawang University, Karawang, Indonesia
  • Dani Firmansyah Department of Mathematics Education, Singaperbangsa Karawang University, Karawang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2019.31.164172

Keywords:

Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognition, Knowledge about Cognition, Regulation about Cognition, Class Level

Abstract

Metacognitive awareness is essential not only for school level learners, but also for higher level students. They are still experiencing the process of learning and the assumptions about what they learn still exist in their minds. Therefore it can lead to metacognitive awareness with different levels. However, metacognitive awareness based on class level is still yet to be explored. In this study, the level of undergraduate students’ metacognitive awareness according to class level was identified. The participants were 31 college mathematics education students per group from first, second, and third-years at a state university in Indonesia. The data were collected through the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory. The data were analyzed as numbers, mean scores and percentages on every participants. The findings showed that class level had no effect on level of students’ metacognitive awareness. It also indicated that although there are no students who have very low metacognitive awareness, but the higher the class level, the lower their average of metacognitive awareness. These findings suggest that there should be attention from teachers as well as efforts to enhance students' metacognitive awareness.

References

Abeygunawardena, K.A.V., & Vithanapathirana, M.V. (2018). The Role of Teacher to Address Issues of Disruptive Behaviour of Student Learners in Mathematics Classrooms: A Study in the Sri Lankan Context. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 2(3), 152-173.

Aljaberi, N.M., & Gheith, E. (2015). University Students’ Level of Metacognitive Thinking and their Ability to Solve Problems. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(3), 121-134.

Chauhan, A., & Singh, S. (2014). Metacognition: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 3(3), 21-22.

Feiz, J.P. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and attitudes toward foreign language learning in the efl context of turkey. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences, 232, 459-470. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.063.

Gopinath, S. (2014). Metacognitive awareness in teaching and teaching competency: a survey on student teachers at secondary level. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(4), 33-35.

Gundogdu, C. & Celebi, E. (2017). An analysis of the metacognitive awareness levels of students in Firat University's department of sports sciences according to their program types and grades. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 9(2), 285-290.

Hoe, L.N., Cheong, A.C.S., & Yee, L.P. (2001). The Role of Metacognition in the Learning of Mathematics among Low-Achieving Students. Teaching and Learning, 22(2), 18-30.

Hsu, L., & Hsieh, S. (2014). Factors affecting metacognition of undergraduate nursing students in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20, 233-241. doi:10.1111/ijn.12131.

Lessani, A., Yunus, A., & Bakar, K. (2017). Comparison of New Mathematics Teaching Methods with Traditional Method. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1285-1297.

Mahdavi, M. (2014). An Overview: metacognition in education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 2(3), 529-535.

Ozcan, Z.C. (2014). Assessment of metacognition in mathematics: which one of two methods is a better predictor of mathematics achievement?. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2014, 6(1), 49-57.

Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing Metacognition: Theory and Practices. Int. J. Asst. Tools in Educ, 4(2), 134-148. doi: 10.21449/ijate.298299.

Sawhney, N., & Bansal, S. (2015). Metacognitive awareness of undergraduate students in relation to their academic achievement. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(1), 107-114.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Toit, S.D., & Kotze, G. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras, 70, 57-67.

Tok, H., Ozgan, H., & Dos, B. (2010). Assessing metacognitive awareness and learning strategies as positive predictors for success in a distance learning class. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7(14), 123-134.

Tosun, C., & Senocak, E. (2013). The effects of problem-based learning on metacognitive awareness and attitudes toward chemistry of prospective teachers with different academic backgrounds. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 61-73.

Young, A., & Fry, J.D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-29

How to Cite

Kartika, H., & Firmansyah, D. (2019). ANALYSIS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS BASED ON CLASS LEVEL. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 3(1), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2019.31.164172