EVALUATION OF THE COACHING TEAMS PROJECT TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.42.228250Keywords:
Project Evaluation, Education Quality Development, Coaching Teams ProjectAbstract
The purpose of this research was to the assessment of the “Coaching Teams” for increasing evaluation quality. The assessment model of the AMET project developed consists of 4 assessment points, which are appropriate assessment, monitoring assessment, efficiency assessment, and transfer of knowledge assessment. Find content validity by experts assess the consistency between each assessment and the objectives to be evaluated. The expert’s evaluation found that the consistency index is between 0.60-1.00. When evaluating the Coaching Teams project to improve the quality of education, the budget year 2019 of 11 schools, it is found that the appropriate assessment, monitoring assessment, efficiency assessment, and transfer of knowledge assessment were accordance with the objectives of the project. The average consistency of the evaluation results is 4.60–4.80 and the standard deviation is 0.45–0.55.
References
Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Education. (2020). Project assessment model. Accessed August 25, 2020. Available From http://econ.tu.ac.th/class/archan/Sakon/.pdf
Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University. (2017). The report on the Education Quality and Local Community Development with the Mentoring from Higher Education Institutions in the Lower Central Region University Network. Kanchanaburi: Kanchanaburi Provincial Education Office.
Landua, P. (2018). How to improve your project evaluation, page 18. Austin: Project Manage.
Mahidol University (2017). His Majesty the King’s Working Principles. Bangkok: Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.p
Ministry of Education (1998). Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 1997. Bangkok: National assembly liberary of Thailand.
Ministry of Education. (2018). The report on the Education in Thailand. Bangkok : n.p.
Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public Organization) (2018). Annual Report Year 2017. Bangkok: Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public Organization)
Office of Education Council. (2017). Education Plan B.E. 2017-2036. Bangkok. PrigwhanGraphic Co., Ltd.
Office of the National Education Commission. (2000 ). Education Change. Bangkok: National assembly liberary of Thailand.
Parsons, J., Gokey, C. & Thornton, M. (2013). Indicators of inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts in security justice programming, page 9. British: Department for international development.
Team, M. (2011). Project evaluation planning: The general guidelines, page 11. My Mg Home: Project evaluation institute.
United Nations. (2017). Evaluation Handbook Guidance for designing, conducting and using independent evaluations at UNODC, page 11. Vienna: Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of Published Articles
Author(s) retain the article copyright and publishing rights without any restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
