GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT THE SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY IN THAILAND

Authors

  • Piyawan Sunasuan Mahidol University International Demonstration School, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  • Thiranan Pansuppawat Department of Curriculum and Instruction Graduate School, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  • Mananya Manaratchasak Phra Tamnak Suankulab Mahamongkol School, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  • Maream Nillapun Department of Curriculum and Instruction Graduate School, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.42.171192

Keywords:

Curriculum Development, Intensive English Program, English for Academic Purposes, English for Communication, English for Occupational Purposes

Abstract

This research aims to develop a guide to the development of the intensive English program for Graduate students in the study context of reviewing the English intensive courses for graduate students in three institutions: Kent State University, Chulalongkorn University, and Mahidol University, and compare them to the English intensive course in Silpakorn University. The objectives were 1) To study the potential of the current intensive English program with the expected proficiency level 2) To study the English language skills required for the development of the Intensive English Program for Graduate Students at the Silpakorn University in Thailand. The research design followed mixed methods to answer the research questions. The data was collected from both primary data by survey questionnaire with 46 students enrolled in the ENG 102 and ENG 103 courses of the academic year of 2019/2020 in the first semester from the Silpakorn University, Sanamchandra Palace Campus, and secondary data using descriptive research by focus groups discussion with 6 students from the previous group, and interviews with two teachers. The data was collected from 1) student survey 2) teacher interview and 3) focus group discussion, and analyzed by calculating the mean (x̅), the standard deviation, priority needs index (PNI), frequency, and document analysis. According to the research results, the current course only meets the overall expectation at a medium level. The course is found to only focus on passing the standard criteria but does not meet several needs of learners in relevant to academic purposes, communication, and occupational purposes. More program options for specific skills are highly recommended including academic writing skills, reading skills at a practical level, writing skills for occupational purposes, reading skills for occupational purposes, speaking skills for academic purposes, and listening skills for occupational purposes.

References

Albostan, Y. (2012). An Investigation of The Occupational English Language Needs of Diplomats Whose Second Language Is English. Masters level, Bilkent University.

Asawaphokin, V. (2011). Development of an English Communication Curriculum for Non-Academic Personnel of Srinakharinwirot University. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Volume 3 (6), pp. 118-128.

Ball, S. (1985). English for the English since 1906, in I. Goodson (Ed.) Social Histories of the Secondary Curriculum: subjects for study. London: Falmer Press.

Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., & Furst, E. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. London: Longmans Green & Co. Ltd.

Chulalongkorn University. (2014). Announcement of Chulalongkorn University: English language proficiency criteria for students in Ph.D. And Master's degree programs. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Council of Europe (n.d.). The CEFR Levels. Retrieved from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions

Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Dave, R. H. (1967). Psychomotor domain. International Conference of Educational Testing. Retrieved from: http://detonline.org/id/module5/Psychomotor%20Objectives.pdf

Deller, J. (2019). Bloom's Taxonomy Levels of Learning: The Complete Post. Retrieved from: https://kodosurvey.com/blog/blooms-taxonomy-levels-learning-complete-post

Dixon, J. (1975). Growth through English (set in the perspective of the seventies). Oxford: Oxford University Press/NATE.

EF (2018). EF English Proficiency Index. Retrieved from: https://www.ef.co.th/epi/regions/asia/thailand/

Febriana, D., Intan, D. R., Oktaviani, D. R., & Supriadi, Y. (2019). English for Occupational Purposes Paper: English for Specific Purposes Course Design. Siliwangi University. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332446791_ESP_Course_Design_English_for_Occupational_Purposes_Paper

Gestanti, R. A., Nimasari, E. P., & Mufanti, R. (2019). Esp Issue in Indonesian Tertiary Context: What Students Need in Learning English. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, Volume 3 (1), pp. 98-117. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2019.31.98117

Gibbons, P. (2009). English Learners, Academic Literacy, and Thinking. USA: Heinemann.

Kent State University (2019). Homepage. Retrieved from: Kent State University: https://www.kent.edu/

Knowles, M. (1986). Using learning contracts. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Laadem, M. (2017). E-Learning Integration in Higher Education: Focus on Moroccan Departments of English. Pupil: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, Volume 1 (2), pp. 115-133. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2017.12.115133

Mahidol University. (2019a). Announcement, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University: The English competency standards of students in doctoral’s degree program. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University.

Mahidol University. (2019b). Announcement, Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University: The English competency standards of students in master’s degree program, graduate diploma program, advanced Graduate Diploma Program. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University.

McGraw, K. (2010). Innovation and change in the 1999 NSW HSC English syllabus: Challenges and problems. PhD level, University of Sydney.

Nunan, D. (2001). Design Tasks for Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prachachat Business (2018). EF explores the use of English as a second language around the world, revealing the Thai ranking behind in Asia. Retrieved from: https://www.prachachat.net/education/news-250827

Roger, E. M., & Rogers, R. A. (1976). Communication in organizationsv. New York: Free Press.

Sakcharoen, Piya. (2015). Adult Learning Theory and Self-Directed Learning Concept: Learning Process for Promoting Lifelong Learning. Journal of the Thai Royal Army Nurses, Volume 16 (1), pp. 8-13.

Silpakorn University. (2019). Silpakorn University announcement on Standardization and testing of English proficiency to graduate of graduate students. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

The Minister of Education of Thailand. (2016). Announcement of the Higher Education Commission on the policy of raising the standard of English in higher education institutions. Bangkok: Office of the Higher Education Commission.

The Nation Thailand (2018). New approach to teaching English already shows results. Retrieved from: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30355408#

The Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2016). Announcement: National Economic and Social Development Plan 2017 - 2020. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

University of Washington School of Public Health. (2014). Effective Adult Learning A Toolkit for Teaching Adults. Seattle: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Viriya, C. (2018). Using Task-Based Learning with Students of Academic English. Arab World English Journal, Volume 9 (4), pp. 337-346. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.25

Wanthong, N. (2018). Development of English Teaching Curriculum through Problem-Based Learning Approach of Teachers in SANUK Province Cluster. College of Asian Scholars Journal, Volume 8 (Special Edition), pp. 193-201.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-23

How to Cite

Sunasuan, P., Pansuppawat, T., Manaratchasak, M., & Nillapun, M. (2020). GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT THE SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY IN THAILAND. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.42.171192