A STUDY ON DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP PRACTICES AND ITS IMPACT ON TEACHING AND LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2021.51.5572Keywords:
Distributed Leadership, Teaching and Learning, Type 1C Schools, Type Two Schools, Sri LankaAbstract
School leadership has become very popular in the current educational discourse. Distributed leadership has been identified as one of the most important leadership practices in terms of enhancing the quality of teaching and learning since it involves many members of the school. Also, it has been found that the main purpose of distributed leadership is to create secondary level leaders within the school and thus give more opportunities for teachers to improve their leadership skills. This study focused on investigating the distributed leadership practices and their impact on teaching and learning in type 1C and type 2 schools in Sri Lanka. The objectives of this study were to identify how principals and teachers understand the concept of distributed leadership; how distributed leadership practices enhance teaching and learning; and what challenges principals and teachers face when devolving and practicing leadership responsibilities in their schools. Altogether 8 schools, 8 principals, 10 sectional heads, and 200 teachers were selected for the study. Both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to gather the data necessary. The findings revealed that all the principals and a significant number of teachers in the type 1C and type two schools fully understood the concept of distributed leadership and have linked it with teaching and learning. The study further revealed that the distributed leadership practices contributed to enhancing the quality of teaching and learning in both types’ schools to some level. However, it was revealed from this study that a significant number of teachers and principals in both types’ schools face a number of challenges when practicing distributed leadership roles in their schools due to the major challenge of not having a collaborative working environment.
References
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
Duignan, P. & Bhindi, N. (1997) ‘Authentic leadership: An Emerging Perspective’, Journal of Educational Administration, 35(3): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239710170119
Duignan, P. (2007) Educational Leadership: Key Challenges and Educational Issues. Melbourne: Cambridge University of Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168564
Duignan, P. & Bhindi, N. (1997) ‘Authentic leadership: An Emerging Perspective’, Journal of Educational Administration, 35(3): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239710170119
Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp.877-917). Cambridge, ma: Addison-Wesley.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed Properties: A New Architecture for Leadership, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 28, 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006
Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863235
Hargreaves, A. & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining Leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9):693 –700. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308400910
Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9048-4
Harris, A. & Muijs, D. (2002) Improving Schools through Teacher Leadership. London: Oxford University Press.
Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2008). Improving schools through teacher leadership. London: Open University Press.
Hopkins D, West, M. & Ainscow, M. (1996) Improving the Quality of Education for All. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (1996). Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, Second Edition. London Sage Publication, London: Sage Publications.
Leithwood K, Harris A, Hopkins D (2008) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1): 27-42.
National College of School Leadership (NCSL) (2003) Distributed Leadership. www.ncsl.org.uk/distributedleadership
National College of School Leadership (NCSL) (2003) The Role and Purpose of Middle Leaders in Schools. www.ncsl.org.uk/literaturereviews
Newby, P. (2010) Research Methods for Education, London: Pearson.
Rutherford, D. (2002). Changing Times and Changing Roles. Educational Management and Administration, 30 (4), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X020304006
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1999). Refocusing Leadership to Build Community. The High School Magazine, September 1999, 12-15.
Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R., and Diamond, J.B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: Implications of a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1): 3-34.
Spillane, J. and Diamond, J. (2007) (Eds) Distributed Leadership in Practice Colombia University: Teachers’ College Press, New York.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Published Articles
Author(s) retain the article copyright and publishing rights without any restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
