• Karuna Samuel Finch International American School, Warsaw, Poland



Social Constructivism, Virtual Learning, Questionnaire, Secondary Education, Instrument


Virtual learning has never been an option for secondary education, but the pandemic situations have blurred this line. A considerable population of school students has been attending school from home for roughly five months now. Social Constructivist pedagogy is the need of the hour and, multiple research focussed on effective teaching and learning have endorsed it. Presently, there are no validated Instruments that, can measure and monitor the Social Constructivist domain, in a synchronous virtual classroom. This study discusses an Instrument developed to measure the social constructivist dimension of a virtual classroom in light of the concepts of Social Constructivism and Cybergogy. This paper includes an assessment of the pilot study. The evidence for the validity (Cronbach's alpha) and construct reliability of this Instrument assure that the presented assessment tool is well suited to measure the Social Constructivist dimension of a secondary level virtual classroom.


Albiser, E., Echazarra, A., Fraser, P., Fülöp, G., Schwabe, M., & Tremblay, K. (2020). School education during COVID-19: Were teachers and students ready? - OECD [Country Notes]. Retrieved from

Applefield, James. M., Huber, R., & Moallem, M. (2000). Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding. The High School Journal, 84(2), 35–53.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed). Wadsworth.

Aspin, D. N. (Ed.). (2007). Philosophical perspectives on lifelong learning. Springer.

Bjørndal, C. T., & Gjesdal, S. (2020). The role of sport school programmes in athlete development in Norwegian handball and football. European Journal for Sport and Society, 1–23.

Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1998). Assessment in a social constructivist classroom. Social Education, 62(1), 32–34.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

Bruner, J. S. (1977). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (Ose). Online Learning, 19(4).

Erling, B. (2020, April 7). As lockdown pushes education online, Poland’s digitally excluded children are being left behind. Notes from Poland.

Field, A. P., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage Publications.

Finch, K., Kala, S., & Sathya, V. (2021). The review of mobile applications and wireless technologies in sustaining k-12 schools during covid-19. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Mobile Communications and Applications: Online First, 0(0).

Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378.

Gehlbach, H., & Brinkworth, M. E. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 380–387.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. A & B.

Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102183.

Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Kester, L., & Kalz, M. (2017). Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 6–27.

Knowles, M. S. (1978). Andragogy: Adult learning theory in perspective. Community College Review, 5(3), 9–20.

Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the online cooperative learning attitude scale (Oclas). Computers & Education, 59(4), 1162–1169.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

Laadem, M. (2017). E-learning integration in higher education: Focus on moroccan departments of english. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 1(2), 115–133.

Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2013). A structural equation model of predictors of online learning retention. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 36–42.

Long, H. (n.d.). Virtual schooling has largely forced moms, not dads, to quit work. It will hurt the economy for years. Washington Post. Retrieved 7 November 2020, from

Madalińska-Michalak, J. (2017). School principal leadership and learning through practitioner research: Towards innovations in education. Labor et Educatio, 5.

Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialectical constructivism. Developmental Review, 2(4), 371–384.

Osborn, V., & Turner, P. (2002). Identifying at-risk students in lis distributed learning courses. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(3), 205.

Partlow, K. M., & Gibbs, W. J. (2003). Indicators of constructivist principles in internet-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 68–97.

Patton, L. (2020, August 6). Nyc is the last holdout on in-person schooling as big districts defy trump. BloombergQuint.

Powell, K., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and Social Constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom.

Prashanti, E., & Ramnarayan, K. (2020). Ten maxims for creating a safe learning environment. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(4), 550–553.

Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. Routledge.

Rahmawati, Y., Taylor, E., Taylor, P. C., & Koul, R. (2020). Student empowerment in a constructivist values learning environment for a healthy and sustainable world. Learning Environments Research.

Rannikmäe, M., Holbrook, J., & Soobard, R. (2020). Social constructivism—Jerome Bruner. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 259–275). Springer International Publishing.

Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Improvised lessons: Collaborative discussion in the constructivist classroom. Teaching Education, 15(2), 189–201.

Scopes, L. J. M. (2009). Learning archetypes as tools of Cybergogy for a 3D educational landscape: A structure for eTeaching in Second Life [Masters, University of Southampton].

Sebastianelli, R., Swift, C., & Tamimi, N. (2015). Factors affecting perceived learning, satisfaction, and quality in the online mba: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Education for Business, 90(6), 296–305.

Sunil, S. (2020, July 24). Millions of student’s risks falling through gaps as schools go online. NDTV.Com; Bloomberg.

Taber, K. (2013). Classroom-based research and evidence-based practice: An introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.

Thompson, E. (1999). Can the distance education student progress (Desp) inventory be used as a tool to predict attrition in distance education? Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 77–84.

Vygotskiĭ, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies (pp. 225–253). Springer-Verlag.

Wei, C.-W., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 529–545.

Wladis, C., & Samuels, J. (2016). Do online readiness surveys do what they claim? Validity, reliability, and subsequent student enrollment decisions. Computers & Education, 98, 39–56.




How to Cite

Finch, K. S. (2021). DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM IN A VIRTUAL CLASSROOM . PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 5(1), 23–39.