CHINA’S COVID – 19 RESPONSE STRATEGIES IN KUNMING YUNNAN PROVINCE
Received: 17th October 2025, Revised: 16th December 2026, 17th March 2026, Accepted: 23rd March 2026, Date of Publication: 1st April 2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2026.121.68100Keywords:
COVID – 19, Securitization, State Transformation, China’s Governance ModelAbstract
China, the country where the first cases of COVID-19 were detected and which was profoundly impacted by the global pandemic, has been a focal point for scrutiny and research regarding governmental performance and infection management. In the early stages of the epidemic, China swiftly implemented stringent lockdown and control measures, which proved effective in rapidly controlling the number of infections and maintaining them at a very low level for an extended period. However, following the official announcement on December 7, 2022, marking the end of the "Dynamic-Zero-COVID policy," China experienced a significant surge in infections. This outcome appears to have deviated from the Chinese government's initial plans, primarily due to the difficulty in balancing strict containment measures with economic stability. Consequently, the intensity of these policies was gradually relaxed until their complete cessation. The case of China demonstrates that the government's capacity to manage national crises is constrained by fragmented state power and increased autonomy among local administrative units. It is therefore inappropriate to view China through the lens of traditional West- philia assumptions. Instead, we must adopt a more open and contemporary perspective when analyzing the impact of COVID-19 in China. It is necessary to recognize that the Chinese government operates as a complex system characterized by decentralization, fragmentation and internationalization. Therefore, this paper aims to explore two questions through qualitative research: 1. How should we make sense of the Chinese government's prompt shift from a Dynamic Zero-COVID policy to an Opening-Up policy? 2. How did the local authority contribute to the decision-making of central government on the removal of Dynamic COVID–19 policy? I argue that the theory of securitization can serve as a valuable framework for understanding and explaining China's comprehensive policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, given the dispersion of power and interests among various units, deviations in objectives and conflicts are inevitable. Consequently, the process of securitization does not conform to a simplistic or idealized model. Instead, “contestation” occurs throughout the process, and the roles of “actors” and “audiences” are fluid rather than fixed, undergoing constant transformation. Furthermore, the research perspective applied in this article has value for the study of issues in other authoritarian countries.
References
Balzacq, T. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201.
BBC Monitoring. (2020). China coronavirus: Misinformation spreads online. BBC News.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Cai, C., Jiang, W., & Tang, N. (2021). Campaign-style crisis regime: how China responded to the shock of COVID-19. Policy Studies, 43(3), 599–619.
Chen, X. (2021). Digital Authoritarianism and the Health Code System in China. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2200-2218.
Chodor, T., & Hameiri, S. (2022). COVID-19 and the Pathologies of Australia’s Regulatory State. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(1), 28–52.
Côté, A. (2016). Agents without Agency: Assessing the Role of the Audience in Securitization Theory. Security Dialogue, 47(6), 541–558.
Dela Cruz, A. G., et al. (2022). Explaining Thailand’s politicized COVID-19 containment strategies. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(3), 378–398.
Duckett, J. (2020). The Resilience of the Chinese State in the Face of COVID-19. The China Quarterly, 244, 1005-1025.
Ergenc, C. (2022). Local variation and central-local relations in China’s pandemic management. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 17(3), 1–25.
Fu, D. (2022). Social Unrest and Policy Change in Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of China’s White Paper Protests. Perspectives on Politics, 20(4), 780-795.
Guo, S. (2021). The Role of Local Officials in China’s Pandemic Control. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 450-462.
Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2016b). Rising Powers and State Transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations, 22(1), 72–98.
Hameiri, S., Jones, L., & Heathershaw, J. (2019). Reframing the Rising Powers Debate: State Transformation and the Politics of Development. Third World Quarterly, 40(8), 1397–1414.
He, B. (2021). Civil Society and State Response to COVID-19 in China. Voluntas, 32, 889-901.
Huang, Y. (2022). Economic Costs of Zero-COVID in China. China Economic Review, 72, 101-115.
Jing, L. (2020). Community Governance in the Time of Epidemic. Chinese Sociological Review, 52(4), 345-368.
Jones, L., & Hameiri, S. (2021). COVID-19 and the Failure of the Neoliberal Regulatory State. Review of International Political Economy, 29(4), 1027–1052.
Jones, L., & Zou, Y. (2017). The Politics of Foreign Policy in a Fragmented State: The Case of China’s Mekong River Diplomacy. The China Quarterly, 232, 745–765.
Kirk, J. (2022). ‘The Cure Cannot be Worse than the Problem’: Securitising the Securitisation of COVID-19 in the USA. Contemporary Politics, 29(2), 141–160.
Kong, T. (2021). The Evolution of China’s Health Emergency Response System. Health Policy and Planning, 36(5), 670-682.
Li, M. J. (2019a). Hainan Province in China’s South China Sea Policy: A Case of Provincial Paradiplomacy. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 623–642.
Lieberthal, K. (2022). The End of Zero-COVID: What Happened? Foreign Affairs.
Lin, T. (2022). Border Control and Pandemic Management in Yunnan. Borderlands Journal, 15(2), 22-40.
Liu, K. (2022). China’s dynamic covid-zero policy and the Chinese economy: A preliminary assessment. International Review of Applied Economics, 36(5–6), 815–834.
Ma, X. (2022). Public Opinion and Policy Shifts in China. Asian Survey, 62(3), 450-470.
Mark, J., & Schuman, M. (2022). China’s Faltering “Zero COVID” Policy. Atlantic Council GeoTech Center.
McGregor, R. (2020). Asia’s Reckoning: China, Japan, and the Fate of U.S. Power in the Pacific Century. Penguin Books.
National Health Commission of the PRC. (2022). Notice on Further Optimizing and Implementing Measures for the Prevention and Control of COVID-19. Beijing: NHC.
Ngok, K. (2021). Social Policy and Crisis Response in China. Social Policy & Administration, 55(4), 560-575.
Oi, J. C. (1999). Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform. University of California Press.
Saich, T. (2021). Governance and Politics of China. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shirk, S. L. (2007). China: Fragile Superpower. Oxford University Press.
State Council Information Office. (2022). What to insist on "dynamic clearing"? China Government Website.
Stritzel, H., & Chang, S. C. (2015). Securitization and counter-securitization in Afghanistan. Security Dialogue, 46(6), 548–567.
Teets, C. (2022). The Politics of Crisis Management in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(135), 400-415.
Thornton, P. M. (2022). The Discourse of Pandemic in China. Modern China, 48(2), 150-180.
Walder, A. G. (2021). The Chinese State in the Era of Economic Reform. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 200-220.
Wang, Y. (2022). Local Governance under Pressure: The Case of Shanghai Lockdown. The China Journal, 88, 112-130.
Wu, F., et al. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on China’s Regional Economies and Industries. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(4), 565–583.
Yang, D. (2022). Federalism with Chinese Characteristics and the Pandemic. Comparative Political Studies, 55(6), 900-925.
Zha, H., et al. (2022). Chinese Provincial Government Responses to COVID-19: Variation and Determinants. Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper.
Zhang, H., & Li, M. (2020). China’s water diplomacy in the Mekong: The role of Yunnan Province. Water International, 45(4), 347–364.
Zhao, D. (2022). The Logic of Legitimacy in China’s Pandemic Response. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 27, 45-62.
Zhou, X. (2020). The Governance of COVID-19 in China. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 6(3), 300-325.
Zhu, X. (2021). Policy Experimentation in China’s Pandemic Response. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 250-270
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
