LOAFING: A CASE OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ISSUE

Received: 03rd May 2022; Revised: 02nd June 2022, 27th June 2022; Accepted: 29th June 2022

Authors

  • Leo Roswald M. Tugonon Faculty, College of Arts and Sciences (CAS); College of Graduate Studies (CGS), Palompon Institute of Technology, Palompon, Leyte, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2022.82.6982

Keywords:

Absenteeism, Employees, Loafing, Management, Single Case Study

Abstract

Employees are expected to be at work on time and perform their tasks to be productive. Otherwise, it is a performance issue, unauthorized absenteeism, or loafing. It is not only prevalent in private entities but also in government agencies. The Civil Service Commission (CSC) in the Philippine context is a government agency that discouraged loafing during work hours and limits the use of official time for non-related government tasks. The study utilized an observational research technique using a single case method where the participant was closely observed in the most natural settings in the workplace. The study investigates the performance of the employee and shows solutions to how the management addressed the issue. This case study presents an instance wherein an employee was reported by his co-employee (an informant) who committed loafing or frequent unauthorized absences from duty during office hours. Three alternative solutions are offered. First, refer the case to the Human Resource Management Officer who is a trained adjudicator, mediator, and conciliator. Second, determine the root cause of the problem and suggest an alternative course of action; and third, instead of imposing a harsh penalty of suspension or dismissal as the case may be, it would be appropriate for the management to subject the problem employee to an intervention program. There is a need to act with compassion and justice to ensure no repetitive action that may happen in the future.

References

Al-Jubouri AAN, Alabassi ZM, Mohammed SJ. Role of Organizational Accountability in the Reduction of Social Loafing Behavior in the Workplace: An Empirical Study in Al-Sadr General Hospital. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil 2020; 24(07):13.

American Management Association (AMA) (2008). 2007 Electronic Monitoring & Surveillance Survey., Retrieved Feb 28, 2008, from http://press.amanet.org/press-releases/177/2007-electronicmonitoring-surveillance-survey/

Bevan, S. & Hayday, S. (1997). The Institute for Employment Studies. https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/353.pdf

Bezek, P.J., & Britton, S.M. (2001). Employer Monitoring of Employee Internet Use And EMail: MEALEY'S Cyber Tech Litigation Report, 2, Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://www.foleybezek.com/art.InternetFile.pdf

Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010315371

Cohen, A.B., Malka, A., Rozin, P. & Cherfas, L. (2004). Religion and unforgivable offenses. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/e633942013-781

Cucchiella, Federica; Massimo Gastaldi, &Luigi, Ranieri. (2014). Managing Absenteeism in the Workplace: The Case of an Italian Multiutility Company. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 150: 1157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.131

Elias, O., Capri, G. F., Masicampo, E. J., Lara, K. K., Robert, E. A. and Steven, R. F., (2017), " Accountability: a missing construct in models of adherence behavior and in clinical practice", journal Patient Preference and Adherence, 25 July, pp. 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S135895

Espeland & Sauder, (2007); Rieh, (2002); & Wilson, (1983). Well-respected raters have accumulated trust over decades, so people may act on this “expert” information, even when it is erroneous.

Fathizadeh, A., Zare, R., Zabeti, M. (2021). Designing Systematic Model of Organizational Loafing: Prerequisites and Consequences. Organizational Culture Management, (), -. doi: 10.22059/jomc.2021.327517.1008325

Hardy, C., & Latané, B. (1986). Social loafing on a cheering task. Social Science, 71(2-3), 165–172.

Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K. (1989). Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(6), 934-941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.934

Hoffman, R (2020, June 22). Social loafing: definition, examples, and theory. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/social-loafing.html

Kelley, J.; & Simmons, B. (2019). Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicator https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108763493

International Organization, Volume 73, Issue 3, Summer 2019, pp. 491 - 510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000146

Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78

Kumar, M. (2016). Human Relations Theory of Elton Mayo. polticsmania.wordpress.com

Nickson, Dennis; Tom Baum; Erwin Losekoot; & Alison Morrison. (2002). Skills, Organizational Performance and Economic Activity in the Hospitality Industry: A Literature Review. Oxford: University of Oxford and Warwick, Economic and Social Research Council Center for Skills, Knowledge, and Organizational Performance (SKOPE).

Nilsen, T., Haugen, T., Reinboth, M., Peters, D.M. & Hoigaard, R. (2014), "Explicit prior knowledge of social loafing does not reduce so cial loafing in subsequent team cycle trial performance, Kinesiologia Slovenica, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 17–25

Noel H., & Danielle M. (2017), " Trust and accountability in UK charities: Exploring the virtuous circle", The British Accounting Review, Vol. 50 No 2, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.004

Norfaiezah, S. & Ian T. (2014), " Broadening corporate accountability: An ‘idealized’ downward accountability model", Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 164, pp. 429 – 436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.099

Peters, Thomas A. (1999). Computerized Monitoring and Online Privacy. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company.

Philippine Constitution (1987). Section 1 of Article 3 of the Bill of Rights.

Praveen, A. & Connie, L. O. (2008), "Social Loafing on Group Projects Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction", Journal of Marketing Education, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 255-264.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283

RA 6713. An Act Establishing a Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, to Uphold the Time-honored Principle of Public Office Being a Public Trust, Granting Incentives and Rewards for Exemplary Service, Enumerating Prohibited Acts and Transactions and Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof and for Other Purposes.

Schneider, Benjamin; Ellen G. Godfrey; Seth C. Hayes; Mina Huang; Beng-Chong Lim; Lisa Hisae Nishii; Jana L. Raver; & Jonathan C. Ziegert. (2003). The Human Side of Strategy: Employee Experiences of Strategic Alignment in a Service Organization. Organizational Dynamics 32: 122–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(03)00014-7

Stark, E. M., Shaw, J. D., & Duffy, M. K. (2007). Preference for group work, winning orientation, and social loafing behavior in groups. Group & Organization Management, 32(6), 699-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106291130

Sreenu, G.; & Saleem Durai, M.A. (2019). Intelligent video surveillance: a review through deep learning techniques for crowd analysis. J Big Data 6, 48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0212-5

Stephen, K. M. & Stephen, J. W. (2018), "Accountability and responsibility defined", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp.687-707. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0058

Tariq, Al-Shbail and Aini A. (2018), "E-government and accountability: How to mitigate the disorders and dysfunctions of accountability relationships", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp.155-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2017-0057

Downloads

Published

2022-07-15

How to Cite

Tugonon, L. R. M. (2022). LOAFING: A CASE OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ISSUE: Received: 03rd May 2022; Revised: 02nd June 2022, 27th June 2022; Accepted: 29th June 2022. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2022.82.6982