AN INVESTIGATION OF THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENGLISH LITERATURE AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING MASTER’S THESES IN TERMS OF SWALES’ CARS MODEL

Authors

  • Eren Uymaz School of Foreign Languages, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.552562

Keywords:

Academic Discourse, Organizing a Research Article, CARS

Abstract

This study aims at identifying the differences and similarities between English literature master’s theses and English language teaching master’s theses in terms of John Swales’ Creating a Research Space (CARS) model. John Swales originated this model for the introduction parts of the research articles and offered researchers a guideline to follow while writing the introduction parts of research articles. This research tries to fill a gap by adapting this model to examine the introduction parts of the English literature and English language teaching master’s theses. For this end, the researcher chose 5 English language and literature (ELIT) MA (Master of Arts) theses and 5 English language teaching (ELT) MA (Master of Arts) theses all written in 2014 by Turkish students. The results indicated that there are differences between these two theses types in terms of Establishing a Territory (Move 1), Establishing a Niche (Move 2) and Occupying a Niche (Move 3) moves. Based on the findings, it is recommended that English literature master’s theses and English language teaching master’s theses be evaluated in a different perspective although literature and language teaching are related with each other. 

References

Adika, G.S.K. (2014). Swales’ Cars Model and the Metaphor of Research Space: An illustration with an African Journal. Legon Journal of the Humanities 25, 58-75. https://doi.org/10.4314/ljh.v25i1.4

Dudley-Evans, T. (2000). Genre Analysis: A key to a theory of ESP? Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE), 2, 3-11.

Hult, Christine A. 1987. « Assessment Topics: The Importance of the Rhetorical Frame.» WPA: Writing Program Administration, Vol.10, Number 3, Spring, 1987. p.19-28. Council of Writing Program Administrators. Retrieved from wpacouncil.org/archives/10n3/10n3hult.pdf

Shehzad, W. (2008). Move Two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica, 15, 25-50.

Swales, J.M., & H. Najar (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 4, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088387004002004

Swales, J.M., & Christine B. Feak. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Essential Tasks and Skills. 3rd edition. USA: University of Michigan Press.

Swales, J.M., & Christine B. Feak. 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Essential Tasks and Skills. USA: University of Michigan Press.

Weissberg, Robert & Suzanne Baker. 1990. Writing Up Research, Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Zand-Vakili, E. (2012). The contrastive move analysis: An investigation of Persian and English research articles’ abstract and introduction parts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 129-137.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-15

How to Cite

Uymaz, E. (2017). AN INVESTIGATION OF THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENGLISH LITERATURE AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING MASTER’S THESES IN TERMS OF SWALES’ CARS MODEL. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 552–562. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.552562