DOES “GLASS CEILING” OR “SLIPPERY LADDER” LEAD TO THE SCARCITY OF WOMEN IN ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP? AN APPROACH OF Q-METHODOLOGY

Authors

  • Lily- Hue Trinh Hoang Hong Public Policy and Administration Department, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan (ROC)Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.41.343359

Keywords:

Women Leadership, Gender Inequality, Higher Education, Q-methodology

Abstract

Gender equality and gender parity has been the central issue for countries. Lack of senior women leaders, in general, frequently been the heated subject of debate in many countries and Vietnam is no exception. Despite of recently women have made great contributions both in the academia and social life, they still remain underrepresented in the top levels of leaders both in public administration and higher education institutions. This study aims to explore the main reasons leading to the scarcity of women in academic leadership, in the case of Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh city (VNU-HCM). Based on using the Q methodology-introduced by William Stephenson in 1935, this study asked eighteen women of VNU-HCM to rank-order a set of different forty statements about causes limited the advancement opportunities of women from “most disagree” to “most agree”. By identifying disagreement and consensus among participants, four diverse perspectives on the root causes for the persistence of gender inequality at the highest ranks of academic leadership were uncovered including factor 1 - family orientation, factor 2- alternative choices, factor 3- traditional cultural social values, and factor 4- workplace attitude and structure. This study also finds out that most of female managers at the VNU-HCM maybe face ‘slippery ladder” than a “glass ceiling” because they by themselves skip the advancement opportunities. 

References

Abelson, J.S., Chartrand, G., Moo, T.A., Moore, M., Yeo, H., (2016). The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015, The American Journal of Surgery. 212(4):566-572. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.012

Airini, S.C., Conner. L., McPherson. K., Midson. B., and Wilson. C., (2011). Learning to be leaders in higher education: what helps or hinders women’s advancement as leaders in universities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 39(1) 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210383896

August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45 (2), 177–192.

Bilen-Green. C, Froelich. K.A, Jacobson S. W., (2008). The prevalence of women in academic leadership positions, and potential impact on prevalence of women in the professorial ranks. Proceedings of the 2008 WEPAN Conference. Women in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network.

Bower, B. L., Wolverton M. (2009). Answering the Call, African American Women in Higher Education Leadership, (1st Ed.) Stylus Publishing, Virginia.

Brown, S.R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Chestermana, C., Smithb, A.R., Peters, M., (2005). Not doable jobs! Exploring senior women’s attitudes to academic leadership roles, Women’s Studies International Forum 28 (2005) 163– 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.005

Cheung. F.M, Halpern. D.F. (2010). Women at the top: powerful leaders define success as work + family in a culture of gender. Am Psychol. 65(3).182-193.

Danesh. A.N., Baumann. A., Cordindley. L. (2008). Q-methodology in nursing research: a promising method for the study of subjectivity. West J Nurs Res. 30(6):759-73.

Dean. D.R., Bracken S.J., Allen. J.K., (2009). Women in Academic Leadership: Professional Strategies, Personal Choices (Women in Academe Series) (1st Ed.) Stylus Publishing, Virginia.

Dominici, F., Fried, L.P., and Zeger, S. L., (2009). So Few Women Leaders, Retrieved July 2009 https://www.aaup.org/article/so-few-women-leaders#.WQVXUp-72uk

Eggins, H., (2015). The changing role of women in higher education academic and leadership issues. (1st Ed.). Springer.

Exel, J.V, de Graaf, G., (2005). Q methodology: A sneak preview. Online document available from http://www.qmethod.org.

Green, C. B., Froelich, K. A., Jacobson, S.W. (2008). The prevalence of women in academic leadership positions, and potential impact on prevalence of women in the professorial ranks, WEPAN 2008 National Conference: Gateway to Diversity: Getting Results through Strategic Communications, Penn State University.

Fitzgerald, T., (2014). Women Leaders in Higher Education: Shattering the Myths, (1st Ed.). Routledge, New York.

Hallman, L.D., (2016). Barriers and Bias: The status of women in leadership. Retrieved July 2009 March 29th 2016 https://www.aauw.org/research/barriers-and-bias/

Henkel, M. (2002). Emerging concepts of academic leadership and their implications for intra-institutional roles and relationships in higher education. European Journal of Education, 37(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-3435.00089

Herminia, I., Ely, R. and Kolb, D., (2013). Women Rising: The Unseen Barriers. R1309C. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 60–66.

Isaac, C., Kaatz, A., Lee, B., Carnes, M., (2012). An Educational Intervention Designed to Increase Women's Leadership Self-Efficacy, CBE Life Sci Educ, 11(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-02-0022

Johnson, C. W., Chena, F., Charlynn, R., Jennifer, W., (2010). Bridging the Gap: 16 Years of Academic Leadership Development for Women, NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education, 3(1), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-7890.1049

Kloot, L. (2004). Women and leadership in universities: A case study of women academic managers. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410554760

Miller, K. (2006). Introduction women in leadership and management: Progress thus far? In D. McTavish & K. Miller (Eds.), Women in leadership and management (1st Ed). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Nguyen T.L.H, (2013), Barriers to and facilitators of female Deans' career advancement in higher education: an exploratory study in Vietnam. Higher Education, 66 (1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9594-4

Rhode, D. L., (2003). The Difference “Difference” Makes: Women and Leadership. (1st Ed). Stanford Law and Politics.

Ruijs, A. (1993). Women Managers in Education: A Worldwide Progress Report. Coombe Lodge Report, 23 (7-8).

Samble J.N. (2008). Female faculty: Challenges and choices in the United States and beyond. New Directions for Higher Education. 143. 55-62.

Sampson, M., (2008). Is there a glass ceiling for women in development? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18 (3). 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.188

Seierstad. C., Kirton. G. (2015). Having It All? Women in High Commitment Careers and Work –Life Balance in Norway. Gender, Work and Organization. 22 (4), 390-404.

Tandon, S., Kohli, A., Manipal, S.B., (2007). Barriers to leadership positions for Indian women in academic dentistry, International Dental Journal, 57(5). 331-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2007.tb00142.x

Taylor, M.L.M, White, K., (2014). Women in academic leadership, Advances in Gender Research. 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-212620140000019017

Thomas, K.M., Bierema, L., and Landau, H. (2004). Advancing women’s leadership in academe: New directions for research and HRD practice. Equal Opportunities International, 23(7/8). 62- 77. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150410787909

Twombly. S.B., (1998), Women academic leaders in a Latin American university: Reconciling the paradoxes of professional lives. Higher Education, 35, 367–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003165822754

Vilkinas, T. Ladyshewsky. R.K., (2011). Leadership behavior and effectiveness of academic program in Australian universities, Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 40(1). 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211420613

Ward, K., Eddy, P.L., Women and Academic Leadership: Leaning Out, Retrieved December 09th 2013 http://www.chronicle.com/article/WomenAcademic-Leadership-/143503

Wenniger, M.D., (2001). Mary Helen Conroy, Gender Equity or Bust! On the Road to Campus Leadership with Women in Higher Education, (1st Ed). Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-23

How to Cite

Hong, L. H. (2018). DOES “GLASS CEILING” OR “SLIPPERY LADDER” LEAD TO THE SCARCITY OF WOMEN IN ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP? AN APPROACH OF Q-METHODOLOGY. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.41.343359