AN ANALYSIS OF GENDER AND STATUS AFFECTING CONVERSATIONAL INTERRUPTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.41.257271Keywords:
Conversational Interruptions, Gender and Interruptions, Social Status and Interruptions, Dominance in ConversationAbstract
Interruptions as conversational strategies can be used to achieve either dominance or cooperation in a talk. The purpose of this study was to analyze conversational interruptions between Thai genders with different social statuses. Five episodes of the talk show BeMyGuest sponsored by the Thai Government’s Department of Public Relations were selected to analyze which type of interruption, intrusive or cooperative, males with different social statuses made in interacting with the woman show host. A total of 217 utterances were analyzed for interruptions under Zimmerman and West’s (1975) guidelines. The results revealed that in the context of the woman having a higher or equal status as a man, the male interrupted the conversation more often than his conversation partner. However, in the case the host having a lower social status than the male guest, it was found that the woman interrupted more often than the man. The result in the last case does not support the dominance approach, which points out that men dominate women in conversation. Culture is considered an important factor accounting for the genders’ behavior of interruptions in the conversation.
References
Aeusrivongse, N. (2014). ผ้าขาวม้า, ผ้าซิ่น, กางเกงในและฯลฯ : ว่าด้วยประเพณี, ความเปลี่ยนแปลงและเรื่องสรรพสาระ[Loincloth, sarong, underpants, and so on: with tradition, change and the subject matter]. (2nd ed.). Thailand: Matichon.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 253-276). MIT Press.
Chanthawanit, S. (1991). Raingan phon kanwichai kanchat chuang chan thang sangkhom: Kiattiphum khong achip tang tang nai sangkhom Thai. Thailand: Khrongkan Nangsu Lem, Sathaban Wichai Sangkhom, Chulalongkonmahawitthayalai.
James, D., & Clarke, S. (1993). Women, men, and interruptions: a critical review. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/jamesClarke.pdf
Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C.T. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318309374104
Li, H. Z. (2001). Cooperative and Intrusive Interruptions in Inter- and Intracultural Dyadic Discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(3), 259-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X01020003001
Murata, K. (1994). Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(4), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90011-6
West, C., Zimmerman, D. H. (1983).Small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorre, & C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, Gender, and Society (pp. 103-117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Tamuang, M. (2012). Inequality of Language Usage among Male and Female Student Group Discussions : A Case Study of Language, Society, and Culture Classroom at Naresuan University. Journal of Humanities, Naresuan University., 9(1), 67-80.
Trudgill, P., (1974) Sociolinguistics: An introduction. Great Britain: Hazell Watson & Viney.
Ueno, J. (2003). Gender differences in Japanese conversation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Studies.
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation Language and sex: Difference and dominance. pp: 105- 129. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.