PEER-TO-PEER LENDING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IMPACTS ON MSMES FINANCING IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Abdurrahman Faris Alwi Center for Law, Technology, RegTech and LegalTech Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Araya Anggara Putra Center for Law, Technology, RegTech and LegalTech Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Haninda Saras Hutami Center for Law, Technology, RegTech and LegalTech Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Lia Evanty Andriany Center for Law, Technology, RegTech and LegalTech Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Yoda Rifky Hanindya Center for Law, Technology, RegTech and LegalTech Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.52.10131023

Keywords:

Business Law, Small Business, Financial Technology, Peer-to-Peer Lending (P2P Lending), Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), Indonesia

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) contribute approximately 60% to Indonesian Gross Domestic Product (GDP). However, they struggle to obtain access in financing through traditional means, such as bank loans, due to weak credit ratings. For this reason, Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending exist as a viable financing alternative. Correspondingly, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) has taken a rapid measure to accommodate the growth of P2P Lending through FSA Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning Information Technology-Based Lending Services. However, no research analyzed the impact of the P2P Lending regulatory framework on MSMEs financing. This paper examines and analyzes the norms within the Regulation with a combination of empirical and normative approaches. First, this paper found that the purpose of P2P Lending Regulatory Framework is to promote access to financing for MSMEs. Second, P2P Lending Regulatory Framework has a crucial role in activating the digital economy ecosystem for MSMEs. In conclusion, this paper suggests that the law has a role in utilizing the potential of new tech by providing legal certainty.

References

Bentham, Jeremy. (1996). The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198205166.book.1

Dahlman, Carl, et al. (2016). Harnessing the Digital Economy for Developing Countries. OECD Development Centre. Working Paper No. 224

Das, Kusik, et al. (2016). Unlocking Indonesia’s Digital Opportunity. McKinsey&Company.

Iyan, Rita,. Yani. (2012). Peran Hukum dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pembangunan. Vol. 2(5).

Juwana, Hikmahanto. (2005). Politik Hukum UU Bidang Ekonomi di Indonesia. Universitas Sumatra Utara: Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 1(1).

Mackor, Anne R. (2013). Law as an Abstract Object, Law as an Empirical Object: The Relevance of Ontology and Epistemology for Theories of Legislation, the Theory and Practice of Legislation. Vol. 1(3).

McManaman, Linus,. J. (2013). The Legal Philosophy of Roscoe Pound. St. John’s Law Review. Vol. 33(1).

Nemoto, Naoko, et al. (2019). Optimal Regulation of P2P Lending for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise. ADBI. Working Paper Series No. 912. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3313999

OJK Press Conference. (2019, May 3). Number SP 18/DHMS/OJK/V/2019

Pound, Roscoe. (1942). Social Control through Law. Soc. Sci. ENCYC. Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 77/POJK/01/2016 concerning Information Technology-Based Money Lending Service

Satgas Waspada Investasi. (2019). Daftar 168 Entitas Yang Diduga Kejahatan Finansial Online. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Documents/Pages/-SIARAN-PERS-Satgas-Waspada-Investasi-Hentikan-Kegiatan-168-Entitas-Fintech-Ilegal-dan-47-Entitas-Investasi-Ilegal/Daftar%20168%20Entitas%20Fintech%20Ilegal.pdf#search=fintech%20ilegal

Shihata, Ibrahim. (1996). The Role of Law in Business Development. Forham International Law Journal. Vol. 20 (5)

Siallagan, Haposan. (2016). Penerapan Prinsip Negara Hukum di Indonesia. Universitas Padjajaran: Sosiohumaniora. Vol. 18(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9947

Sudaryanto. 2011. The Need for ICT-Education for Manager or Agribusiness man to Increasing Farm Income: Study of Factor Influences on Computer Adoption in East Java Farm Agribusiness. International Journal of Education and Development, JEDICT, Vol 7. No 1.

Sudaryanto and Hanim, Anifatul. 2002. Evaluasi kesiapan UKM Menyongsong Pasar Bebas Asean (AFTA): Analisis Perspektif dan Tinjauan Teoritis. Journal of Economic Accounting and Management. Vol. 1. No. 2

Suryani, T., L., & Iramani, R. (2015). The Challenge of Financial Inclusion for Small and Micro Enterprises in Indonesia. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 1076-1087. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s11.10761087

Tang, Huan. (2019). Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: substitutes or complements?, Paris: The Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy137

Tambunan, Tulus. (2005). Promoting Small and Medium Enterprises with a Clustering Approach: A Policy Experience from Indonesia. Journal of Small Business Management. Vol. 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00130.x

Wantu, Fence., M. (2007). Anatomi dalam Penegakan Hukum oleh Hakim. Faculty of Law Universitas Gadjah Mada: Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 19(3).

World Bank Group (2019). Doing Business 2019 Training for Reform, 16th Edition.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-22

How to Cite

Alwi, A. F., Putra, A. A., Hutami, H. S., Andriany, L. E., & Hanindya, Y. R. (2021). PEER-TO-PEER LENDING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IMPACTS ON MSMES FINANCING IN INDONESIA. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.52.10131023