RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRINCIPALS LEADERSHIP PRACTICES, TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITIES & ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Authors

  • Sailesh Sharma Apeejay Stya University, Gurgaon, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.52.395407

Keywords:

Leadership for Learning, Teachers’ Professional Community, Organizational Commitment, Principals

Abstract

This study attempts to identify the relationship between perception of teachers on leadership practices of their principals, teacher’s professional communities and teachers’ organizational commitment in private secondary schools in National Capital Region in India. To identify the relationship between three variables, survey is conducted in thirty reputed private schools in National Capital Region of India. A survey instrument is developed using different theoretical perspectives from instructional leadership, transformational leadership combined as leadership for learning, teachers professional learning communities and organizational commitment in schools. This survey instrument is used as rating scale comprising different constructs of all the three variables. The instrument is subjected to pilot testing for reliability analysis and validity on a sample of at hundred teachers.  The instrument is administered on 450 teachers from 30 selected schools and data obtained is subjected to analysis using SPSS. The findings reveal that teachers have perceived leadership for learning practices of their principals at moderate level. Teachers have also perceived their organizational commitment and teachers’ professional community at moderate level. It is also found that all of the three variables under study are moderately correlated with each other.

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of vocational behavior, 49(3), 252-276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks. Allyn and Bacon.

Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers' perceived organizational support to job satisfaction: What's empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211223310

Bond, T. (2015). Standards and ethics for counselling in action (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brookfield, S. D. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. New York, NY: Wiley.

Bush, T. (2014). Instructional and transformational leadership: Alternative and complementary models? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 443-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214526830

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2016). School leadership and management in South Africa: Findings from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2014-0101

Chan, W.-Y., Lau, S., Nie, Y., Lim, S., & Hogan, D. (2008). Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 597-630. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208318259

Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., Perry, N. E., & Martin, A. J. (2015). Teachers' beliefs about stress and satisfaction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.002

Gumus, S., & Akcaoglu, M. (2013). Instructional leadership in Turkish primary schools: An Analysis of teachers’ perceptions and current policy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212474801

Gupta, M., & Gehlawat, M. (2013). Job satisfaction and work motivation of secondary school teachers in relation to some demographic variables: A comparative study. Educational Confab, 2(1), 10-19.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hallinger, P. (2013). Measurement properties of the principal instructional management rating scale: Technical Report (5.11). Retrieved from http://philiphallinger.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Technical-Report 5.11.pdf

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445

Hallinger, P., Lee, M., & Ko, U. (2014). Exploring the Impact of School Principals on Teacher Professional Communities in Hong Kong. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(3), 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.901396

Hausman, C. S., & Goldring, E. B. (2014). Teachers’ Ratings of Effective Principal Leadership: A Comparison of Magnet and Nonmagnet Elementary Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 11(11), 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460101100502

Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2011). The Relation Between School Leadership from a Distributed Perspective and Teachers’ Organizational Commitment Examining the Source of the Leadership Function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 728-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11402065

Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.Retrieved from http://home.kku.ac.th/sompong/guest_speaker/KrejcieandMorgan_article.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Kurland, H., & Hasson-Gilad, D. R. (2015). Organizational learning and extra effort: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Teaching and teacher education, 49, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.010

Lee, H. Y., & Ahmad, K. Z. B. (2009). The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationships between leadership behavior and organizational commitment and between organizational commitment and job satisfaction and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730910927106

Lee, M., Louis, K., & Anderson, S. (2012). Local education authorities and student learning: the effects of policies and practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.652125

Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X94030004006

Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of Transformational school leadership a meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268

Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035

Ling, S. L. M., & Ibrahim, M. S. B. (2013). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment in secondary schools of Sarawak. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies, 2(2), 51-65.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (2004). TCM employee commitment survey academic users guide 2004. London, Ontario, Canada: The University of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://employeecommitment.com/TCM-Employee-Commitment-Survey-Academic-Package-2004.pdf.

Murphy, A. F., & Torff, B. (2016). Growing pains: The effect of Common Core State Standards on perceived teacher effectiveness. The Educational Forum, 80(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2015.1102999

Nagar, K. (2012). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction among teachers during times of burnout. Vikalpa, 37(2), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920120205

Nesje, K. (2016). Personality and professional commitment of students in nursing, social work, and teaching: A comparative survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 53, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.001

Noordin, F., Rashid, R. M., Ghani, R., Rasimah, A. & Darus, Z. (2010). Teacher professionalization and organizational commitment: Evidence from Malaysia. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 49-52. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v9i2.521

Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership. Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Premavathy, P. (2010). The relationship of instructional leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment and students’ achievement in small schools. (Master’s thesis, University Science Malaysia, USM). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11973018.pdf.

Raman, A., Ling, C. C., & Khalid, R. (2015). Relationship between school climate and teachers’ commitment in an Excellent School of Kubang Pasu District, Kedah, Malaysia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s1p163

Robinson, V. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Winmalee, NSW: Australian Council of Leaders.

Sharma, S. (2016). Leadership for learning beyond instructional-lessons from Indian private school principals. Research Chronicler. 4(1), 50-61

Sharma,S.,Barnett,B.G, Chua,Y.P, Mei,W.L and Maloud ,S.a (2018). Instructional Leadership: A Systematic Review of Malaysian Literature 1995-2015.Educational Leader, 6,50-63.

Shirzadi, R., Shad, J. R., Nasiri, M., Abdi, H., & Khani, S. (2013). The relation of organizational climate and job motivation with organizational commitment of new employed teachers of physical education of educations and training administration in Kermanshah Province. Advances in Environmental Biology, 7(13), 4084-4088.

Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316102237672

Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 499-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106

Walker, A. D., Lee, M., & Bryant, D. A. (2014). How much of a difference do principals make? An analysis of between-school’s variation in academic achievement in Hong Kong public secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 602-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.875044

Yalabik, Z. Y., Van Rossenberg, Y., Kinnie, N., & Swart, J. (2015). Engaged and committed? The relationship between work engagement and commitment in professional service firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26, 1602-1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.953972

Yousaf, A., Yang, H., & Sanders, K. (2015). Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task and contextual performance of Pakistani professionals: The mediating role of commitment foci. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2012-0277

Downloads

Published

2019-08-30

How to Cite

Sharma, S. (2019). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRINCIPALS LEADERSHIP PRACTICES, TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITIES & ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.52.395407