SEE & SAY: UTILIZING VISUALS TO STIMULATE NOVICE LEARNERS’ VERBALIZATION OF IDEAS IN THE TARGET LANGUAGE
Keywords:Visual Literacy, SOLO Taxonomy, Still Graphics, English Language Learners
The rise of information technology has transformed our way of communicating to each other as visuals have become as significant as verbal messages. Novice English language learners usually find it difficult to orally verbalize their understanding and ideas when they are given word-based texts. This research aimed to elicit oral responses from English language learners towards wordless still graphics by encouraging them to decode visuals through a specific strategy. The strategy is a set of hierarchical steps developed according to the model of understanding known as Structured Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy with elements from several techniques including Visible Thinking Routine. The subjects were an intact class of 12 students of lower English language proficiency. Their responses towards a series of visuals were analyzed through concept maps. The findings revealed that they were able to orally verbalize their thoughts towards the visuals. This was an improvement from the initial reluctance and limited oral production they exhibited towards word-based texts. It is likely that wordless visuals might be as effective or probably more effective than words in eliciting ideas and language outputs from novice students. Hence, it is essential to consider viewing as the fifth language skill.
“Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age” (2003). Retrieved September 27, 2017 from http://www.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf
“Teaching English” (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/chrysapap/favourite-activity-see-think-wonder
“Visible Thinking”. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.pz.harvard.edu/tc/routines.cfm
Adler, C.R (2001). Put reading first: the research building blocks for teachings children to read. National Institute for Literacy.
Alan., Bryman, (2011). Business research methods. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Alvermann, D. & Hagood, M. (2000). Critical media literacy: Research, theory, and practice in ‘new times'. Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 193.
Arizpe, E. (2001). ‘Letting the story out’: Visual encounters with Anthony Browne’s The Tunnel. Reading, 35(3), 115.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL)”. (2011). Retrieved October 3, 2017 from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy
Baker, F. W. (2012). Media Literacy in the K–2 Classroom. International Society for Technology in Education.
Barrot, J. (2014). Development and validation of materials for isolated form-focused instruction. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4(1), 267–282.
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Britain Broadcasting Corp.
Biggs, J.B., and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning-the SOLO Taxonomy (1st ed). New York: Academic Press.
Brinton, D.M. (2001) ‘The use of Media in Language Teaching’, in Celce-Murcia, M. (ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp.459-475). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial learner. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 19‐46.
Brumberger, E. R. (2005). Visual thetoric in the curriculum. Pedagogy for a Multimodal Workplace, 68(3), 318-333.
Canning-Wilson, C. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal. Retrieved March 17, 2018 from http://itestlj.org/articles/canning-video.html
Chanlin, L. (1998). Animation to teach students of different knowledge levels. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(3), 166-175.
Chanlin, L. (1999). Gender differences and the need for visual control. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 329-335.
Clark, R. C. & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning: proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluation visuals in training materials. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Cooper, L.Z. (2002). Consideration in cross-cultural use of visual information with children for whom English is a second language. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22 (2), 219-235.
Dalton, S. (1985). The Directed Seeing Thinking Activity (DSTA) and the Directed Listening Thinking Activity (DLTA). Center for Development of Early Education.
Dart, B. & Boulton-Lewis, G. (1998). Teaching and learning in higher education. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Elkins, J. (2003). Visual studies: A skeptical introduction. New York and London: Routledge. Felten, P. (2008). “Visual Literacy.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 40 (6). 60-64.
Ford, S. M. (2010), Visual Literacy: How Do They Do It?. Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 68.
Gabinete, M. K. L. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in assessing the viewing skill of ESL learners. E-journal, 7 (1), 19-28.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lewin, T. (2010, January 20). If your kids are awake, they’re probably online. The New York Times, pp. A1.
Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64-73.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O'Neil, K. E. (2011). Reading pictures: Developing visual literacy for greater comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 214‐223.
Potter, M.K & Kustra, E. (2012). A Primer on Learning Outcomes and the SOLO Taxonomy. Course Design for Constructive Alignment. Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Windsor.
Rawlinson, K., Wood, S., Osterman, M., Sulllivan, C.,. (2007, Summer). Thinking critically about social issues through visual material. The Journal of Museum Education, 32(2), 155-174.
Richards, C. (2012). Assessment as the key to transforming future higher education? ICTs, active learning, and outcomes-based education (Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Schoen, M. J. (2015). Teaching Visual Literacy Skills in a One-Shot Session. VRA Bulletin, 41 (1), 1-12.
Sinatra, R. (1986). Visual literacy connections to thinking, reading and writing. Springfield, IL.
Stokes, S. (2001). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literature perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1 (1), 10-19.
Taboada, A., Bianco, S., & Bowerman, V. (2012). Text-based questioning: A comprehension strategy to build English language learners’ content knowledge. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(2), 87-109.
Thompson, P.B. (2007). Agricultural sustainability: What it is and what it is not International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 5, 5-16
Tillmann, A. (2012). What we see and why it matters: how competency in visual literacy can enhance student learning. Honors Projects. Paper 9. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/education_honproj/9
White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Yeh, H. & Lohr, L. (2010). Towards evidence of visual literacy: Assessing pre-service teachers' perceptions of instructional visuals. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29(2), 183-197.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.