THE IMPACT OF TEACHING TOPICAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS ON WRITING PERFORMANCE OF TURKISH EFL SPEAKERS

Authors

  • Gökhan Çepni PhD Student, English Laguage Teaching Depatment, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
  • Erdoğan Bada Professor, English Laguage Teaching Depatment, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.51.366378

Keywords:

Writing, Writing Quality, Coherence, Topical Structure Analysis

Abstract

As coherence is abstract in nature and there are very few practical techniques to teach it, this is considered to be one of the main problems that EFL students and teachers encounter. Although there is considerable research analyzing problems and difficulties with coherence among EFL learners, few practical pedagogical strategies have been suggested that can be used by teachers and understood by learners. Topical Structure Analysis is one of such techniques suggested and could be taught to EFL learners in order to help them improve their writing skills. This experimental study sheds light on the effects of teaching Topical Structure Analysis to Turkish university students who learn English as a foreign language. Two groups with four participants in each were used for this research. While one group was subjected to Topical Structure Analysis treatment (experimental group) for six weeks, the other received no such training. At the end of such a training period, both groups were assigned writing tasks which were analyzed for coherence. The results obtained indicate that a considerably positive effect of teaching Topical Structure Analysis was observed on the writings of experimental group, while the participants of the control group remained relatively poor performers of coherence in their writings. 

References

Almaden, D. O. 2006, An analysis of the topical structure of paragraphs written by Filipino students. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 15 (1), 127-153.

Attelisi A. Abdulhameed. (2012). The Impact of Teaching Topical Structure Analysis on EFL Writing with Special Reference to Undergraduate Students in Libya (PhD Dissertation). Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10443/1619

Carreon, M. E.C ., 2006, Unguarded patterns of thinking: physical and topical structure analysis of student journals. Asia-Pacific Education Research. 15 (1), 155-182.

Chiang, S. Y., 1999, Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: The case of French as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (2), 219-232.

Chiu, Y. F., 2004, Coaching a student to develop coherence based on topical structure analysis: A case study. Journal of Language and Learning: 2 (2), 154 – 170.

Connor, U. and Farmer, M., 1990, The teaching of topical structure analysis as a revision strategy for ESL writers. In B. Kroll (Ed), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom. 126-139, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fan, Y. & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Topical structure analysis as an alternative learning strategy for coherent writing. Journal of Applied English, 1, 115-137.

Hughes, A., 2003. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland,K.,2003a. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press(p228)

Hyland,K.,2003b. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp 243,244).

Kılıç, M.,Genç, B., Bada, E. (2016). Topical Structure in Argumentative Essays of EFL Learners and Implications for Writing Classes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 107-116.

Lautamatti, L., 1987. Observation on the development of the topic of simplified discourse. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (Eds), Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 Texts. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley, 92-126.

Lee, I., 2002a, Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11:135- 159.

Lee, I., 2002b, Helping students develop coherence in writing. English Language Teaching Forum, 32-39.

Nunan, D. (1994). On the psychological plausibility of ‘topic’ as a construct in research on writing. Hong Kong.

Sakontawut, N. (2003). Functional sentence perspective and second language composition: A study of revision process in a writing workshop for Thai college students. PhD dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Simpson, J. M., 2000, Topical structure analysis of academic paragraphs in English and Spanish. Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (3), 293–309.

Todd,R. W., Khongput, S.,Darasawang, P.,2007, Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays. Assessing Writing, 12, 10– 25.

Witte, S. P., and Faigley, L., 1981, Coherence, Cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and Communication 32,189- 204.

Witte, S.P. 1983a.Topical structure and revision: An exploratory study. College Composition and Communication 34, no. 3, 313-341.

Witte, S.P. 1983b,Topical structure and writing quality: Some possible text- based explanations of readers' judgements of students' writing. Visible Language 17, 177- 205.

Yule, G. (2006). The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-29

How to Cite

Çepni, G., & Bada, E. (2019). THE IMPACT OF TEACHING TOPICAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS ON WRITING PERFORMANCE OF TURKISH EFL SPEAKERS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.51.366378