STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOURAL PATTERNS ON BACHELOR’S DEGREE CHOICES IN SRI LANKA: HEURISTICS?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.763785Keywords:
Heuristics, Behavioural Patterns, Factor Analysis, tudents’ Choice, Bachelor’s degree, Higher Education, PeerAbstract
At present National university intake in Sri Lanka has become progressively competitive due to the limited number of placements. Consequently, several private higher educational institutes (PHEIs) in Sri Lanka entered into the higher education market with various international degree programmes of top-ranked foreign universities to cater to the need of university-level education in Sri Lanka. Therefore, this study attempts to uncover the behavioural patterns of students in selecting a Bachelor’s degree (BD) from International Degree Programmes which emerged recently in Sri Lanka. Subsequently, the data for the study were collected by 420 first-year students of International Degree Programmes by administering a questionnaire with 59 predefined variables. Of those, 36 variables and 42 variables were identified as the most influential variables by factor analysis for the male and female group respectively. Thereby, it has determined that 'marketing strategy', 'university characteristics', 'infrastructure facilities', 'programme evaluation' and 'reputation of the university' were the common influential factors for both the groups but with different orders of importance. Alternatively, the 'peer' and 'sources of information' are rated as influential in selecting a BD only by the male group. Even though the female group have not remarked any 'information sources’ as influential, they rated the 'first impression' of the PHEI impact them in selecting the BD. However, 'financial support' and 'cost' are influential factors for the male group while 'cost' is not imperative for the female students in selecting their BD. Finally, higher education student-choice model was developed based on the heuristics of Sri Lankan students. Indeed the results of this study can be beneficial in optimising the enrolment strategies of PHEIs in Sri Lanka and in guiding prospective students on their BD choices in higher education.
References
Abeygunawardena, K. A. V. (2018). Influential Factors in Selecting a Bachelor’s Degree from Private Higher Educational Institutes in Sri Lanka: A Study Based on Undergraduates of International Degree Programmes. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.7596
Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J., I. (2004). Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: The voter’s illusion and the belief in personal relevance. Political Psychology, 25(1), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x
Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004333
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Pruitt, J. S. (1996). Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision making research. Human Factors, 38(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096779048066 https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089606380202
Ceja, M. (2004). Chicana College Aspirations and the Role of Parents: Developing Educational Resiliency. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(4), 338-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192704268428
Ceja, M. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as information sources in the college choice process of Chicana students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0003
Crow, S. M., Fok, L. Y., Hartman, S. J., & Payne, D. M. (1991). Gender and values: What is the impact on decision making?. Sex Roles, 25(3/4), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289858
Daily mirror. (2017, February 27). Non-state actors in higher education in Sri Lanka: Issue and challenges. Retrived from http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Non-state-actors-in-higher-education-in-Sri-Lanka-Issues-and-challenges-124528.html
De Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938-956. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938
Demetris, V., Alkis, T., & Yioula, M. (2007). A contemporary higher education student-choice model for developed countries. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 979-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.023
Domino, S., Libraire, T., Lutwiller, D., Superczynski, S., & Tian, R. (2006). Higher education marketing concerns: factors influence students’ choice of colleges. The Business Review, Cambridge, 6(2), 101-111.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic. Psychological Science, 17(4), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x
Falindah, P. S., Razak, K. A., & Rohaizat, B. (2010). International students’ choice behavior for higher education at Malaysian private universities. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(2), 202–211.
Fernandez, J. L. (2010). An exploratory study of factors influencing the decision of students to study at University Sains Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 28(2), 107-136.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.75
Halpern, D. F. (1997). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought and Knowledge. (1st Ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hamrick, F. A., & Hossler, D. (1996). Diverse information-gathering methods in the post-secondary decision-making process. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1996.0029
Hatala, R., & Case, S, M. (2000). Examining the influence of gender on medical students’ decision making. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender Based Medicine, 9, 617-623. https://doi.org/10.1089/15246090050118143
Hawkins, K., & Power, ChB. (1999). Gender differences in questions asked during small decision-making group discussions. Small Group Research, 30, 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000205
Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2008). Recognition users of the recognition heuristic. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 394-401. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.394
Hossler, D., Schmit, J., & Vesper, N. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jullisson, E. A., Karlsson, N., & Garling, T. (2005). Weighing the past and the future in decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(4), 561-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000159
Keling, S. B. A. (2006). Institutional factors attracting students to Malaysian institutions of higher learning. International Review of Business Research Papers, 2(1), 46-64.
Knight, J. (2012). Student mobility and internationalisation: Trends and tribulations. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2012.7.1.20
Maniu, I., & Maniu, G. C. (2014). A model of students’ university decision making behaviour. SEA – Practical Application of Science, 2(3), 431–436.
Maria, L. L., Maria, T. S. A. B., & Maria, C. E. (2007). Factors that affect decision making: Gender and Age differences. USA. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7 (3), 381-391.
McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: SUNY Press.
McKelvie, S. J. (2000). Quantifying the availability heuristic with famous names. North American Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 347-357.
Moogan, Y. J., & Baron S. (2003). An analysis of student characteristics within the student decision-making process. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000098699
Narayan, S. M., & Corcoran-Perry, S. (1997). Line of reasoning as a representation of nurses’ clinical decision making. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<353::AID-NUR8>3.0.CO;2-F
Nora, A. (2004). The Role of habitus and cultural capital in choosing a college, transitioning from high school to higher education, and persisting in college among minority and monminority students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 180-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192704263189
Ozga, J., & Sukhnandan, L. (1998). Undergraduate non‐completion: developing an explanatory model. Higher Education Quarterly, 52(3), 316-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00100
Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2006). On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 983-1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.983
Pimpa, N., & Suwannapirom, S. (2008). Thai students’ choices of vocational education: marketing factors and reference groups. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-007-9035-9
Redelmeier, D. A. (2005). The cognitive psychology of missed diagnosis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(2), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-2-200501180-00010
Sagi, A., & Friedland, N. (2007). The cost of richness: The effect of the size and diversity of decision sets on post-decision regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.515
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for Business students. (6th Ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
Rahayu, S. H., Tan, H. S., & Samsinar, Md. S. (2000). Marketing analysis of higher education service sector in Malaysia: Consumer perspective. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(1), 1- 6.
Somers, P., Haines, K., Keene, B., Bauer, J., Pfeiffer, M., McCluskey, J., & Sparks, B. (2006). Towards a theory of choice for community college students. Community College Journal Research and Practice, 30(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920500248886
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 672-695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672
Sunday times, (2011, June 12). University entrance for London A/L students in Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110612/Education/ed26.html
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. (6th Ed.). United Kingdom: Pearson.
Tang, T. L., Tang, D. S., & Tang, C. S. (2004). College tuition and perceptions of Private University Quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(5), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410543457
University Grants Commission, Sri Lanka : Website : www.ugc.ac.l
Venkatesh, V, Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2896
Wood, J.T. (1990). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Yamamoto, G.T. (2006). University evaluationselection: A Turkish case. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(7), 559-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610704654
Yorke, M. (1999). Leaving early: Undergraduate non-completion in higher education. London: Falmer Press.
Yusof, M., Ahmad, S. N. B., Tajudin, M., & Ravindran, R. (2008). A study of Factors Influencing the Selection of a Higher Education Institution. UNITAR e-journal, 4(2), 27-40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
