THE NEW CRITERIA FOR EXPERT EVIDENCE IN BRITISH COURTS – CASE LAW, STATUTORY RULES AND A NEGLIGENCE CASE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.43.458473Keywords:
Expert Witness, Expert Evidence, Expert Admissibility, Criminal Procedure Rules, Negligence, Case StudyAbstract
This work aims to analyse the legislation proposed by The Law Commission in Great Britain in order to establish statutory criteria for expert evidence in court. The proposal is assessed against the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Rules (CPR) initiated by The Government. From this comparison implications for expert witnesses are derived. For illustrative purposes, the case study of fictitious divorce proceedings of Peter Morgan is dealt with. The study shows legal remedies available to a party against its expert witness in negligence cases. Methodologically, expert evidence admissibility criteria are discussed on the background of common law rules and the Criminal Procedure Rules (2015). Legal academic literature is consulted to enrich the argument. The findings show that the Criminal Procedure Rules (2015) are rooted in settled case law, albeit stressing expertise enhancement and professional qualifications. The discussion of the Peter Morgan case study provides for a legal route for negligence claims based on the case law of Jones v Kaney. The originality of this work is based upon a thorough analysis of case law and legal writings, with the focus on newly introduced Criminal Procedure Rules and recent landmark cases.
References
Abbott, N. S. (2011). Expert Witness or Litigant Expert? Don’t Take Your Expert For Granite. The Canadian Geotechnical Society. Retrieved from: https://www.cgs.ca/pdf/2011%20-%20Expert%20Witness%20of%20Litigant%20Expert.pdf
Bal, B. S. (2009). The Expert Witness in Medical Malpractice Litigation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467(2), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0634-4
Brian, D. J., & Cruickshank, A. (2017). Police officers giving evidence: Discussing gaps, contradictions and next steps. The Police Journal Theory, Practice and Principles, 90(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X16674022
Case, P. (2016). Dangerous Liaisons? Psychiatry and Law in the Court of Protection—Expert Discourses of ‘Insight’ (and ‘Compliance’). Medical Law Review, 24(3), 360-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww027
Civil Justice Council (2009). Protocol for the Instruction of Experts to give Evidence in Civil Claims. Retrieved from: https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/contents/form_section_images/practice_directions/pd35_pdf_eps/pd35_prot.pdf
Cooper, P. (2011, May 20). Call yourself an expert? New Law Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/call-yourself-expert
Doyle, H., & Fentem, R. (2011). Expert Evidence: Back to Basics and Recent Hot Topics. Retrieved from: http://www.guildhallchambers.co.uk/files/ExpertEvidenceBackToBasics_and_RecentHotTopics.doc
Edmond, G., & Roberts, A. (2011). Procedural Fairness, the Criminal Trial and Forensic Science and Medicine. Sydney Law Review, 33, 359-394.
Expert Witness Institute (2005). The Expert Witness Institute Code of Practice. Retrieved from: http://www.pragmaconsulting.net/downloads/Expert%20witness%20code%20of%20practice%20Academy%20of%20Experts.pdf
Freckelton, I. (2012). Case Commentary. Civil Liability of Health Practitioners for their Forensic Work: Further Erosion of the Witness Immunity Rule Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13; [2011] 2 All ER 671, [2011] 2 WLR 823. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19(4), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.717247
Forensic Science Regulator (2015). Newsletter October 2015. No 26. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/470526/FSR_Newsletter_26__October_2015.pdf
Goldberg, R. (2011). Medical Malpractice and Compensation in the UK. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 87(1), 131-161.
Goodliffe, J., & Brooke, D. (1996). Alcoholism in the legal profession. Retrieved from: http://www.articles.jgoodliffe.co.uk/articles/allegpr1.htm
Great Britain. The Law Commission (2009). The Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales. A New Approach to the Determination of Evidentiary Reliability. Consultation Paper 190. Retrieved from: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/cp190_Expert_Evidence_Consultation.pdf
Great Britain. The Law Commission (2011). Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales. London: The Stationery Office.
Great Britain. The Ministry of Justice (2013). The Government’s response to the Law Commission report: Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales. (Law Com No 325). London: The Ministry of Justice.
Griffiths, J. R. (2000). The law of negligence. In: M. Drury (Ed.), Clinical Negligence in General Practice (pp. 43-72). Abington: Redcliff Medical Press Ltd.
Henneberg, M. (2015). Admissibility Frameworks and Scientific Evidence: Controversies in Relation to Shaken Baby Syndrome / Abusive Head Trauma. British Journal of American Legal Studies, 4(2), 555-584.
Herstein, O. J. (2010). Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is not a Duty “To Try”. Law Faculty Publications. Paper 127. Retrieved from: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/127 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900004987
Jackson, A., & Stockdale, M. (2015). R (on the application of Wright) v the Crown Prosecution Service: admissibility of expert evidence an Criminal Practice Direction Part 33A (Case Comment). The Journal of Criminal Law, 79(4), 246-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018315597852
Khalafi, N. (2014). Workplace sleepiness: causes, consequences and countermeasures. Master Thesis. Missouri University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from: http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/index.3.html#year_2013
Laird, D. (2018). False Expert Witness Testimony in a Medical Negligence Case. Journal of Legal Medicine, 34, 44-46.
Lazo, K. C. (2018). Practice to Policy: Assessing Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Health Policy in Greater Manchester. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(29), 1051-1070.
Livesey, M. C. (2017). The Effectiveness of Expert Evidence. Paper presented at the Australian Bar Association Conference 2017. Retrieved from: http://austbar.asn.au/uploads/pdfs/abaconf2017/Livesey_QC,_Mark_The_Effectiveness_of_Expert_Evidence.pdf
Maeder, E. M., McManus, L. A., McLaughlin, K. J., Yamamoto, S., Stewart, H., & Walla P. (2016). Jurors’ perceptions of scientific testimony: The role of gender and testimony complexity in trials involving DNA evidence. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1264657
Marks, D. W. (1989). Professional Negligence: Contribution and Contributory Negligence. The University of Queensland Law Journal, 15(2), 209-227.
McKie, I. A. J. (2012). Expert Evidence: Reliability and Relevance. Retrieved from: http://www.shirleymckie.com/documents/Expertpapersummary17313.pdf
Ming, K. L. Y. (2003). A Duty to Care: Pharmacists’ Negligence: Implications for Pharmacists and Lessons Arising. Allied Health Professions, 5, 1-9.
Moore, D. (2003). The Boundaries of Negligence. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 4(1), 339-365. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1065
Ormerod, D. C., & Barsby, C. (2002). Case Comment – Evidence: prosecution relying on expert evidence relating to ear prints. Criminal Law Review, 821-823.
Powers, M. (2017). Expert witnesses: stuck between the courts and the GMC. BMJ British Medical Journal, 357. Retrieved from https://www.bmj.com/content/357/bmj.j2034 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2034
Price, P. (2018). Current and future challenges facing medico-legal experts – An expert’s view. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 23(3), 109-113.
Raposo, V. L. (2015). How Can Asian Countries Deal with Medical Liabilty and Patient Compensation. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(19; 942-956.
Roberts, P. (2016). LTDNA Evidence on Trial. Frontier in Genetics, 7(180), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00180
Rothwell, R. (2010, November 23). Forensic expert witnesses should be accredited, warns judge. The Law Society Gazette. Retrieved from: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/58151.article
Rozenberg, J. (2014, October 15). Are juries being blinded by science? The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/oct/15/juries-blinded-science-lord-chief-justice-primers
Sales P. (2012). Judges and Legislature: Values into Law. Cambridge Law Journal, 71(2), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000499
Schatzki, M. (2009). Negotiation. The Art of Getting What You Want. New York: Signet Books.
Shapiro, D. (2011). Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13. Expert Witness: now liable for inexpert evidence. Retrieved from: http://www.crownofficechambers.com/assets/docs/news/jones_v_kaney_article.pdf
Sutherland, R. (2009). Expert Evidence – The Role, Duties and Responsibilities of the Expert Witness in Litigation. Paper presented at the Expert Witness Training Seminar by Terra Firma Chambers, Edinburgh. Retrieved from: http://www.terrafirmachambers.com/articles/ExpertEvidence-RoleDutiesandResponsibilitiesoftheExpertWitnessinCourtProceedings.pdf
The Expert Witness Institute (2005). Code of Practice for Experts. London: The Academy of Experts.
Tromans, C. (2011, August 18). Expert Witnesses. The Law Society Gazette. Retrieved from: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/expert-witnesses/61815.article
Van Dellen, A. (2011, November 04). The aftershock. New Law Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/aftershock
Wall, W. (2009). Forensic Science in Court: The role of the Expert Witness. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ward. T. (2013). Expert evidence and the Law Commission: implementation without legislation? Criminal Law Review, 7, 561-576.
Zipursky, B. (2009). Foreseeability in Breach, Duty, and Proximity Cause. Wake Forest Law Review, 44, 1247-1275.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
