A GOOD LEADER BASED ON GRADUATING STUDENTS’ DRAWINGS: A SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS APPROACH

Authors

  • Jari Martikainen Ingman College of Crafts and Design, Toivala, Finland University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.43.5775

Keywords:

Leadership, Graduating Students, Social Representations Theory, Physical Appearance, Visual Nonverbal Communication

Abstract

This research examines graduating students’ conceptions of a good leader and how positive leadership qualities are communicated visually. In order to address this research task, fifteen graduating students in a Finnish upper-secondary vocational college were asked to draw a picture of a good leader and elucidate their drawings verbally. Theoretically, the research draws on the theory of social representations and regards the participants’ drawings as reflecting social representations of leadership among graduating students in Finland. The data were analyzed using content analysis. The results show that students regarded a good leader as approachable, caring, supportive, and responsible, as communicated through an either formal or casual but neat physical appearance. This research provides information on graduating students’ conceptions of leadership. In addition, it shows the important role leaders’ visual nonverbal behavior plays in terms of communicating leadership qualities. The results of this research can provide valuable information for leaders and recruiters on what kinds of assumptions and expectations future employees have of leaders, and what should be taken into consideration when meeting newcomers to the labor market in, for instance, a job interview.  In the future, it would be interesting to conduct a similar research with a larger group of participants consisting of students at various levels of education. In addition, it would be interesting to study the conceptions of leadership among students coming from various cultural backgrounds. 

References

Amah, O. E. (2018). Determining the antecedents and outcomes of servant leadership. Journal of General Management, 43(8), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307017749634

Amegbe, H., Owino, J. O., & Kerubo, O. L. (2017). Behavioural responses to corporate image building through social media advertising: A study among Nairobi students. Journal of Creative Communication, 12(3), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258617725607

Anninos, L. N. (2018). Narcissistic business leaders as herald of the self-proclaimed excellence. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 10(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-01-2017-001

Aravena, F. (2017). Destructive leadership behaviour: An explanatory study in Chile. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1-14. https://doi.org.10.1080/15700763.2017.1384501

Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2014). Social cognition. An integrated introduction. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: Sage.

Avelia, J. R. (2017). The dilemma of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(2), 42-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21522

Ben-Asher, S. (2003). Hegemonic, emancipated, and polemic social representations: Parental dialogue regarding Israeli naval commandos’ training in polluted water. Papers in Social Representations, 12, 6.1-6.12. http:// www.psr. jku.at/

Bhothisawang, P. (2017). The demand of democratic leader in Southeast Asia: A case of Thai society. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 911-936. https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.911936

Caldwell, C., & Anderson, V. (2017). Ethical leadership in troubled times. International Journal of Public Leadership, 13(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-01-2017-0006

Chaudhry, A. Q., & Javed, H. (2012). Impact of transactional and laissez faire leadership style on motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 258-264.

Congo-Poottaren, N., & Beebeejaun-Rojee S. (2017). Turning the flashlight on human resources in schools: A case study in a secondary school in Mauritius. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 165-187. https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.165187

Foels, R. E., Driskell, J., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction: An integration. Small Group Research, 31(31), 676-701. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100603

Ford, J., Harding, N. H., Gilmore, S., & Richardson, S. (2017). Becoming the leader: Leadership as material presence. Organization Studies, 38(11), 1553-1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616677633

Gil-Glazer, Y. (2017). Visual culture and critical pedagogy: From theory to practice. Critical Studies in Education, 06/28/2017, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1292298

Glăveanu, V. P. (2009). What differences make a difference? A discussion of hegemony, resistance and representation. Papers on Social Representations, 18, 2.1-2.22.

Grabo, A., & van Vugt, M. (2016). Charismatic leadership and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution & Human Behavior, 37(5), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.005

Hall, J. A., & Mast, M. S. (2007). Sources of accuracy in the emphatic accuracy paradigm. Emotion, 7(2), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.438

Hoffrén, M., Syvärinen, S., & Laulainen, S. (2017). Tuhoavan johtamisen rakentuminen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon johtamiskuvauksissa. [Destructive leadership based on leadership descriptions in the field of social and health care.] Työelämän tutkimus [The Finnish Association of Work Life Research], 2017(1), 47-65.

Hughes, A., Johnson, T. L., Edgar, L. D., Miller, J. D., & Cox, C. (2016). A content and visual analysis of promotional pieces used in a communication campaign for the Arkansas [commodity] promotion Board. Journal of Applied Communications, 100(2), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1027

Höijer, B. (2011). Social representations theory. A new theory for media research. Nordicom Review, 21(2), 3-16.

Jian, H., Chen, Y., Sun, P., & Yang, J. (2017). The relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees’ deviant workplace behavior: The mediating effects of psychological contract violation and organizational cynicism. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00732

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2013). Educational research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.

Kaprāns, M. (2015). Hegemonic representations of the past and digital agency: Giving meaning to “The Soviet Story” on social networking sites. Memory Studies, 9(2), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015587151

Khan, M. S., Khan, I., Qureshi, A. Q., Ismail, H. M., Rauf, H., Latif, A., & Tahir, M. (2015). The styles of leadership: A critical review. Public Policy and Administration Research, 5(3), 87-92.

Ko, C., Ma, J., Bartnik, R., Haney, M. H., & Kang, M. (2018). Ethical leadership: An integrative review and future research agenda. Ethics & Behavior, 28(2), 104-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1318069

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, (10)2, 269-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366

Ling, Q., Liu, F., & Wu, X. (2017). Servant versus authentic leadership. Assessing effectiveness in China’s hospitality industry. Conrell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965516641515

Little, A. C. (2014). Facial appearance and leader choice in different contexts: Evidence for task contingent selection based on implicit and learned face-behaviour/face-ability associations. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 865-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.002

Liuzza, M. T., Cazzato, V., Crostella, F., Caprara, G. V., & Aglioti, S. M. (2011). Follow my eyes: The gaze of politicians reflexively captures the gaze of ingroup voters. PLoS ONE, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025117

Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348684

Mannay, D. (2016). Visual, narrative and creative research methods. Application, reflection and ethics. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

Martikainen, J. (2017). Categorizing leaders based on their gaze. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1603-1618. https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.16031618

Martikainen, J., & Hujala, A. (2017). Johtajuuden visuaaliset kategoriat [Visual categories of leadership]. Sosiologia, 54(1), 43-62.

Montepare, J. M. (2010). Cue, view, action: An ecological approach to person perception. In E. Balcetis, & G. D. Lassiter (Eds.), Social psychology of visual perception (pp. 299-232). New York, Hove: Psychology Press.

Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Edited by Gerard Duveen. New York: New York University Press.

Mubarak, F., Noor, A., & Nunn, S. (2018). Effect of authentic leadership on employee creativity in project-based organizations with the mediating roles of work engagement and psychological empowerment. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1429348

Nagel, F., Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62, 833-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01670.x

Nana, E., Jackson, B., & St. J. Burch, G. (2010). Attributing leadership personality and effectiveness from the leader’s face: An exploratory study. Leaderhip & Organization Development Journal, 31(8), 720-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011094775

Nevicka, B., De Hoogh, A. H. B., Den Hartog, D. N., & Beschak, F. D. (2018). Narcissistic leaders and their victims: Followers low of self-esteem and low on core self-evaluations suffer most. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00422

Privetti, M., Melotti, G., & Bonomo, M. (2017). An exploration of social representations of the Roma woman in Italy and Brazil: Psychosocial anchoring to emotional reactions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 58, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.03.001

Quraishi, U., & Aziz, F. (2018). An investigation of authentic leadership and teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviour in secondary schools of Pakistan. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1437670

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.

Ruben. D. D., & Gigliotti, R. A. (2016). Leadership as social influence: An expanded view of leadership communication theory and practice. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(4), 467-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816641876

Sacavém, A., Martinez, L. F., Vieira da Cunha, J., Abreu, A. M., & Johnson, S. K. (2017). Charismatic leadership: A study on delivery styles, mood, and performance. Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(3), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21519

Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., & Gaskell, G. (2015). Social representations: A revolutionary paradigm. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 3-11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Stroker, J. I., Garretsen, H., & Spreeuwers, L. J. (2016). The facial appearance of CEO:s: Faces signal selection but not performance. PLoS ONE, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159950

Talley, L., & Temple, S. (2015). How leaders influence followers through the use of nonverbal communication. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 36(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2013-0107

Uleman, J. S., Blader, S. L., & Todorov, A. (2005). Implicit impressions. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 362-392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wang, H., & Guan, B. (2018). The positive effect of authoritarian leadership on employee performance: The moderating role of power distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00357

Wiggs Harris, W. (2013). Nursing leadership lessons: An association executive’s perspective. In G. Glazer, & J. J. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Nursing leadership from the outside in (pp. 109-124). New York: Springer.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-15

How to Cite

Martikainen, J. (2018). A GOOD LEADER BASED ON GRADUATING STUDENTS’ DRAWINGS: A SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS APPROACH. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.43.5775