• Ezhra B. Bahala Master of Arts in Education, Major in Educational Leadership and Management, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines
  • Rene P. Onrubia Master of Arts in Education, Major in Educational Leadership and Management, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines
  • Lorraine Bernal Master of Arts in Education, Major in Educational Leadership and Management, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines
  • Patricia Mae Madrigal Master of Arts in Education, Major in Educational Leadership and Management, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines
  • John Edwardson Adan Master of Arts in Education. Major in Educational Leadership and Management, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines




Educational Leadership, Principalship, Public High School, Private High School, Leadership Style, Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Student, Student Outcome, Student Achievement, Leadership, School


The study aims to understand the relationship between the principal’s leadership style of both public and private high school institutions and student's performance in Math, Science and English. Support was found in a Theoretical model: Principal leadership effects on student's learning growth in Mathematics (Dumay, Boonen, and Dame, 2013) which reinforces the relationship between principal leadership and student achievement.For this study, the researchers aim to focus on three hypotheses: identification of the difference between the teacher's perception of the principal leadership style between private and public high school; the effects of such leadership styles and variables to the student achievement in each of the three general subjects (Mathematics, English, and Science); the effects of the dominant characteristics to the student achievements in general. Fifty-three teachers, both from private and public institutions, were administered the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5X-Short form (MLQ 5X-Short). This measured all nine leadership characteristics and identified which type of leadership was dominantly displayed by their principal, for each school type. The study also examined the self-assessment of the principals for each school type and compared it to the perceptions of the teachers towards their leadership styles.Most findings were consistent with existing literature. In addition, this study also identified several areas of further study. 


Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Barry A. Vann. Aaron N. Coleman, J. A. (2014, April 9). Development of the Vannsimpco Leadership Survey: A delination of hybrid leadership styles. SBS Journal of Applied Business Research, 3.

Barth, R.S. (1990). Improving Schools From Within. San Francisco, CA:

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (pp. 43-44). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

Beare, H., Caldwell, B. and Millikan, R (1989), Creating an Excellent School: Some New Management Techniques, London, Routledge

Behar-Horenstein (eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives (Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey) pp. 70 -92.

Bernard Bass, R. R. (2006). Transformational Leadership. (2nd). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berry, J. W(1997) Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 46:5–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x https://doi.org/10.1080/026999497378467

Boas, Franz. “The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthroplogy.” Science 4 (1896): 901-08. Print. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.4.103.901

Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S.L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.) Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. (pp. 45 – 58). New York: Teachers College Press.

Cogan, M.L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

Colley, Kenna M. “Coming to Know a School Culture.” Diss. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1999.

Cunningham, W.C. & Gresso, D.W. (1993). Cultural Leadership: The Culture of Deal, T.E. (1987). The Culture of Schools. 1987 ASCD Yearbook: Alexandria, ASCD.

Dronkers, J. and Robert, P. (2006). The effectiveness of Public and Private School from a Comparative Perspective. European University Institute, Florence, Department of Political and Social Sciences, France.

Dumay X., Boonen T., & Damme J. V. (2013). Principal leadership long-term indirect effects on learning growth in source Mathematics: The Elementary School Journal, 114, (2), 225-251 Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673198 https://doi.org/10.1086/673198

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. G. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York:

Fullan, M.G. & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What’s Worth Fighting for in our School?

Fullan, M.G.& Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Geetz, C. (1973). Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Gruyter

Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision: Don’t discount the value of the modern. In J. Glanz & L.S.

Hallinger, P. (2010), Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research, Asia Pacific Centre for Leadership and Change, Hong Kong Institute of Education, Tai Po, Hong Kong

Hallinger, P. and Murphy, J. (1986), “The social context of effective schools”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 94 No. 3, pp. 328-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/443853

Hallinger, P., Bickman, L. and Davis, K. (1996), “School context, principal leadership and student achievement”, Elementary School Journal, Vol. 96 No. 5, pp. 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1086/461843

Hargreaves, A. (1997). Rethinking educational change: Going deeper and wider in the quest for success. ASCD Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. ossey-Bass.

Kroeber, A.L. & Kluckhorn, R. (1968). The nature of culture. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. New York: Teachers College Press.

Latham, J. (2014). Leadership for Quality and Innovation: Challenges, Theories and Framework for Future Research. Colorado.

May H., Huff J., & Goldring E. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: international perspectives An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 23, (4)

Moffitt, J. (2007). What Works: Principal Leadership Behaviors that Positively Impact Student Achievement in Elementary Schools.

Najjar, D. (2008). Effectiveness of Management in Private Schools in Lebanon. School of Education, The University of Birmingham.

Oracion, C. (2014). Teacher leadership in Public schools in the Philippines. Institute of Education, University of London, London

Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53-66.

Printy S. M & Marks H. M. (2003). Learning, teaching, leading: A Global Perspective. Theory Into Practice, 45 (2), 125-132 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4502_4

Rynetta Washington, C. S. (2014). How Distinct is Servant Leadership Theory? Empirical Comparisons with Competing Theories. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11.

San Antonio, D. (2014). Participatory School Administration, Leadership and Management: its impact on the Creation of better Philippine Public Secondary Schools. School of Education of the Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, Australia.

Schein, E. (1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco, CA, JosseyBass. Schools. New York: Longman.

Schultz, M. (1994). On Studying Organizational Cultures. New York: Walter de Teachers CollegePress. Sergiovanni, T.J. & Starrat, R.J. (2002). Supervision: A Redefinition. 7th Edition. Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill

Shortridge, K. (2015). principal's Leadership Styles and the Impact on Student Achievement.

Soehne D. & Ryan T. (2011). The interdependence of principal school leadership and student achievement. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, v5 n3 p274-288 Fall 2011. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ974355

The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. (2004). Principal Leadership in Improving Student Achievement. Retrieved December 8, 2017, from Reading Rockets: http://www.readingrockets.org/article/role-principal-leadership-improving-student-achievement

Zalwango, M. (2014). The Role of Motivation in Enhancing teacher's Performance in Private Primary Schools a case of St. Mary’s International School. Human Resource Management of the Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania.




How to Cite

Bahala, E. B., Onrubia, R. P., Bernal, L., Madrigal, P. M., & Adan, J. E. (2018). A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PRIVATE AND PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS’ PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP AND ITS IMPACT TO THE STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND ENGLISH SUBJECTS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 1590–1610. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.15901610