• Liudmyla Gryzun Department of Computer Science, Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine



Pre-service Teachers’ Training, Integrated Curriculum Design, Scientific Knowledge Penetration, Interdisciplinary Learning Activity


Various approaches to the curriculum and education content development are permanently in focus of didactic research and practice of specialists’ training. It is obvious that the subjects which actually make vocational curriculum, their structure and interaction, have powerful influence on the pre-service specialists’ professional expertise. According to recent studies, integrative approach to creation of interdisciplinary curriculum is taking on real significance.  The issue has special importance for pre-service teachers’ training. Their integrated knowledge and skills must enable to render the same approach to their professional activity directed on schoolchildren. Thus, the objective of the paper is to represent author’s technology of integrated curriculum design based on scientific knowledge penetration and application of AI tools, and the analysis of its influence on the outcome of pre-service teachers’ preparation. Methodology of diagnostics of trainees’ features is elaborated and applied. Special focus is made on the process of picking up interdisciplinary learning activity supported by the obtained integrated content. Future scope may include application of the proposed integrative approach to defining curriculum systems and solving various didactic problems.


Agar, J. (2012). Science in the Twentieth Century and Beyond (pp. 403-530). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Agassi, J. (2007). Science and Its History: A Reassessment of the Historiography of Science (pp.119-197). Boston: Studies in the Philosophy of Science.

Boskovic, B. (2016) European Social Model in the 21Century: Revisited and towards Social Investment. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2 (1), 1566-15791.

Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. C. (2003). Scaffolding knowledge integration through curricular depth. Journal of Learning Sciences, 12(4), pp. 451-494.

Clark, D. B., & Linn, M. C. (2012). The Knowledge Integration Perspective. Connections Across Research and Education: Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change.

Clark, D. B., D'Angelo, C., & Schleigh, S. (2011). Comparison of students' knowledge structure coherence and understanding of force in The Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 207-261.

diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 843-900.

Drake, S. M. & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Dufresne, R., Mestre, J., Thaden-Koch, T., Gerace, W., & Leonard, W. (2005). Knowledge Representation and Coordination in the Transfer Process. In: Mestre, J. ed., Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 155-215). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1), 3–71.

Gryzun, L. (2013). Projecting a curriculum subject modular structure on the basis of scientific knowledge integration. GISAP. Educational sciences, 1, 35-36.

Jung, Dae Bum (2015). Effectiveness of higher education to labor productivity. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (1), 11-22.

Jun-yin Y., & Jing-qing K. (2013). Reform and development talents educating about geology academies. Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, Proceedings of the 6th ICEBE 2013, 175-180

Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Edition 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, I. (1978). History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions published. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, H. S., Liu, O. L., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Validating measurement of knowledge integration in science using multiple-choice and explanation items. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(2), 115–136.

Linn, M. C., Eylon, B., & Davis, E. A. (2004). The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In: Linn, M., Davis, E. & Bell P. eds, Internet Environments for Science Education (pp. 29-46), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2011). Science Learning and Instruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge Integration. New York: Routledge.

Liu, O. L., Lee, H. S., Hofstetter, C., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Assessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures, and evidence. Educational Assessment, 13(1), 33–55.

Lupu, C. (2015). Elaborating a Paradigm for the Didactics of a Discipline. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 203, 35 – 41.

McDonald, J., & Czerniak, C. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary units strategies and examples. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 5-16.

Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision. Massachusett: McGrawHill.

Nichols, P., & Sugrue, B. (1999). The lack of fidelity between cognitively complex constructs and conventional test development practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(2), 18–29.

Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic Information Processing. In Minsky M. ed., A Framework for Representing Knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision (pp. 227–270). Massachusett: McGrawHill.

Renzi, M., Sangiorgio, F., & Carrada, G. (2013). Didactic of scientific disciplines in school: a possible role. LaguNet Transitional Waters Bulletin TWB, 7 (2), 13-16.

Rousseau, G., & Roy, P., (1980). The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

Singh, P. & Kumar, M. (2017). A Study On Infrastructure And Organizational Learning: Rethinking Knowledge Performance Perspective. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 61-77.

Voronina, H. (2018). Career Perspective of High School Students: Study of English Experience for Implementation in Ukraine. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 67-74.

Wagner, J. F. (2010). A Transfer-in-Pieces Consideration of the Perception of Structure in the Transfer of Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 443-479.

Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Cognitive Development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337-375.




How to Cite