THE QUALITY OF PEER RELATIONS IN A SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT: FROM INDIFFERENCE TO MUTUAL SUPPORT

Authors

  • Agnieszka Iłendo-Milewska Affiliation with Private University of Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology Bialystok, Poland
  • Joanna Nawrocka Affiliation with Private University of Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology Bialystok, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.10141034

Keywords:

School, School Environment, Peer Relation, Emotion, Conventional and Dysfunctional Behavior

Abstract

The quality of peer relationships is one of the traditional issues of social psychology. Extensive knowledge of this area enables us to deeper the understanding of different types of conflicts among peers, but does not allow their effective prevention. This research sought to investigate the students' perception of peer relation and estimate behavioral tendency related to the psychological theory. The article is based on the humanistic conception of students' support as well as the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), the BIAS Map (Fiske et al., 2002; 2007) and the Integrated Threat Theory (Stephan, 2002). To measure the aspects of the quality of peer relations, three questionnaire were used: the Semantic Differential Technique 'Typical Peer' (A. Iłendo-Milewska, 2007), the Data Sheet to evaluate the behavioral tendency and to recognize the emotion (A. Iłendo-Milewska, 2013), and the Scale of Social Support by Roman Cieślak (1995) to measure the mutual support in students' perception. The results present two main themes in the field of the quality of peer relation: (1) the students in the 1st grade experienced unpleasant emotions towards a typical peer and they perceived 'a typical peer' as less competent than students in the 3nd grade, (2) in the area of currently received support, the group of 1st grade students significantly more often declares that a typical peer did not show the understanding for the school situation. The results help understand that the intervention programs should be implemented in order to shape the deeper level of peer relation in the school environment.

References

Brown B. B., Lohr M. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.47

Bukowski W. M., Hoza B., Boivin M. (1993). Popularity, friendship, and emotional adjustment during early adolescence. W: W. Damon (Series Ed.) & B. Laursen (Vol. Ed.), New directions for child development: Vol. 60. Close friendships in adolescence. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 23–37.

Costarelli S., (2005). Social identity threat and experienced affect: The distinct roles of intergroup attributions and social identification. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10. W: T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davis M., Stephan W.G., (2006). Electromyographical analysis of responses to threat. Unpublished manuscript, New Mexico State University. W: T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J., Glick P., (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth, then competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J., Glick P., Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

Frijda N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gaś Z. B., (red.) (2004). Badanie zapotrzebowania na profilaktykę w szkole. Poradnik dla szkolnych liderów profilaktyki. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Masz Szansę.

Gaś Z. B., (2000). Psychoprofilaktyka. Procedury konstruowania programów wczesnej interwencji. Lublin: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Gryniuk I., Tuszyńska-Bogucka W., (2004) Psychorysunek tematyczny jako narzędzie diagnozy sytuacji szkolnej i rodzinnej ucznia. W: Gaś Z. B. (red.), Badanie zapotrzebowania na profilaktykę w szkole Poradnik dla szkolnych liderów profilaktyki. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Masz Szansę, 127-142.

Harwas-Napierała B., Trempała J. (red.) (2005). Psychologia rozwoju człowieka, t.2, Warszawa: PWN, s.183.

Hefnavi A., (2017). Towards an Effective teachers' professional learning. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (1), p. 453-466. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.s31.453466

Herrmann R. K., Fischerkeller M. P., (1995). Intergroup emotion and Images. W: D. Mackie, E. R. Smith (eds.). From prejudice to intergroup emotions. Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York and Hove: Psychology Press, 209.

Jessor R, (1992). Risk behavior in adolescence: a psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Developmental Review, 12, 374-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90014-S

Jessor R., Jessor S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development. A longitudinal study of youth. Academic Press New York.

Lazarus R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lindsay G. (1983). Problems of adolescence in the secondary school. London: Croom Helm.

Mackie D. M., Devos T., Smith E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602

Maner J. K., Kenrick D. T., Becker D. V., Robertson T. E., Hofer B., Neuberg S. L., Delton A. W., Butner J. M., Schaller. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.63

Mesarosova, M. (2017). Care for self-development in relation to the self-regulation in the students of helping professions. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 586-596. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.s31.586596

Niedenthal P., Krauth-Gruber S., Ric F., (2006). Psychology of emotion. Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. New York: Psychology Press.

Pettigrew T. F., (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727900500407

Poleszak W., (2004). Diagnoza relacji rówieśniczych w środowisku szkolnym. W: Z. B. Gaś (red.). Badanie zapotrzebowania na profilaktykę w szkole. Poradnik dla szkolnych liderów profilaktyki. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Masz Szansę, 155-170.

Rosenberg S., Nelson C., Vivekananthan P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086

Shamir M., Sagiv-Schifter T., (2006). Conflict, identity, and tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa intifada. Political Psychology, 27, 569-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00523.x

Stephan, W. G., Renfro L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. W: D. M. Mackie, E. R. Smith (eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions. Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York and Hove: Psychology Press, 191-208.

Turner J. S., Helms D. B. (1999). Rozwój człowieka. Warszawa, WSiP.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-11

How to Cite

Iłendo-Milewska, A., & Nawrocka, J. (2018). THE QUALITY OF PEER RELATIONS IN A SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT: FROM INDIFFERENCE TO MUTUAL SUPPORT. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 1014–1034. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.10141034