COLLABORATIVE TESTING – IMPLICATIONS ON KNOWLEDGE RETENTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.423436Keywords:
Collaborative testing, knowledge assessment, peer learning, knowledge retentionAbstract
Long-term monitoring of students’ achievements (5th to 8th grade, Branislav Nušić Primary School, Belgrade, Serbia) on Serbian Language and Computer Science tests, led authors to the conclusion that achievements, in most cases, are lower than expected. Test scores are inconsistent with the level of proficiency students are showing at school, during classes, when knowledge is not formally evaluated or is assessed in a different way. It is also noted that the knowledge that students demonstrate on tests usually does not keep. The lack of functional knowledge is confirmed by students’ weak achievements on the Primary School Final Exam.The authors have noticed that process of testing in both subjects causes discomfort in students, a decline of confidence, uncertainty and fear that they will not be successful enough. The authors have searched for a new type of testing that would have a positive impact on students’ achievements, prolong knowledge retention and provide the freedom of communication that encourage peer learning and encourage self-testing and auto-correction.The authors assumed that deficiencies of traditional testing could be overcome by introducing collaborative testing. Through action research, authors have concluded that collaborative testing contributes to the knowledge retention. Students achieve better results on tests. Testing becomes part of the learning process. The students are in a position to assess their knowledge and to act in order to advance. By developing the social aspects of education, progress of other students becomes one’s own progress, and responsibility is handed over to the learner at the fullest extent.
References
Arula, V., & Aleksić, K. (2015). The impact of collaborative testing on knowledge retention. XVIII International Scientific Conference “Educational Research and School practice” – Challenges and Dilemmas of Professional Development of Teachers and Leaders in Education: Proceedings. (pp. 286-289). Belgrade: Institute for Educational Research, Institute for the Improvement of Education.
Antić, S. (2010). Kooperativno učenje: modeli, potencijali, ograničenja. Institut za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Gardner-Medwin, T., and Curtin, N. (2007). Certainty-Based Marking (CBM) for Reflective Learning and Proper Knowledge Assessment. From the REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility, 29th-31st May, 2007. Available at http://ewds.strath.ac.uk/REAP07
Green, R. A., Cates, T., White, L. and Farchione, D. (2016), Do collaborative practical tests encourage student-centered active learning of gross anatomy?. American Association of Anatomists, 9: 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1564
Khusnia, A. N. (2015). Strategies to enhance peer feedback and self assessment in extended speaking course. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, Vol 1, No 1. https://grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/article/view/344
Pandey, C., and Kapitanoff, S. (2011). The influence of anxiety and quality of interaction on collaborative text performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol 12, Issue 3, pp. 163 – 174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411415077
Pešikan, A. (2010). Savremeni pogled na prirodu školskog učenja i nastave: socio-konstruktivističko gledište i njegove praktične implikacije. Psihološka istraživanja, XIII (2), 157-184.
Scott Bledsoe, T., and Baskin, J. (2014). Recognizing Student Fear: The Elephant in the Classroom. College Teaching, Vol. 62, Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.831022
Stepanović, I. (2010). Određivanje vršnjačke interakcije i istraživanje njene uloge u kognitivnom razvoju u kontekstu Pijažeovog i socio-kulturnog pristupa. Psihološka istraživanja, XIII (2), 219-240.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.