TEST OF HOMOGENEITY BASED ON GEOMETRIC MEAN OF VARIANCES

Authors

  • Aldwin M. Teves Central Philippines State University, Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.306316

Keywords:

Bartlett’s Test, Homogeneity, Power of the Test, Geometric Mean, Simulation, Mixed Distribution

Abstract

Prior to comparison of means, there is k-population variances   need to be tested.   The usual contention is that .  The propose methodology utilizes the Geometric Mean among sample variances to estimate the pooled variance,  that plays a vital role in the final computation in the z-statistic. When the null hypothesis is false, this statistical innovation deserves to be considered as potential methodology.The illustration of this methodology using empirical data sets  analyzed through the use of the  Bartlett’s test exhibited the same decisions when analyzed by this propose methodology.  This means that the innovation brought about by this method captures similar utility at a minimum computational procedure. For simulated data sets with homogenous variances, the propose methodology is prone to detect heterogeneity due to artificial differences brought by large proportion of variance to its mean. For simulated data sets under the mixed distribution, the propose methodology is more sensitive to detect heterogeneity of variances.  Theproposemethodology has demonstrated a significantly higher power to detect differences of variances compared to the conventional Bartlett’s test based on paired t-test.  This methodology can be considered as an alternative statistical tool when there is no certainty to assume the homogeneity of variances prior to analysis of variances in comparing group means. 

References

Brown, Morton B.; Forsythe, Alan B. (1974). "Robust tests for equality of variances". Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 364–367

David Birks and Yadolah Dodge (1993). Alternative Methods of Regression. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Hogg, R.V. and A.T. Craig (1970, 3rd Ed). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. The Collier-Mcmillan Publishers, London.

Levene, H. (1960). In Contribution to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California.

Maddala, G.S. (2001, 3rd Ed). Introduction to Econometrics. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Miller, I and M. Miller (2004). Jonh E. Freund’s Mathematical Statistics with Application. Pearson, Prentice Hall. Pearson Education, Incorporated.

Minium W. Edward. (1970 2nd Ed). Statistical Reasoning in Psychology and Education. John Wiley and Sons, Incorporated.

Padua, R.N. (2000). Elements of Research and Statistical Models. MPSC Publishing House, C.M. Avenue, Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City.

Peek, R., Olsen, C., and Deveore, J. (2008, 3rd Ed). Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis. Brooks/Cole. International Students Edition.

Ronald E. Walpole (2002 3rd Ed.). Introduction to Statistics. Pearson Education, Asia Pvt. Limited.

Simon, M.K. (2006). Probability Distributions Involving Gaussian Random Variables. A Handbook for Engineers, Scientists and Mathematicians. Springer.

Scheaffer, R.L. and Young, L.J. (2010, 3rd Ed). Introduction to Probability and Its Application. Brooks/Cole CENGAGE Learning. International Edition.

Snedecor, George.W. and William G. Cochran (1980 7th Edition). Statistical Methods 1980. The Iowa State University Press, USA.

Staudte, R.G. and Simon J. Sheather (1990). Robust Estimation and Testing. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-06

How to Cite

Teves, A. (2017). TEST OF HOMOGENEITY BASED ON GEOMETRIC MEAN OF VARIANCES. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.306316