ESSENCE OF AND A MODEL FOR REFLECTIVE PRACTICE IN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNIATION

Authors

  • Prajna Pani School of Management, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.622642

Keywords:

Development, Communication, Learning, Integrated, Community

Abstract

A transformative approach to Integrated Development Communication framework is driving the development of and innovation in student learning with promises to significantly impact local communities. A case study concerning a themed – MBA Programme (Development Management) of a Multi-faculty State Private University in India is used to illustrate how self-learning, actionlearning and technology-enabled learning can be dynamically combined for sustainable community development. Content and topic are effectively negotiated with communities, facilitating the creation of a supportive learning and development ambience, and providing opportunities to apply new skills. The three philosophies of learning influence the program design and practice. Integrated Development Communication is introduced as an integrative construct that facilitates critical thinking, community interaction, problem solving and crossdomain learning. Learning is driven by the need to solve a problem. The paper aims to present the vision and evidences of responsible involvement in real problems to promote positive attitudes and behaviours. The paper also reflects on the essence and impact of theory of learning on integrated development communication model where Learning = Programmed Knowledge of the Past + Questioning Insight + Implementation.

References

AACU (2002). Greater Expectations: A New Vision for Learning as a Nation Goes to College: National Panel Report, American Association of Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC, pp. 62.

Bateson, Gregory (1972). ''The Logical Categories of Learning and Communication'', in Steps to An Ecology of Mind, New York: Ballantine Books, pp 279-308.

Buttar, Sandeep S. (2015). ICT in Higher Education, People: International Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.2, Issue 2, pp, 1692.

Delors, Jacques (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Dewey John (1916). Democracy and Education; An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, New York: Macmillan. http://wearesocial.com

Digital, Social & Mobile in India (2015) <http://wearesocial.com>

Fraser, C. and J. Villet (1994). Communication - A key to human development. Rome: FAO.

Fink, L.D., (2003). Creating Significant learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 295 p.

Jacobson, T., & Sarvaes, J. (1999). Introduction. In T. Jacobson & J. Sarvaes (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to participatory communication (pp. 1-13). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press MBA in Development Management (DM). Retrieved from http ://< www.cutm.ac.in>

www.cutm.ac.in

Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2001). Communication for development in the Third World: Theory and practice for empowerment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132113751

Pani, Prajna (2010), Emotional Intelligence: Learning to Learn, Journal of English Language Teaching India, ELT@I, ISSN 0973-5208, vol.48.

Revans, R. W. (1982). The Origin and Growth of Action Learning. London: Chartwell Bratt.

Revans, R. W. (1989). The Golden Jubilee of Action Learning. Manchester: Manchester Action Learning Exchange, University of Manchester.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Salleh, Narhidayah et al. (2015). Maximizing Students‟ Learning Experience through Differentiated Instructions in an ICT-Integrated Environment, PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, ISSN 2454-5899, Special Issue vol. 2, pp. 1403.

Savin-Baden M., and Major C.H., (2004). Foundations of Problem-Based Learning. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Berkshire, England, p.197.

Schank, R. (1982). Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Schank, Roger C. (1995). What We Learn When We Learn by Doing. (Technical Report No. 60). Northwestern University, Institute for Learning Sciences.

Sustainable Development in Action (2015). Special Report on Voluntary Multi-stakeholder Partnerships and commitments for Sustainable Development, prepared by Division for Sustainable Development, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. sustainabledevelopment.un.org

United Nations Children‟s Fund (1994). The Women's Equality and Empowerment Framework. Available on-line at www.unicef.org/programme/gpp/policy/empower.html.

www.unicef.org/programme/gpp/policy/empower.html.

Vlasceanu, L., Grünberg, L. and Pârlea, D. (2007). Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions, Bucharest, UNESCO-CEPES.

Washington: World Bank Weinstein, K. (1995). Action Learning: A Journey in Discovery and Development. London: Harper Collins.

World Bank. (2002). Community Driven Development: Challenges and Opportunities for Kenya. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

Zhao Nan Z, Four Pillars of Learning, International Bureau of Education (UNESCO), www.ibe.unesco.org/cops/Competencies/PillarsLearningZhou.pdf

ww.ibe.unesco.org/cops/Competencies/PillarsLearningZhou.pdf

Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2011). Action leadership: Towards a participatory paradigm. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3935-4

Downloads

Published

2016-12-14

How to Cite

Pani, P. (2016). ESSENCE OF AND A MODEL FOR REFLECTIVE PRACTICE IN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNIATION. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.622642