LEARNING TO LISTEN METACOGNITIVELY

Authors

  • Siham Bouzar Lecturer Assistant, University of Algiers2, Algeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.495507

Keywords:

Listening skill, Learning Strategies, Meta cognitive strategies, Listening instruction

Abstract

Learning any language requires the development of receptive skills and productive ones. In other terms, listening, reading, speaking and writing are the major four building blocks. This piece of work focuses mainly on the listening skill as being a highly complicated activity demanding lot of efforts from the learner to construct meaning. Therefore, it is with the perspective to teach EFL/ESL learners how to listen instead of making them listen to learn that this work is achieved. 

References

Bacon, S. M (1991). Authentic Listening in Spanish: How Learners Adjust Their Strategies to the Difficulty of the Input.Hispania. Volume 75, Number 2. pp 398-412

Bozorgian, H and Alamdari, F (2013). Metacognitive Instruction: Global and Local Shifts in Considering Listening Input. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Education Research International, Volume 2013, Article ID 457250, pp 1-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/457250

Celce-Murcia, M and Olshtain, E (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

Chamot, A.U. and Kupper, L. (1989). Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Instruction. Foreign Language Annals 22(1), 13-24.

Coşkun, A (2010). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. Novitas- ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4 (1), pp 35-50.

Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Field, J. (2008). Bricks or mortar: Which Parts of the Input does a Second Language Listener Rely On? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 411-432.

Flavell, J.H (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive Development Inquiry. American Psychologist (34), pp 906-11.

Flowerdew, J and L. Miller (2005). Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice. Richards,J. C Editions. Cambridge Language Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Goh, C (1997). Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Listeners.ELT Journals 51/4. Oxford University Press. pp 361-69.

Goh, C (2002 b). Teaching Listening in the Language Classroom.Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Goh, Cand Taib, Y (2006). Metacognitive Instruction in Listening for Young Learners. ELT Journal. Volume 60/3. Oxford University Press. pp 222-232.

Goh. C. C.M and Hu. G (2013). Exploring the Relationship Between Metacognitive Awareness and Listening Performance with Questionnaire Data. Language Awareness, 23:3, Routledge Taylor & Francis, pp 255-274.

Graham, S and Macaro, E (2008). Strategy Instruction in Listening for Lower-Intermediate Learners of French. Language Learning: A Journal of Language Research in Language Studies. Vol 58(4). pp 747-783.

Hedge, T (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press.

Krashen, S (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. First Edition, Pergamon Press Inc.

Krashen, S (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman Group UK Ltd.

Kurita, T. (2012). Issues in Second Language Listening Comprehension and the Pedagogical Implications. Accents Asia, 5(1), pp. 30-44.

McDonough, S (1995). Strategy and Skill in Learning a Foreign Language. London: Edward Arnold.

McMurray, A. J, Pace, R. W and Scott, D (2004). Research: A Commonsense Approach. Tomson Social Science Press.

Morley, J. (2001). Aural Comprehension Instruction: Principles and Practices. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.3rd Ed Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. pp.69-85

O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, (10)4: pp 418-437.

O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. USA.

Osada, N (2004).Listening Comprehension Research: A Brief Review of the Last Thirty Years. 2004 TALK, Japan.

Oxford, R. L (1990). Language Learning Strategies, USA. Oxford

Oxford, R. L (1993). Research Update on Teaching L2 Listening. System. 21(2): pp 205-211.

Oxford, R. L (1994). Language Learning Strategies: an Updated. ERIC Clearing house on Language and Linguistics, Online.

Oxford, R. L (2001). Language Learning Strategies. In Carter, R and Nunan, D., editors, The Cambridge Guide to Speakers of Other Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 166-172.

Oxford, R., & Leaver, B. (1996). A Synthesis of Strategy Instruction for Language Learners. In Oxford, R. (Eds) Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Crosscultural Perspectives(Technical Report)/13. Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre, University of Hawaii', Honolulu HI. pp 227-146.

Thompson, I and J, Rubin (1996). Can Strategy Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension? In Foreign Language Annals 29/3: pp 331-342.

Vandergrift, L (1997). The Cinderella of Communication Strategies: Reception Strategies in Interactive Listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81: pp 495-505.

Vandergrift, L (2003). Orchestrating Strategy Use: Toward a Model of the Skilled Second Language Listener. Language Learning 53/3, pp 463-496,

Vandergrift, L and Goh C.C.M (2012). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action.New York. Routledge.

Vandergrift, L and Tafaghodtary, H.M (2010). Teaching L2 Learners how to Listen does Make a Difference: An Empirical Study. Language Learning 60 (2), pp 470-497.

Zeng, Y (2014). Investigating The Effects of Metacognitive Instruction on Chinese EFL Learners' Listening Performance. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching. Volume 3, Number 2, Nova Science Publishers, Inc. pp 139- 157

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Bouzar, S. (2016). LEARNING TO LISTEN METACOGNITIVELY. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.495507