SCHRÖDINGER'S PLOT, REVISITED: QUANTUM INDETERMINACY AND NON-DETERMINISTIC NARRATIVE IN CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE FICTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/icssh.2025.574588Keywords:
Quantum Theory, Narrative Structure, Indeterminacy, Science Fiction, Postmodernism, Quantum PoeticsAbstract
The enduring interplay between scientific paradigms and literary expression continues to shape our understanding of reality and narrative. While classical literary analysis often presupposes deterministic plot trajectories and clear causal chains, the revolutionary insights of quantum mechanics have introduced fundamental indeterminacy into our understanding of the universe. This paper argues that the conceptual framework of quantum indeterminacy, as initially explored in Modernist "quantum poetics" by figures like Daniel Albright, has profoundly influenced the non-deterministic plot progression and ambiguous narrative closure characteristic of contemporary science fiction, particularly in narratives featuring highly autonomous artificial intelligence. Drawing on the philosophical implications of quantum theory, as articulated by thinkers like Carlo Rovelli and Slavoj Žižek, this study has analyzed how select works of contemporary science fiction particularly the trending Murderbot Diaries construct plots that resist singular, predictable outcomes, mirroring the inherent probabilistic nature of quantum reality. By examining the manifestation of quantum indeterminacy in narrative structure, this paper seeks to illuminate the sophisticated engagement of modern science fiction with cutting-edge scientific and philosophical thought, contributing to the interdisciplinary dialogue between literature and science.
References
Albright, D. (1999). Quantum poetics: Yeats, Pound, Eliot, and the science of Modernism. Cambridge University Press.
Atiyah, A. S. (2019). Cosmic Harmony through Quantum Physics and Literature: An Interdisciplinary Study. International Journal of Language, Literature, Culture,
and Education, 2, 23-37.
Mahon, P. (2017). Posthumanism: A guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury.
Metzinger, T. (2010). The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. Basic Civitas Books.
Miller, D. (2013). The physics of the marginal: Quantum theory and literary interpretation. The Journal of Literary Theory, 5(1), 45–68.
Orzel, C. (2009). How to teach quantum physics to your dog. Scribner.
Prabhat, R., & Kumar, P. (2024). An interdisciplinary interpretation of literature through the lens of quantum theory. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 9(5), 63–72.
https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.95.9
Penrose, R. (1989). Quantum Magic and Quantum Mystery. In The Emperor's New Mind:
Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics (pp. 200-240). Oxford
University Press.
Rovelli, C. (2021). Helgoland: Making sense of the quantum revolution (E. Segre & S. Carnell,
Trans.). Riverhead Books.
Wells, M. (2017). All systems red. Tor.com.
Wells, M. (2018). Artificial condition. Tor.com.
Wells, M. (2020). Network effect. Tor.com.
Wells, M. (2023). System collapse. Tor.com.
Žižek, S. (2012). The Ontology of Quantum Physics. In Less than nothing: Hegel and the
shadow of dialectical materialism (pp. 700-750). Verso.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
