AN ANALYSIS OF RELIGION BIAS IN ENGLISH COURSEBOOK OF HIGHSCHOOL STUDENT ISSUED BY INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT

Authors

  • Muhammad Iqwan Sanjani English Education Department, Faculty Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.12081222

Keywords:

English Coursebook, Religion Bias, Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

The demand of English as a global language has become the most popular issue in ESL world. It results to the growing demand of English coursebook to assist student accelerating their competence. It is therefore the presence of a coursebook in teaching and learning process is fundamentally important. As well as the massive number of coursebooks, the analysis towards its contents is believed to be an urgent conduct among educators. However this analysis has rarely been practised today. Most importantly to the external factor sourrounding the process of coursebook design in which the coursebook is made such as religion, gender and culture. It is due to the fact that the process of coursebook writing is always be adjusted to the local culture or religion where the coursebook is used. Hence, this research will further assess the religion bias as appeared in student’s english coursebook. The researcher has analyzed five english coursebooks issued by the Indonesian government in which the researcher performs literature study and observation to attain the result. After collecting the data, researcher uses critical discourse analysis to further process the data. The research suggests that there is a huge tendency of bias in every coursebook that tends to expose the practice of certain religion group in Indonesia. This research will be a good reference where coursebook writers or designers could create a coursebook that is free from any bias. Further, it could maintain fairness in education without any bias to certain community or group only. 

References

Apple, M.W. (1992). The text and cultural politics, Educational Researcher, 21, pp. 4-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X021007004

Bse.kemdikbud.go.id. (2015). Buku Sequoyah Electronic. Retrieved 19 November 2015, from http://bse.kemdikbud.go.id

Budairi, A. (2012). Traces of linguistic Imperialism enacted through the discursive strategies in ELT textbooks in Indonesia. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 3-19.

Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 76-154.http: //dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499

Dody, A. (2008). Developing English Competencies (p. 7-113,). Jakarta: Ministry of Education.

Eriyanto,. (2001). Analisiswacana. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta. 222-276

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman. 195-250

Huckin, T.N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.) Functional approaches to writtenexts: classroom applications. (pp.78-92). Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency.

Hutchinson, T. and Torres, E. (1994) the textbook as agent of change, ELT Journal 48.4:315-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.4.315

Levy, G., & Razin, R. Religious Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.d oi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1621533. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1621533

Priana, J. (2008). Inter language (pp. 7-113). Jakarta: Ministry of Education.

Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELTJ, 42(4), pp. 237-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237

Sudaryanto, (1993). Metodedanane katakana kanalis is bashes. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press. 90-175

Van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell

Van Dijk, T. (1994). Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 5(4), 435-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004001.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005004001

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

How to Cite

Sanjani, M. I. (2015). AN ANALYSIS OF RELIGION BIAS IN ENGLISH COURSEBOOK OF HIGHSCHOOL STUDENT ISSUED BY INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 1208–1222. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.12081222