U.S. PERCEPTION AND POLICY ON SOUTH CHINA SEA PRE-COLD WAR

Received: 17th April 2024 Revised: 14th May 2024, 28th May 2024 & 30th May 2024 Accepted: 13th May 2024

Authors

  • Liu Jinbo School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2024.102.7689

Keywords:

South China Sea, Cognition, Dominant Position, Identity

Abstract

After World War II, the United States' South China Sea policy was formed based on its perception of the three before the Cold War. Through events such as France's occupation of nine small islands, Japan's occupation, and the struggle against Japan during the Pacific War, America has continuously deepened its cognition on the South China Sea and increasingly concerned its important value. With Japan's successive retreats in the later stages of World War II, America gradually gained control of the Sea and took a dominant position in the regional dispute. With the continuous deepening of the United States' appreciation and the changing of its identity, status, and the interests in this region, its policy has gradually taken shape

References

Cordell, H. (1948).The Memoirs of Cordell Hull.London:Hodder & Stoughton Press. https://archive.org/details/memoirsofcordell0001hull.

Chemillier-Gendreau, M. (2021). Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands. BRILL. ISBN: 9789041113818.

Hayton, B. (2014). The South China Sea: the struggle for power in Asia. Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300186833.

Kathleen Barnes, Spratly Seizure Revives Conflicting Claims, Far Eastern Survey, Vol.8, No.9, April 26, 1939.

Nguyen, T. L. A. (2015). Origins of the South China Sea Dispute. In Territorial disputes in the South China Sea: navigating rough waters. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137463685_2.

Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1935, The Far East, Volume III, p.265. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1935v03.

Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), Japan, 1931~1941, Volume II, pp.278-279. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1931-41v02.

Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1943, The British Commonwealth, Eastern Europe, the Far East, Volume III, p.1044. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943v03.

Probes Island Claims, The Evening Star, August 30, 1933. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045462/1933-08-30/ed-1/seq-17/

Shen, J. (2002). China's sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands: A historical perspective. Chinese J. Int'l L., 1, 94.

Tønnesson, S. (2002). Why are the disputes in the South China Sea so Intractable? A historical approach. Asian Journal of Social Science, 30(3). https://brill.com/view/journals/ajss/30/3/article-p570_6.xml?ebody=previewpdf-117261

Downloads

Published

2024-06-18

How to Cite

Liu Jinbo. (2024). U.S. PERCEPTION AND POLICY ON SOUTH CHINA SEA PRE-COLD WAR: Received: 17th April 2024 Revised: 14th May 2024, 28th May 2024 & 30th May 2024 Accepted: 13th May 2024. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2024.102.7689