A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY CHILDHOOD CURRICULA IN HONG KONG AND SINGAPORE – FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

Authors

  • Kam Ling LAO Open University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.11321142

Keywords:

Early Childhood Education, Mathematics Education, Curriculum Comparison

Abstract

Primary and secondary students from Hong Kong and Singapore outperformed students of many countries in mathematics in international studies. Whereas early childhood education is the foundation of elementary education, this paper aims to compare the early childhood curriculum documents of the two cities from the perspective of mathematics education and investigate the similarities and differences, if any, in their curricular intention of mathematics learning and teaching. The curricula are compared from three aspects: (1) the organization of curriculum framework; (2) the orientation of the mathematics-related content; and (3) the focuses of the mathematics-related content. It is found that both cities consider mathematics as an important and distinct learning domain in early childhood education. The analysis result shows that the two cities organize mathematics domain differently in terms of the levels of specification and the areas of emphases. The two curricula have their own characteristics as the two cities differ in cultural context and curriculum is context-specific. In light of the identified differences and similarities, the paper suggests Hong Kong to formulate learning outcomes with closer academic links and explicit expectation with respect to children’s cognitive development in mathematics. It is also suggested Singapore to elaborate the teach Principles and the PRAISE Dispositions with mathematics-related examples. 

References

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives; the classification of educational goals (1st ed.). New York,: Longmans, Green.

Campbell, E. (2006). Curricular and professional authority in schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 111-118. doi: DOI 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00349.xhttp://dx.doi.org /10.11 11/j.1467-873X.2006.00349.x

Chief Executive, H. K. (2013). 2013 Policy Address - Seek Change, Maintain Stability and Serve the People with Pragmatism. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government Retrieved from http://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2013/eng/index.html.

Committee on Free Kindergarten Education. (2015). Report of the Committee on Free Kindergarten Education: Children First: Right Start for All. Hong Kong.

Curriculum Development Council. (2006). Guide to the pre-primary curriculum. Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council.

Duncan, Greg J and Dowsett, Chantelle J. and Claessens, Amy and Magnuson, Katherine and Huston, Aletha C and Klebanov, Pamela and Pagani, Linda S and Feinstein, Leon and Engel, Mimi and Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne and Sexton, Holly and Duckworth, Kathryn and Japel, Crista. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428-1446. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). Starting Well: Benchmarking Early Education Across the World. London: The Economist.

Lao, K. L. (2014). A review of the Hong Kong early childhood curriculum from the perspective of mathematics education. Educational Alternatives, 12, 1083-1092.

Longstreet, W. S., & Shane, H. G. (1993). Curriculum for a new millennium. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Marsh, C. J. (2009). Key concepts for understanding curriculum (4th ed.). London ; New York: Routledge.

Ministry of Education, R. o. S., ,. (2012). Nurturing Early Learners: A Curriculum Framework for Kindergartens in Singapore. Singapore: Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/ education/preschool/files/kindergarten-curriculum-framework.pdf.

Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/442881

Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1975). Curriculum development: theory into practice. New York,: Macmillan.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012a). Encouraging Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) - Research Brief: Curriculum matters.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012b). Starting Strong III: a quality toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/startingstrongiiiaqualitytoolboxforearlychildhoodeducationandcare.htm#2

Walker, D. F. (2003). Fundamentals of curriculum : passion and professionalism (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

How to Cite

LAO, K. L. (2015). A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY CHILDHOOD CURRICULA IN HONG KONG AND SINGAPORE – FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 1132–1142. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.11321142