CENTRAL STATE VS REGIONAL AUTONOMY - POLITICAL ELITE’S ACTION STRATEGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/icssh.2024.0521Keywords:
Ethnic Conflict, Autonomy, Political Elite, Historical Memory, Action Strategies, Civic and Ethnic Nationalism.Abstract
The role of the autonomous institutions is significant in the elaboration of the specific strategies conducive for the political elite of either regional autonomy or central state to achieve their territorial, political and economic goals. Functional autonomous institutions enable the political elite to mobilize its ethnic group and radicalize demands. Rational assessment of the geographic location, instrumentalization of primordial markers (focus on historical memory) and constructivist ascriptions along with structural situation in and out of both, the autonomy and central state defines contemplated ethnic politics with far-going consequences of the both, central state and autonomy. Autonomy’s political elite activates primordial ascriptions, as well as, constructionist attitudes, considers geographic location to mobilize ethnic followers, press claims for secession and influence central authority to upgrade autonomous status through negotiations or violent confrontation. The Central state political elite’s decision about action strategy selection depends on the structure of situation inside and outside of the country. While operationalizing selected strategy central administration applies primordial and constructivist approaches to impact local authority’s decision- making process. Two autonomous republics of the Russian Federation, Tatarstan and Chechnya, are explored in the first decade after collapse of the Soviet Union to test theoretically identified factors impacting formation of ethnic politics and action strategies in the central state and autonomy. The methods’ triangulation (process-tracing method, discourse analysis of the official document and public speeches and semi-structured interviewing) was utilized to validate the research findings. On its way to upgrade autonomous status, Tatarstan built civic nationalism guaranteeing peaceful coexistence of the ethnic groups. Chechnya’s oppressive historic experience intensified rigid ethnic politics leading to protracted ethnic confrontation.
References
Alekberov E.1995.”The Hidden Meaning behind the Chechen War”. John Hopkins University Press. pp. 153-176.
Baev P.K. 2004. Putin’s War in Chechnya: Who steers the course? PONARS Policy Memo 345. http://csiswebsiteprod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fspublic/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/pm_0345.pdf [Accessed at 14 January 2019]
Bahry D., 2005. The new federalism and the paradoxes of regional sovereignty in Russia. Comparative Politics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 127-146.
Barth F., 1998. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Waveland Press.
Bennigsen A. and Broxup M., 1983. The Islamic Threat to the Soviet State. Routledge Revivals.
Broxup M., 1992. The North Caucasus Barrier: the Russian Advance Towards the Muslim. New York.
Broxup M., 1996. Tatarstan and the Tatars. In Smith G., The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States. London, New York: Longman
Carment D. and James P., 1996. Two-Level Games and Third-Party Intervention: Evidence from Ethnic Conflict in the Balkans and South Asia. Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 521-554
Cederman L. and Girardin L., 2007. Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies. The American Political Science Review, Vol.101, No. 1, pp. 173-185
Cornell S., 2002.“Autonomy as a Source of Conflict – Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective”, World Politics, No.54, No.2, pp. 245-276
Cornell S., 2001. Small Nations and Great Powers. Routledge
Denzin N.K.2009. The Research Act. Routledge. Tailor & Francis Group
Dunlop J.B., 1998. Russia confronts Chechnya: Roots of a Separatist Conflict, Cambridge University Press
Dunn S. and Fraser T.G., 1996. Europe and ethnicity: the First World War and Contemporary ethnic conflict. London and New York: Routledge
Dutter L., 1990. Theoretical Perspectives on Ethnic Political Behavior in the Soviet Union. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 311-334
Evangelista M., 2002. The Chechen wars: Will Russia Go the Way of the Soviet Union? Brookings Institution Press
Fearon J., Kasara K., and Laitin D., 2007. Ethnic Minority Rule and Civil War Onset. The American Political Science Review, Vol.101, No.1, pp. 187-193
Frombgen E., 1999. A Preliminary Model of Secession, Ethnic Conflict and Violence in Tatarstan and Chechnya: The Role of the State. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 91-117.
Gammer M., 1994. Muslim Resistance to the Tsar: Shamil and the Conquest of Chechnya and Dagestan. London: Frank Cass.
Geertz C., 1963. The Integrative Revolutions: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics In the New States. In Geertz. C., Old Societies and New States. New York: Free Press.
Graney K., 2009. Of Khans and Kremlin. Lexington Book.
Gurr T. R., 1993.Why Minorities Rebel: A Global Analysis of Communal Mobilization and Conflict Since 1945. International Political Science Review, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 161-201.
Hale H. E., 2000. The Parade of Sovereignties: Testing Theories of Secession in the Soviet Setting. British Journal of Political Science, 30, pp. 31-56.
Hall R., 1979. Ethnic Autonomy: Comparative Dynamics, the Americas, Europe, and the Developing World. New York: Pergamon Press.
Hanson P., 1999. The Russian economic crisis and the future of Russian economic reform. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 1141-1166.
Hechter M., 1978. Group Formation and the Cultural Division of Labor. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 84, No. 2, 293-318.
Hill F., 1995. Russia's Tinderbox. Conflict in the North Caucasus and its Implications for the Future of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/russias_tinderbox_1995.pdf [Accessed at 10 December 2019].
Horowitz D.L., 2001.Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
Hughes J,. 2001. Managing Secession Potential in the Russian Federation. Regional & Federal Studies, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 36-68.
Khakimov R. S., 1996. Prospects of Federalism in Russia: A View from Tatarstan. Security Dialogue, Vol.27, No.1, pp. 69-80.
Lieven A., 1998. Chechnya, Tombstone of Russian Power, Yale University Press.
Matsuzato K., 2007. Muslim Leaders in Russia's Volga-Urals: Self-Perceptions and Relationship with Regional Authorities. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp.779-805.
Melson R. and Wolpe H., 1970. Modernization and the Politics of Communalism: A Theoretical Perspective. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 1112-1130.
Nigel J., 1994. Constructing ethnicity: Creating and recreating ethnic identity and culture. Social problems, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 152-176.
Nikolaev Y. V., 1996. The Chechen Tragedy: Who is to Blame? Nova Science Publishers Inc.
Posen B. R., 1993. The security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict. Survival, Vol.35, No.1, pp.27-47.
Rabushka A. and Shepsle K.A., 1971. Political Entrepreneurship and Patterns of Democratic Instability in Plural Societies. Race, XII, 4.
Reddaway P., 1994. Instability and Fragmentation. Journal of Democracy, Vol.5, No.2, pp.13-19.
Roeder P.G. 1995. Liberalization and Ethnic Entrepreneurs in the Soviet successor States. Available at: http://pscourses.ucsd.edu/ps200b/Roeder%20Liberalization%20&%20Ethnic%20Entrepreneurs.pdf [Accessed at 20 March 2018].
Rothchild D. and Hartzell A.,1999. Security in Deeply Divided Societies: The Role of Territorial Autonomy. Nationalism and ethnic politics, Vol. 5:3, No. 4, pp. 254-271.
Rothschild J., 1981 Ethnic Peripheries Versus Ethnic Cores: Jewish Political Strategies in Interwar Poland. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 95, No.4, pp. 591-606.
Russell J., 2005. Lectures in Peace Studies: Terrorists, Bandits, Spooks and Thieves: Russian Demonisation of the Chechens Before and since 9/11. Third World Quarterly, Vol.21, No.6, pp. 101-116.
Sharafutdinova G., 2000. Chechnya Versus Tatarstan: Understanding Ethnopolitics in Post-Communist Russia. Problems of Post-Communism, Vol.47, No.2, pp. 13-22.
Sharafutdinova G., 2013. Getting the "Dough" and Saving the Machine: Lessons from Tatarstan. Demokratizatsiya, Available at: https://demokratizatsiya.pub/archives/21_4_166T357W4L31M860.pdf [Accessed 30 June 2021].
Shils E., 1957. Primordial, Personal, Sacred, and Civil Ties. British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 8, No.2, pp. 130-145.
Smith A.D., 1991. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Basil Blackwell.
Soldatova G.U., 1993. The Former Checheno-Ingushetia: Interethnic Relations and Ethnic Conflicts.
Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, Vol. 31, No.4, pp. 63-84.
Spicer A. D., 1981.The Ethnic Revival. England: Cambridge.
Tilly C., 1998. Durable inequality. University of California Press.
Toft M., 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence. Princeton University Press.
Treisman D. S., 1997. Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: the Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order. World Politics, Vol.49, No.2, pp. 212-24.9
Weidemann D., 1991. Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Political Development: South Asian Perspectives, South Asia Books.
Williams C., 2011. Tatar nation building since 1991: Ethnic Mobilisation in Historical Perspective. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 94–123
Available at https://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2011/Williams.pdf [Accessed at 22 February 2020].
Zurcher C., 2007. Post-Soviet Wars: Rebellion, Ethnic Conflict, and Nationhood in Caucasus. NYU Press.
Zverev A., 2002. The Patience of a Nation is Measured in Centuries’. National Revival in Tatarstan and Historiography. Available at https://www.vub.be/sites/vub/files/nieuws/users/bcoppiet/48secession-04.pdf [Accessed at 18 July 2020].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nino Pavlenishvili
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
