PROTECTION OF FASHION DESIGN: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CODE (CODE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE) AND UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 35 – PATENTS ACT

Authors

  • Pornpirun Tanyasri Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Vongchavalitkul University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2021.72.0112

Keywords:

Design, Fashion, Intellectual Property, Protection

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study legal protection for fashion design in Thailand and a comparative Case Study between Intellectual Property Code (Code de la propriété intellectuelle) and the United States Code Title 35 – Patents Act. It is to say that fashion design is considered an industrial design that has been protected as a product design under the patent law and at the same time, it is considered as the work of applied art in accordance with Thai copyright law. The copyright law did not stipulate the explicit fashion design section but it only stipulated the listed protected work as the type of artistic works. Based on my study of fashion design protection in foreign countries, especially France, the law clearly states the protection for fashion design and listed protected works stipulating the type of protected works, and includes clear rules for what action constitutes the infringement. As a result of this strong protection of the law, innovation was created and progression for the fashion design industry was supported. In the United States of America, several ways of fashion design are protectable. Under the patent law, designers can apply for a design that qualifies as a new, unique and ornamental design and shall be eligible for protection under copyright law.

References

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Sept. 9, 1886, as revised in Paris on July 24, 1971 and amended in 1979.

Dumme, M.G. (1995). Design and utility model throughout the world. Board Callaghan

Edward L, Mark M, David L. S. (2017). The Law of Design: Design Patents, Trademarks, & Copyright, Problems, Cases, and Materials. West Academic publishing, the United States of America.

Emel, A.K.A.N. (2016). Thailand: Fashion Gateway of Asia. The EPOCH TIMES. https://www.theepochtimes.com/thailand-fashion-gateway-of-asia_2005309.html

Hemmaratchatra, C. (2017). The characteristic of intellectual property. (12 ed.).2Winyuchon Publication House, Bangkok.

Kittitachasuk, Kitt. (2015). A Comparative Study with Council Regulation (EC) 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community Designs. (LL.M dissertation), Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Lertthamtewee, P. (2016). The knowledge of Thai Intellectual Property Law. Winyuchon. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, as last revised at the Stockholm Revision Conference, Mar. 20, 1883.

Marett, P. (1996). Concise course texts: Intellectual property law. Sweet & Maxwell publishing, United Kingdom.

Mastudillo (2010). Fashion Law Wiki. Copyright Protection of Design in the US v Europe. http://fashionlawwiki.pbworks.com/w/page/11611162/Copyright%20Protection%20o

Meelap, N. (1991). Copyright, Patent and Trademark. Ramkhamhaeng University Press, Bangkok.

Narumon, S. (2017). Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues.Risk of Intellectual Property Among Fashion Designs. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/risk-of-intellectual-property-among-fashion-designs-6816.html

Poungrat, Y. (1999). Thai Patent Law. (2 ed.). Winyuchon Publication House, Bangkok.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-15

How to Cite

Tanyasri, P. (2021). PROTECTION OF FASHION DESIGN: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CODE (CODE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE) AND UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 35 – PATENTS ACT. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2021.72.0112