BEHIND AID RELATIONS: HOW DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS INFLUENCE PERCEPTIONS OF WOMEN BENEFICIARIES ON EMPOWERMENT (A CASE STUDY OF RCL PROJECT OF OXFAM IN SOUTH SULAWESI PROVINCE, INDONESIA)

Authors

  • Adinda Tenriangke Development Studies Postgraduate Programme, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.437451

Keywords:

Women, Empowerment, Perception, Development, Aid Relations, Interventions, Power, Gender, Projects

Abstract

Foreign aid has the nature of ‘elegant power’, which enables donors’ intervention. This paper argues that this nature and development interventions have influenced perceptions of women beneficiaries on empowerment. Efforts to empower women have been conducted with various approaches. However, not much has been said about how development projects influence women beneficiaries’ perceptions on empowerment, including limited awareness on empowerment due to the approach of development project and dependence on external intervention. The paper looks at a case study on Restoring Coastal Livelihoods (RCL) Project of Oxfam (2010-2015) in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The research applied qualitative research techniques using semi-structured interviews and document reviews in the project area, and participant observation in Pangkajene Kepulauan District, one of the four districts covered under the project. The institutional ethnographic analysis in this research reveals that women beneficiaries perceive empowerment mostly based on their experiences in the project. However, the degree of empowerment is relative to types of women’s engagement in public spheres, men and women understanding of gender relations and equality, and nature of activities. The paper further argues that efforts to empower women tend to rely on external intervention to facilitate the process and to deal with existing dynamics of power relations. Finally, the paper underlines that empowerment depends highly on women’s personal knowledge, critical awareness, choice, willingness, and commitment. This research is crucial to contribute to gender and development studies as it highlights the multidimensional and multilayered aspect of aid relations and women’s empowerment.

References

Bedford, Kate, & Shirin M. Rai (2010) “Feminists Theorize International Political Economy.” Signs 36 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1086/651184.

Brinkmann, Svend. (2012) Qualitative Inquiry in Everyday Life London: SAGE.

Burnell, Peter. (2008) “Foreign Aid in a Changing World” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Desai Vandana and Robert B. Potter, Second, 503–7 London: Hodder Education

Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall (2013) “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs 38 (4): 785–810. doi:10.1086/669608.

Connel, Dan. (1999). “Participatory Development: An Approach Sensitive to Class and Gender.” In Development with Women, edited by Deborah Eade, 77–93 Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB

Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari, eds. (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?. London ; New York: Zed Books.

Crang, Mike, and Ian Cook (2007) Doing Ethnographies. London: SAGE. http://helicon.vuw.ac.nz/login?url=http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/doing-ethnographies/SAGE.xml.

Esteva, Gustavo, and Madhu Suri Prakash (1998) “Beyond Development, What” Development in Practice 8 (3): 280–96. Doi: 10.1080/09614529853585.

Friedmann, John. (1992). Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

Grabe, Shelly. (2012). “An Empirical Examination of Women’s Empowerment and Transformative Change in the Context of International Development” American Journal of Community Psychology 49 (1-2): 233–45. Doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9453-y.

Graham, Elspeth. (2005) “Philosophies Underlying Human Geography Research” In Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project, edited by Robin Flowerdew and David Martin, 2nd ed., 6–30. Harlow, England ; New York: Prentice Hall.

Grbich, Carol. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.

Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln (1994) “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, 105–17 California: SAGE

Kabeer, Naila. (1999). “Resources, Agency, and Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment.” Development and Change 30 (3): 435–64. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00125.

Kitzinger, Celia. (2004). “Feminist Approaches.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium, and David Silverman, 125–40 London: Thousand Oaks

Koggel, Christine M. (2008). “Theory to Practice and Practice to Theory Lessons from Local NGO Empowerment Projects in Indonesia” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (S1): 111–30. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00158.x.

Luttrell, Cecilia, Sitna Quiroz, Claire Scrutton, and Kate Bird (2009) “Working Paper 308: Understanding and Operational sing Empowerment.” Overseas Development Institute

Michelson, Britha. (1995). Methods for Development Work and Research: A Guide for Practitioners. New Delhi ; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Murray, Warwick E., and John Overton (2014) “Designing Development Research” In Development Fieldwork: A Practical Guide, edited by Regina Stevens, 19–38. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Neuman, William Lawrence. (2012). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.

Nussbaum, Martha Craven. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ottaway, Marina (2003) Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism. Washington, D.C: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Ottaway, Marina, and Thomas Carothers, ends (2000) Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion. Washington, D.C: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Parpart, Jane L. (2008). “Rethinking Gender and Empowerment” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Desai Vandana and Robert B. Potter, Second, 355–58. London: Hodder Education.

Rai, Shirin M. (2008). The Gender Politics of Development: Essays in Hope and Despair. New Delhi : London ; New York : New York: Zubaan ; Zed Books, Ltd. ; Distributed in the USA exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan.

Rowand-Campbell, Dorienne (1999). “Development with Women” In Development with Women, edited by Deborah Eade, 11–33 Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB.

Rowlands, Jo. (1999) “Empowerment Examined” In Development with Women, edited by Deborah Eade, 141–50. Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB.

Stern, Phyllis Noerager. (2011). Essentials of Accessible Grounded Theory Qualitative Essentials 4 Walnut Creek, Cal if: Left Coast Press.

Sulistyo, Bambang. Makassar Multikultur ("Multiculture Makassar") (2011) Makassar: Badan Arsip Perpustakaan dan Pengolahan Data Pemerintah Kota Makassar

Vogt, W. Paul, Elaine R. Vogt, Diane C. Gardner, and Lynne M. Haeffele (2014) Selecting the Right Analyses for Your Data: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. New York: Guilford Publications.

Walter, Maggie. (2010) “The Nature of Social Science Research” In Social Research Methods, edited by Maggie Walter, Second, 3–30. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

How to Cite

Tenriangke, A. (2015). BEHIND AID RELATIONS: HOW DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS INFLUENCE PERCEPTIONS OF WOMEN BENEFICIARIES ON EMPOWERMENT (A CASE STUDY OF RCL PROJECT OF OXFAM IN SOUTH SULAWESI PROVINCE, INDONESIA). PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.437451