THE INEDIBLE: VISUALS AND FOOD ANXIETY

Authors

  • Dalia Chakraborty Professor of Sociology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.62.340361

Keywords:

Inedible, Anxiety, Visual, Norm, Food Taboo, Consumption

Abstract

Anxiety about food as a principal item of consumption is universal. Who can and can not eat what and when, are, in most cases, normatively settled. Any violation of such norm generates anxiety. Though the focus of this paper is on the visuals, it is needless to point out, seeing food or drink invariably acts in conjunction with smelling and hearing. We usually refer to the enticing power of visuals of edible. But images of food/drink also generate anxiety regarding inedible, leading sometimes to dietary changes like the decrease in consumption of red meat, street food or food from restaurants. This paper explores how the visuals often set up, sometimes by design, distraction, disenchantment and caution - thereby inhibiting consumption. The visuals that generate food anxiety in regard to routinized everyday consumption as well as to the consumption experience in extraordinary times have been probed. The site chosen is the city of Kolkata. The inquiry is confined to women because they are still in charge of supervising food and hence have a definite association with the circulation of food taboos. The work is confined to the upper-middle-class or rich sections of the city women because among the poor and food-insecure people, there is not much of a choice regarding consumption. The focus is on contemporary experience, without neglecting its historical dynamics.   

References

Barnes, B. (2001). Practice as Collective Action. In T. Schatzki, K Cetina, E von Savigny (Eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 17-28 London: Routledge.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity. London: Sage

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bourke, J. (2003). Fear and Anxiety: Writing about Emotion in Modern History, History Workshop Journal, 55. 111-133 https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/55.1.111

Ehlert, J. (2019). Obesity, Biopower, and Embodiment of Caring: Foodwork and Maternal Ambivalences in Ho Chi Minh City. In J. Ehlert and N. K. Faltmann (Eds.) Food Anxiety in Globalising Vietnam. Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0743-0

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0743-0_4

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press

Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. (5th edition). Cambridge: Polity Press

Goodman, M.K and Sage, C. (2014).Food Transgressions: Making Sense of Contemporary Food Politics. London; New York: Routledge.

Jasper, J. M. (1997). The Art of Moral Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226394961.001.0001

Lamont, M and Molnar, V. ( 2002). The Study of Boundaries in Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 167-195 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Levi-Strauss, C. ( 1997).The Culinary Triangle. In C. Counihan, P. Van Esterik, (Eds.). Food and Culture. A Reader. London; New York: Routledge

Lupton, D. (1996). Food, the Body, and the Self. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Sen, Paromita. (2019, 14 April), The Humble Jackfruit: Jack of all Tastes. The Telegraph, online edition.

Shankar, (2017). Aharey Anaharey Vivekananda (Vivekananda in Eating and Starvation). Kolkata: Deys Publishing.

Tandon, Suneera. (2019 November). Indian Households Increasingly Preparing Western Dishes at Home. Survey. Livemint.

Warde, A. (2014), After Taste: Culture, Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514547828

Downloads

Published

2020-08-11

How to Cite

Chakraborty, D. (2020). THE INEDIBLE: VISUALS AND FOOD ANXIETY. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.62.340361