THE EXPLORATION OF USING E-SCAFFOLDING IN SOLVING PHYSICS PROBLEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.14661482Keywords:
Problem Solving, E-Scaffolding, Procedural Scaffolding, Strategy ScaffoldingAbstract
The ability of problem solving is one of the important ability which is had by student. In physics, problem solving use to solve physics exercise not only low level exercise but also high level exercise. E-Scaffolding is the help which is given to the student as online which is integrated in the website. This research aims to see how far the effectivity E-Scaffolding which is given can help student to solve the physics exercise. The research samples are five students of class X science 3 senior high school 2 Malang 2016/2017. The taken technique is purposive sampling. The data is gotten from the student’s exercise recording in the website then it is sent to the researcher’s email. Data is analyzed qualitatively. In thus research, E-Scaffolding which is use is procedural scaffolding and strategy scaffolding. Procedural scaffolding and strategy scaffolding use question prompts but in strategy scaffolding adds choice of answer which is chosen by student. The result of the research shows that E-Scaffolding can help to give the student’s indication in solving the physics problem. The student who is correct on procedural scaffolding and strategy scaffolding tends be able to solve physics exercise correctly and otherwise. These both scaffoldings can be the alternative to the teachers in helping students to solve the physics question in medium level and high level.
References
Adeoye, F. (2010). Effects of Problem-Solving and Cooperative Learning Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Physics. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 6(2), 235- 266.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A., Kim, N., & Lefler, M. (2014). A preliminary meta-analysis on the influence of scaffolding characteristics and study and assessment quality on cognitive outcomes in STEM education. Presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Québec City, Canada.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A., Kim, N., & Lefler, M. (2016). Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research Month 201X, Vol. XX, No. X, pp. 1–36.
Cagiltay, K. (2006). Scaffolding strategies in electronic performance support systems: types and challenges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International Vol. 43, No. 1, February 2006, pp. 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467673
Cho, Moon-Heum., Cho, Yoo-Jung. (2013). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students' academic engagement in online learning:Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. Internet and Higher Education 21 (2014) 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008
Creswell, John. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, London: SAGE Publications
Ge, X., Planas, L. G., & Er, N. (2010). A cognitive support system to scaffold students’ problem-based learning in a web-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1093
Gok, Tolga. (2010). The General Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and Metacognition in Physics Education. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(2): 110-122.
Hannafin, M. (1999). Learning in Open-Ended Environments: Tools and Technologies for the Next Millennium. Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference Paper.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open-ended learning environments: foundations, methods, and models. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: volume II: a new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hull, M. Michael., Kuo, Eric., Gupta, Ayush., Elby, Andrew. (2013). Problem-solving rubrics revisited: Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning. physical review special topics-physics education research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010105
Ibrahim, B & Rebello, N.S. (2012). Representational Task Formats and Problem Solving Strategies in Kinematics and Work. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research 8, 010126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010126
Kim, Eunsook., Pak, Sung-Jae. (2001). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. Physics Education Department, College of Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea.
Kim, N., Belland, B. R., Walker, A., (2017). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for STEM Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev. DOI 10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1
Lorenzo, Mercedes. (2005). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a problem solving heuristic. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3: 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-8359-7
Mason, Andrew., Singh, Chandralekha. (2010). Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers. American Journal of Physics. DOI 10.1119/1.3319652 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3319652
Ornek, F., Robinson, W.R., & Haugan, M.P. (2008). What Makes Physics Difficult?. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 3 (1): 30 – 34.
Pol, Van, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: a decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Santrock, J.W., 2011. Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
TAM, Anggela CF. (2017). Understanding How A Blend Of Scaffolding Instructions Facilitate Chinese Language Teaching. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. Volume 3 issue 2, pp. 1323-1336. https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.13231336.
Wang, Bo-Yen., & Yu, Pao-Ta. (2015). Practicing Text Summary With Online E-Book System. POPLE: International Social Science Journal. Special Issue, 2015, pp. 185-196.
Yu, Fu-Yun., Tsai, Hang-Chan., Wui, Hui-Lung. (2013). Effects of online procedural scaffolds and the timing of scaffolding provision on elementary Taiwanese students' question-generation in a science class. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2013, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.197
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Trisno Setiawan, Supriyono Koes H , Wartono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
