PROMOTING GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION WITH SCIENCE TEACHING AND ANALYSING THE WAY IT IS PERCEIVED BY STUDENTS AT SECONDARY LEVEL

Authors

  • Swati Kumari Research Scholar, Department of Education, Banasthali University, Banasthali, India
  • Sapna Sharma Associate Professor, Department of Education, Banasthali University, Banasthali, India
  • Jyoti Student (M.A. Political Science), Department of Political Science, Banasthali University, Banasthali, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.14831496

Keywords:

Global Citizenship Education, International discourse, Global Consciousness, Knowledge based, Value based and Citizenship based learning outcomes

Abstract

This case study in Dhanbad, India explores 25 grade 9 students’ learning outcomes on the basis of gender and background in Global Citizenship Education related topics of science and also their perceptions about the Global Citizenship Education. It is time that we should realize that education itself has little value if it is merely meant for entrance straightaway into a profession instead we have to value the fact that Education needs to be open to the process of interpretation and complex engagements that is brought by teachers and the pupil within learning relationships. To create opportunity for Global Citizenship Education schools should adopt analytical approaches in knowledge acquisition and incorporate ways of teaching which supports the development of global citizens in educational programs. The study also examines the discourse of international organisations in order to promote better understanding of Global Citizenship Education and the study indicates that international organisations have developed a powerful GCE discourse. We are living in highly interconnected and interdependent world where to determine our collective future, we need to acquire profound understanding of global developments and expand our global consciousness. Findings revealed the existence of difference in knowledge based, value based and citizenship based outcomes of rural and urban background students as well as gender based differences were also found.

References

Ashri, S. (2016, September). Science, environment and Literature: A Search for Human Solution. Paper presented at ICSSH 11th International Conference. http://www.gahssr.org/proceedings/13.pdf

Best, J.W. & Khan, J.V. (2006). Research in Education (10thed.). New Delhi: Pearson Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.

Bharathi, D.V. &Vanaja, M. (2011). Value-Oriented Education. New Delhi: Neelkamal Publications Private Limited.

Chauhan, C.P.S. (2010). Modern Indian Education: Policies, Progress and Problems. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers.

Cause, L. (2009). Fostering Inclusive and Ethical Intercultural Relations. Australia: Deakin University, Retrieved from http// www.deakin.edu.au/arts-ed/ccg/events/pdf/mpn%20008.pdf

Cause, L. (2012). International Mindedness and Social Control. Asian Social Science, Vol 5(9), pp 32-46.

Davies, L. (2008). Global Citizenship Education: Definitions and Debates. Bermingham, UK: Centre for International Education and Research.

Davy, I. (2011). Learners without Borders: A Curriculum for Global Citizenship. IB Position Paper, International Baccalaureate.

Guo, L. (2014). Preparing Teachers to Educate for 21st Century Global Citizenship: Envisioning and Enacting.Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education, Vol 4(1).

Jorgenson, S. (2012). Global Citizenship Education (GCE) in Post-Secondary Institutions: What is protected and what is hidden under the umbrella of GCE. Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education, Vol 2(1).

Kumar, R. (2005). Research Methodology- A step by step guide for beginners (2nded.).New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley India Pvt. Ltd.

Lawson, H. (2016). Primary Education for Global Learning and Sustainability. Cambridge Primary Review Trust, Research survey 5.

Nwafor, C.E. (2014). Use of Jurisprudential Approach in Teaching Basic Science.Abakaliki, International Researcher, Vol 3 (1).

Nambiar,K.K.V. (2008). Methods for Quality Education. New Delhi: Neelkamal Publications Private Limited.

National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National Curriculum Framework. New Delhi: India.

National Council for Teacher Education. (2009). National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education: Towards Preparing Professional and Humane Teacher. New Delhi: India.

Oxfam,C.H. (2006). Education for Global Citizenship. A Guide for Schools. http://www.oxfam.org.uk/education/who-we-are/global-citizenship-guides

Pawar, N.G. (2004). Development of educational system in India. Jaipur: Published by Book Enclave.

Prakash, R. (2003). Evaluation of Educational Research (1sted.). New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers.

Quigley, C. (2009). Globalization and Science Education: The implication for Indigenous Knowledge Systems. International Education Studies, Vol 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n1p76

Rao, P. (2013). Development of Education: Emerging Dimensions in 21st Century. New Delhi: Manglam Publications.

Ruhela, S.P. (2000). Education And The Good Life. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers and Distributors.

UNESCO(2014).Teachers for 21st Century Global Citizenship. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/resources/online-materials/single-view/news/teacher_for_21st_global_citizenship

Wellington,J. (2006). Teaching and Learning Secondary Science. London & New York: Routledge.

Zaidi, S.K. (1971). Education and Humanism (1sted.). Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla.

Zohabioun, et al. (2013). Global Citizenship Educationand Its Implications for Curriculum Goals at The Age of Globalization. International Education Studies, published by Canadian Centre of Science and Education Vol 6 (1).

Downloads

Published

2018-02-08

How to Cite

Kumari, S., Sharma, S., & ., J. (2018). PROMOTING GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION WITH SCIENCE TEACHING AND ANALYSING THE WAY IT IS PERCEIVED BY STUDENTS AT SECONDARY LEVEL. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.14831496