THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS REDUCES COST, MYTH OR REALITY? CASE STUDY OF THE RETAIL INDUSTRY OF MAURITIUS

Authors

  • Luvkishan Persand PhD Candidate, Universitee Des Mascareignes, Pamplemousses, Mauritius
  • Sachi Pertaub Researcher, Northern Talent Management, Goodlands, Mauritius
  • Ashvin K Seenarain Executive, NPCC learning centre, Ebene, Mauritius

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.12841298

Keywords:

3rd Party Logistics, Warehousing, Transportation, Quantitative

Abstract

This study looks at various perspectives about third party logistics and the advantages and disadvantages when outsourcing to 3pl.  It also discusses the various risks that are related to third party logistics. The main objectives were to find out on how the various benefits and drawbacks that are related to outsourcing to a third party logistics (3PL).  Another aim is to verify the impact of using 3PL in Mauritius.  One of the objectives was to find on the benefits related to 3PL.  Another aim was to find out on the drawbacks related to 3PL.  The methodology used for this study was questionnaire survey quantitative methods among 135 respondents who were from different cooperative sector but response rate was 120. This questionnaire investigates the various advantages, disadvantages and risks related to third party logistics. After this process, data collected has been analyzed using SPSS 22.0 where demographics analysis, cross tabulation and t-test analysis was performed to find the relationship between the variables. The findings demonstrate that outsourcing of 3PL is slowly becoming famous among suppliers.

References

Bassin, W. M. (2010). A Technique for Applying EOQ Models to Retail Bike Stalk Inven-tories. Writing of Weensy Acting Direction, 28(1), 48-55.

Bloomberg et al (2012). A Teensy Enterprise Is Not a Minuscule Big Activity. Philanthropist Business Recollect, 59(4), 18-27.

Burt, N., Dobler M., & Starling, E. (2013). Businessperson Pick and Sect Lot Sizing Carving: A Review. Machine & Operations Search, 34, 3516-3540.

Chopra, B and Meindl C, (2011) "Concavity Impacts Give Concatenation Markets: WMS Growing Slows; Transfer and Events Software Picks Up Motion." Frontline Solutions 3, no. 6 (2011): 10-12.

City, T. H. (2010). Ngo Depreciative: Realizing the Hope of Enterprise Systems. Boston: Harvard Performing Education Cast.

Coyle et al, M. (2013). Move Logistics. New Royalty: Fruitfulness Push.

Fuerst (2012). Logistics and Supply Restraint Management. London: Mineworker.

Goldsby et al, (2015). Reconstructing inventory management theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Direction, 26(9), 996-1012.

Hakansson and Persson (2014),. "Trends in Warehousing and Spacing." Post-industrial Upkeep & Place Surgery 65, no. 11 (November 2004): 12-18.

Krajewski and Ritzman (2012). Managing Dimension and Location in the Current Depot. New York, NY: Dweller Direction Memory, 2002.

Kukalis, S (2011). Slim commerce and supply restraint direction: is there a fit? Book of Performing Venturing, 20(3), 403-436.

Minner, (2010). Undertaking and Elflike Business-Principles, Recitation and Contract. Har-low: FT Prentice Psychologist.

Onwubolu and Dube (2106). Provide Business Management: Strategy, Provision, and Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Simchi-Levi et al (2014). Logistics. Stimulant Require River: Prentice Room.

Toomey, (2010). Product Direction Techniques. Leger of Elflike Job Management, 4(1), 27-33.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-02

How to Cite

Persand, L., Pertaub, S. ., & Seenarain, A. (2018). THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS REDUCES COST, MYTH OR REALITY? CASE STUDY OF THE RETAIL INDUSTRY OF MAURITIUS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.33.12841298