CORRUPTOR FIGHT BACK: IDENTIFYING THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION'S ENEMY IN ERADICATING CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.53.970985Keywords:
CEC, Corruptors Fight Back, Strategy Facing Corruptors Fight BackAbstract
The Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (CEC) is a state institution established with the aim of improving the effectiveness of efforts to eradicate corruption. With a clear juridical foundation and real achievement, the CEC is considered successful in meeting public expectations in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. Even so, the CEC's corruption eradication agenda experienced many obstacles from those who were against corruption eradication. The parties are always trying to weaken the CEC institution even there are also efforts to dissolve the CEC. Various attempts to weaken the CEC are called corruptor fight back. But unfortunately, the incessant corruptors fight back are not matched by the CEC's readiness in dealing with the fight back. Not yet identified the pattern of corruptor fight back is one indication of the weakness of the CEC in the face of the corruptor fight back. Therefore, there are three objectives of this study namely; First, learn the forms of the corruptor fight back. Second, read the workings of the corruptor fight back. Third, determine the ideal design and strategy to prevent and fight any corruptors fight back.
References
Akbar, M. F & Wicaksono, D. A. (2013). The reform of corruption eradication corruption in indonesia: The prismatic law in the recent context, Mimbar Hukum, 1(25), 178–190.
Anti-Corruption Policies in Asia and the Pacific. (2007). ADB/OECD Anti-corruption initiative for asia and the pacific. Mutual Legal Assistance, Extradition and Recovery of Proceeds of Corruption. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264041349-en
Black, H. C., Nolan, J. R., & Nolan-Haley, J. M. (1990). Black’s law dictionary: definitions of the terms and phrases of American and English jurisprudence, ancient and modern by Henry Campbell Black. 6th ed. St. Paul, MN: West.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2008). Social research methods. Don Mills, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1123-1123-P03-08 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401644
Cheung, A. B. (2007). Combating corruption as a political strategy to rebuild trust and legitimacy: can China learn from Hong Kong? Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management Comparative Governance Reform in Asia: Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust, 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-1317(08)17005-1
Chimezule, O. (2015). Strengthening Institutions in the Fight Against Corruption and Financial Crimes in Nigeria. SSRN Electronic Journal, 56(9), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2673021
Firdaus, D. M. (2018). Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (DPR RI) Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Asy-Syariah, 20(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v20i2.3028
Friedman, L. M. (1987). The legal system: a social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gatra, S. (2017, June 14). Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Akan Sampaikan Hasil Kajian Hak Angket KPK Halaman all. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com /read/2017/06/14/11013931/asosiasi.pengajar.hukum.tata.negara.akan.sampaikan.hasil.kajian.hak.angket.kpk?page=all
Genaux, M. (2004). Social Sciences and The Evolving Concept Of Corruption. Crime, law and social change, 42(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000041034.66031.02
Grenander, U., & Miller, M. I. (2009). Pattern theory: from representation to inference. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
H.T, Daniel, (2011, November 2). ICAC, I Corrupt All Cops (KPK, Komisi Pelindung Koruptor?). Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com/danielht/icac-i-corrupt-all-cops-kpk-komisi-pelindung-koruptor_55090d48a33311677a2e3a58
Hoffman, B. (2017). Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press. New York. https://doi.org/10.7312/hoff17476
Hope, K. R. (2017). Corruption in Nigeria. Corruption and Governance in Africa, 43(1), 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50191-8_4
Hui, W. (2014). Combating Corruption: The Hong Kong Experience. SSRN Electronic Journal, 6(239), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2677614
Hukum Online, 2018, Rekayasa Kriminalisasi Bibit-Candra Benar-benar Terkuak. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4af1190c0d87d/rekayasakriminalisasi-bibitchandra-benarbenar-terkuak
Indrayana, D. (2016). Dont kill KPK: a constitutional law review on the strengthening of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Malang, East Java: Intrans Publishing.
Indrayana, Denny, (2017). Combating Corruption in Yudhoyono’s Indonesia: An Insider’s Perspective, Jurnal Integritas, 3(1). 215-227. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.163
Iqbal, M. (2014). Kriminalisasi kebijakan pejabat publik: laporan penelitian. Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Keadilan, Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil, Mahkamah Agung RI.
Isra, I. (2016). Legislasi yang membunuh KPK. Jakarta: ICW.
Issacharoff, S. (2010), On Political Corruption, Harvard Law Review, 124(118). 10-54.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, (2018), Annual Report 2018, Jakarta: KPK
Kurniadi, D. (2008). Mega skandal korupsi di Indonesia. Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta: Pukat Korupsi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Lasswell, H. D. (2006). The structure and function of communication in society. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Monteiro, J. M. (2012). Penempatan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebagai Organ Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Ri Tahun 1945. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 42(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol42.no2.277
Muhtar, M. H. (2019), The legal political model on indonesian eradication corruption in the context of law enforcement institution harmonization, Jambura Law Review, 1(1). 68-93. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i1.1988
O, I. David. (2012). Corruption, Definitions, Theories and Concept, Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. 2(4), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.12816/0002257
Quah, J. S. (2007). Anti-Corruption agencies in four Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management Comparative Governance Reform in Asia: Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust, 8(2), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-1317(08)17006-3
Raven, B. H. (2017). The Comparative Analysis of Power and Power Preference. Social Power and Political Influence, 4(1) 172–198. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129693-7
Renggong, R. (2011). Kriminalisasi kpk suatu tinjauan hubungan antara fakta, norma, moral, dan doktrin hukum dalam pertimbangan putusan hakim. Jurnal MMH, 40(4), 76–98.
Sachs, S. (2011), Corruption, Clients, And Political Machines: A Response To Professor Issacharoff, Harvard Law Review, 124(62). 62-71.
Santoso, L., Meyriswati, D., & Alfian, I. N. (2014). Korupsi dan mentalitas: kendala kultural dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 27(4), 159. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V27I42014.159-172
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A practical Handbook, London: Sage Publishing.
Wibowo, R, (2018), Construction of Terror Against CEC Investigators, (Framing Coverage of Terror Against Novel Baswedan in Tempo Daily and Republika Daily), Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, 3(4), 34-55.
Widjojanto, B. (2016). Berkelahi melawan korupsi: tunaikan janji, wakafkan diri. Malang: Intrans Publishing.
Yuntho, E. (2016). Memperkuat & mempertahankan KPK: bunga rampai opini guru besar antikorupsi. Jakarta Selatan: ICW.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
