SCHEMA- BROADENING INSTRUCTION IN GRADE 9 MATHEMATICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.53.895905Keywords:
Schema- Broadening Instruction, Visual Schemas, Procedural Schemas, Structured Activities, Conceptual Understanding, Cognitive LoadAbstract
This pre-experimental study is aimed to present the effects of using the Schema- Broadening Instruction (SBI) to the Mathematics performance of one Grade 9 class at a barangay high school in the Philippines. The study used a modified approach of SBI that adopted the use of the following visual and procedural schemes: (a) The Frayer Model; (b) Visual representations of variation equations; and (c) Polya’s Four Steps in Problem Solving. The modified approach of SBI has also incorporated the use of structured (for concept formation) and open inquiry-based (for problem solving) activities. The approach aimed to reduce the students’ cognitive load in learning Mathematics by introducing visual and procedural schemas. Schemas can be handled with very little conscious effort once acquired and automated. Hence, can reduce students’ working memory load (Ericson, 2005). Results from the study showed that the students gained a wonderful experience of learning through the modified approach of Schema-Broadening Instruction. The students also showed capabilities of learning through structured forms of activities were guide questions and steps were provided for them in generalizing the concepts of the topic. But the Grade 9 students showed unreadiness for open inquiry-based activities and were not yet capable of constructing their own procedure in problem solving. The students preferred to be guided towards the step by step solution instead. Data gathered also showed that the approach has improved the students’ conceptual understanding that lead all the students to mastery. The students’ performance under problem solving also showed improvements but was not enough for all the students to gain mastery. Future scope for the study would be to develop validated visual and procedural schemas that can further reduce cognitive overload in learning Mathematics.
References
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum Development: Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107.
David, J., & Paulsen, R. (2017). Cognitive Load or Cognitive Engagement: Which Limits Learning in the Mathematics Classroom.
Ericson, B., Guzdial, M., & Biggers, M. (2005, February). A model for improving secondary CS education. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 332-336). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047124.1047460
Improving seventh grade students’ learning of ratio and proportion: The role of schema-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3), 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.001
Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Starosta, K., Leh, J. M., Sood, S., Caskie, G., ... & Mack, T. R. (2009).
Law, Q. P., Chung, J. W., Leung, L. C., & Wong, T. K. (2017). Perceptions of Collaborative Learning in Enhancing Undergraduate Education Students’ Engagement in Teaching and Learning English. US-China Education Review, 7(2), 89-100.
Lim, C. B. (2015). Implementing Schema-Based Instruction in the Elementary Classroom (Project).
Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical Understanding and Representation Ability of Public Junior High School in North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2816.43-56
Nam, N. D. (2016). Modelling in Vietnamese School Mathematics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(6).
Sarah R. Powell (2011). Solving Word Problem using Schemas: A Review of Literature. Retrieved September 1, 2017 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105905/ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Mokhtar, M. (2012). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 416-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.671
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.