INTERDISCIPLINARY CONTEXTUALIZATION (ICon) LESSONS IN TEACHING SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS

Authors

  • Edward B. Pescuela Bicol University, Legazpi City, Philippines
  • Jocelyn F. Goyena Bicol University, Legazpi City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.53.869880

Keywords:

Interdisciplinary, Contextualization, Approach, Lessons, Skills

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of Interdisciplinary Contextualization (ICon) lessons in teaching functions and their graphs. The study utilized mixed methods design to describe the features of interdisciplinary contextualization approach and to identify its effect to students’ academic performance. The lessons were implemented to thirty-eight Grade 11 public school students in Albay, Philippines. The features identified are thematic, use of local context, problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning and collaborative learning. The features identified came from the teachers interviewed who uses the approach and the researcher’s pertinent document analyses. The problems in the lessons used these features in synthesizing concepts that served as an axis of connection among disciplines. The results obtained from pretest and posttest scores of students revealed that there was a significant difference in favor of the implementation. Consequently, interdisciplinary contextualized lessons helped students to be real-life problem solvers, developed cultural awareness by citing relevant in-context problems and helped connect previously learned concepts from other disciplines. Educators must be aware that Mathematics is part of the students’ personal life, community and cultural heritage. Thus, interdisciplinary contextualization approach relate the teaching and learning process within specific communities and culture for meaningful learning experiences of the students. This approach that uses integrated lessons in Mathematics make the teaching and learning more accessible, relevant, and meaningful to every students that would further develop 21st century skills.

References

Chrysostomou, S. (2004). Interdisciplinary Approaches in the New Curriculum in Greece: A Focus on Music Education. Arts Education Policy Review. 105(5), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.105.5.23-30

De Diso, A. C. (2013). The National Achievement Test of the Philippines. Retrieved June 5, 2017 from www.philippinesbasiceducation.us

Demirel M. and Coskun Y. D. (2010). Case Study on Interdisciplinary Teaching Approach Supported by Project Based Learning. Educational Research Association. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2010, 2(3): 28-53.

Department of Education. DepEd Memorandum No. 160 s. 2012 – National Education testing and Research Center: Mastery Level Descriptive Equivalence. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/

Dimaano, J. R. (2017). Effects of Interdisciplinary Approach Through Localized Activities on Students' Academic Performance in Science 7. 10.13140/RG.2.2.18022.11849.

Duch, B., Groh, S. E., and Allen, D. E. (Eds.), (2001). The Power of Problem-Based Learning: A Practical “How-to” for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline. Sterling, Va.: Stylus.

Duman, B. & Aybek, B. (2003). A comparison of the approaches of process-based and interdisciplinary instruction, Mugla University, Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 11, 1-12.

Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2002). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hudson JP. (2009). Pathways between Eastern and Western education. Charlotte, NC, USA. Information Age Publishing Inc.

Marshall, J. (2005). Connecting art, learning, and creativity: A case for curriculum integration. Studies in Art Education, 46(3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2005.11650076

Mathison, S. & Freeman M. (1998). The logic of interdisciplinary studies. Retrieved September 13, 2009 from http://cela.albany.edu/reports/mathisonlogic12004.pdf

Nikitina, S. (2006). Three strategies for interdisciplinary teaching: contextualizing, conceptualizing, and problem‐centering, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38:3, 251-271, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500422632

Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies: A research framework. Retrieved from http://www.math.chalmers.se/Math/Grundutb/CTH/mve375/1112/docs/KOMkompetenser.pdf

Sağdıç, Mustafa & Demirkaya, Hilmi. (2014). Evaluation of Interdisciplinary Teaching Approach in Geography Education. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 49. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.30182

Thomas, J.W. (2000) A Review of Research on Project Based Learning. Retrieved from http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf

Torres, R. Z. (2015). Localization and Contextualization: Bringing Relevant Concepts in the Classroom. Retrieved from https://www.pressreader.com/

Zakaria, E., & Syamaun, M. (2017). The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Students Achievement And Attitudes Towards Mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2017(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.5899/2017/metr-00093

Downloads

Published

2020-02-25

How to Cite

Pescuela, E. B., & Goyena, J. F. (2020). INTERDISCIPLINARY CONTEXTUALIZATION (ICon) LESSONS IN TEACHING SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 869–880. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.53.869880