PRACTICES OF THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT IN IMMIGRATION CONTROL AT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS

Authors

  • Ridwan Arifin College of Business, Government, and Law Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia
  • Sri Kuncoro Bawono Immigration Administration Program, Politeknik Imigrasi, Depok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.53.442456

Keywords:

Quality of Government, Immigration Control, Kantianism Constructivism, Sovereignty, Border Integrity

Abstract

The quality of government by Rothstein and Teorell refers to the term of impartiality in the exercise of public authority which comprises an equal conduct to public administration, public choice, multiculturalism, and feminism. This qualitative research with multidisciplinary approach examines the quality of government in immigration control at airports in Indonesia from its perspectives, principles, and practices. The result shows it has not considered the quality of government and has not designed a framework or model of the quality of government in immigration control at airports. We propose the quality of government utilizes principles of the moral law of public authority which refers to Kantianism constructivism, formalism, positivism, and rule of law. The perspectives on the quality of government should encompass human rights, sovereignty, border integrity, international law aspects, and information systems. In practices of immigration control, the quality of government shall generate positive impacts on economy, socio-culture, politics, cooperation, and national security of a country.

References

Adi, S., Martani, D., Pamungkas, B., & Simanjuntak, R. A. (2016). Analysis of the quality of performance report of the local government on websites: Indonesian case. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1229393. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1229393

Adiputra, I. M. P., Utama, S., & Rossieta, H. (2018). Transparency of local government in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-07-2018-0019

Adsera, A., Boix, C., & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 19(2), 445-490. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewg017

Agnafors, M. (2013). Quality of government: Toward a more complex definition. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000191

Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2010). Does democracy produce quality of government? European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01906.x

Christie, T., Groarke, L., & Sweet, W. (2008). Virtue ethics as an alternative to deontological and consequential reasoning in the harm reduction debate. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.020

Cornelius, W. A., & Rosenblum, M. R. (2004). Immigration and Politics. The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies(8), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104854

Donaldson, T. (1993). Kant's Global Rationalism. In T. Nardin, D. R. Mapel, & S. Smith (Eds.), Traditions of international ethics. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Farndale, E., Hope-Hailey, V., & Kelliher, C. (2011). High commitment performance management: the roles of justice and trust. Personnel Review, 40(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111095492

Fortunato, P., & Panizza, U. (2015). Democracy, education and the quality of government. Journal of Economic Growth, 20(4), 333-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9120-5

Frank, H. M. V. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863996

Hanson, G. H. (2012). Immigration and economic growth. Cato J., 32, 25.

Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: what you get. Annual review of political science, 12, 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100608-104510

Hossain, A. (2017). National, Regional, and International Cooperation and Its Effectiveness to Enhance Border Security and Safety: Past, Present, and Future. BORDER SECURITY AND SAFETY, 215.

Jezzi, N. (2016). Rawls on Kantian Constructivism. https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v4i8.2700

Khan, H. (2017). Globalization and the Quality of Government: an Analysis of the Relationship. A Global Journal, 17(4), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0352-4

Khan, H. A. (2016). The linkage between political trust and the quality of government: An analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(9), 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1068329

Knack, S. (1999). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the United States: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2504

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222-279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222

Lee, B. D. (2018). The Moral Law as a Fact of Reason and Correctness Conditions for the Moral Law. 57(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000622

Longo, F. (2008). Quality of Governance: Impartiality Is Not Enough. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 21(2), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00392.x

Mardiasmo, D., Barnes, P. H., & Sakurai, Y. (2008). Implementation of good governance by regional governments in Indonesia: the challenges.

Matsuyama, T., & Miyazaki, T. (2017). The Effects of Immigration on Social Expenditure in Host Countries. Retrieved from

Morgenthau, H. (1940). Positivism, functionalism, and international law. American Journal of International Law, 34, 260-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/2192998

Ozdowski, S. (1985). The Law, Immigration and Human Rights: Changing the Australian Immigration Control System. International Migration Review, 19(3), 535. https://doi.org/10.2307/2545855

Park, S.-H., & Wilding, M. (2014). State political and economic capacities and the quality of government in Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2014.961024

Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025790

Raz, J. (2003). About morality and the nature of law. (Symposium: Has Law Moral Foundations?). American Journal of Jurisprudence, 48, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/48.1.1

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673-706. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of Government and the Returns of Investment: Examining the Impact of Cohesion Expenditure in European Regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933

Rokhman, A. (2011). e-Government adoption in developing countries; the case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228-236.

Rothstein, B. (2011). Quality of Government and the Welfare State. In B. Rothstein (Ed.), The Quality of Government : Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective (pp. 120-144). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729589.001.0001

Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008a). Impartiality as a Basic Norm for the Quality of Government: A Reply to Francisco Longo and Graham Wilson. Governance, 21(2), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00394.x

Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008b). What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x

Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2015). Quality of Government: Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75048-3

Sassen, S. (1996). Beyond Sovereignty: Immigration Policy Making Today. Social Justice, 23(3), 9-20.

Schuck, P. H. (2008). The morality of immigration policy.(Symposium: National Borders and Immigration). San Diego Law Review, 45(4), 805-897.

Setyaningrum, D., Wardhani, R., & Syakhroza, A. (2017). Good public governance, corruption and public service quality: Indonesia evidence. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(19), 327-338.

Shannon, B. D. (2017). Competency, ethics, and morality.(Mental Health Law). Texas Tech Law Review, 49(4), 861-880.

Siagian, F., Siregar, S. V., & Rahadian, Y. (2013). Corporate governance, reporting quality, and firm value: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 3(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/20440831311287673

Suwanda, D. (2015). Factors affecting quality of local government financial statements to get unqualified opinion (WTP) of audit board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(4), 139-157.

Treisman, D. (2002). Decentralization and the Quality of Government. unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, UCLA.

Wahid, F. (2008). Evaluating focus and quality of Indonesian e-government websites. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UII.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-20

How to Cite

Arifin, R., & Bawono, S. K. (2019). PRACTICES OF THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT IN IMMIGRATION CONTROL AT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.53.442456