THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONALITY TYPE ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING: A CRITIQUE OF THE ACCELERATIVE INTEGRATED METHOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.53.142152Keywords:
Accelerative Integrated Method, Second Language Learning and Acquisition, Emotion and Personality TypesAbstract
The Accelerative Integrated Method (AIM) is an inductive approach to second language acquisition. It was developed in Canada in 1999 by Wendy Maxwell to teach French in primary school. The AIM is currently being used to teach also English, Spanish, Mandarin and Japanese in over 10,000 primary and secondary schools in the world. The method privileges meaning-making and effective communication through a gesture approach. Maxwell claims that the AIM allows learners to reach high levels of communicative proficiency quickly, mainly through an emotional engagement with the language that they learn through dance, drama and creative writing. This paper critically evaluates the AIM; it focuses on how much it draws and impacts on the learner’s personality. It also explores the appropriateness of the AIM for secondary school students who have a higher cognitive developmental age than primary students for whom the AIM was originally designed. The discussion is informed by theories on second language acquisition, emotion and personality type. The paper concludes by making recommendations on learning and teaching methodologies that can challenge and successfully engage foreign language learners while also developing in them intercultural literacy.
References
Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Language and Cognition, 12(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477
Bournot-Trites, M. & Denizot, I. (2005). Conscience phonologique en immersion française au Canada, paper presented at the 1er Colloque International de Dediactique Cognitive, Toulouse, France.
Christian, D. (2011). Dual language education. In Hinkel, E (Ed), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 3-20). New York: Routledge.
Cohen, A.D. & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck personality scales. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Fortune, T., Tedick, D. & Walker, C. (2008). Integrated language and content teaching: Insights from the language immersion classroom. In Fortune, T. & Tedick. D. (Ed), Pathways to Multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 71-96). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-007
Fries, P. H., Cummings, M., Lockwood, D. & Spruiell, W. (2002). Relations and functions within and around language. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Kovelman, I., Baker, S. & Petitto, L.A. (2008). Age of bilingual language exposure as a new window into bilingual reading development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003386
Lowe, L. (1999). Foreign language diversification and transition to secondary. In Driscoll, P. & Frost, D. (Ed), The teaching of modern foreign languages in the primary school (pp. 5-67). London: Routledge.
Lozanov, G. (1992). Suggestology. London: Routledge.
Masgoret, A.M., & Gardner, R.C. (2003). Attitudes, Motivation, and Second Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis of Studies. In Dornyei, Z. (Ed), Attitudes, Orientations and Motivations in Language Learning: advances in theory, research, and applications (pp. 167-201). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00227
Maxwell, W. (2004). Holistic Approach to the Teaching of French as a Second Language. Retrieved 15 May, 2019, from http://www.caslt.org/pdf/The%20Accelerative%20Intergrated%20Method.pdf
Maxwell, W. (2006). Teacher's Unit Guide: Les trois petits cochons. Bowen Island, BC: AIM Language Learning.
Maxwell, W. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of the accelerative integrated method for teaching French as a second language. Retrieved 7 May, 2019, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.427.4324&rep=rep1&type=pdf
McCrae, R. & Costa, P. (1989). The Structure of Interpersonal Traits: Wiggins's Circumplex and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 586-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586
Okran, Z. (2003). Edutainment: is learning at risk? Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00325
Oxford, R.L. & Ehrman, M.E. (1995). Adults' language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23(3), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00023-D
Reiss, M.A. (1983). Helping the unsuccessful language learner. Canadian Modern Language Review, 39(2), 257–266.
Richards, J.C & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Skinner, B. F. (1976). About Behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.
UNESCO. (2019). Languages in education. Retrieved 1 June, 2019, from https://en.unesco.org/themes/gced/languages
Zelenski, J. M., Sobocko, K., & Whelan, D.C. (2014). Introversion, solitude, and subjective well-being. In Coplan, R.J & Bowker, J.C. (Ed), The Handbook of Solitude: Psychological Perspectives on Social Isolation, Social Withdrawal, and Being Alone. (pp. 184-201). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118427378.ch11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
