THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF COHESIVE DEVICES ON READING COMPREHENSION OF KOREAN LEARNERS

Authors

  • Miyeon Bae Department of Korean Language and Literature, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.53.2837

Keywords:

Korean Language Education, Cohesive Devices, Coherence, Reading Comprehension

Abstract

This study explores how different types of cohesive devices impact the reading comprehension for Korean as a second language learner. According to the findings, in the case of substitution, learners did not recognize the substitute expression well when they read the text. But they felt that it was more difficult to understand the text when multiple substitutions appeared within a text. In the case of conjunction, conjunctions helped learners understand the text. And in the case of ellipsis, learners who did not recognize the ellipsis read the text naturally, but the ones who did recognize it as an ellipsis responded that the meaning of the sentence was confusing and more difficult to comprehend. Finally, in the case of lexical device, repetition of the same word was helpful, but the repetition of synonym or hyponym did not help comprehend the text, because it required them to think about the relationship between the word and the synonym once more. It is hoped that the findings in this study will be of guidance to educators on how to teach cohesive devices so that the Korean language learners can effectively read and comprehend the meaning of Korean text.

References

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484

Ha, J. H., & Hwang, S. Y. (2019). A Study on Use of Cohesive Devices in Presentation of Advanced Korean Learners for Academic Purpose, Bilingual Research 72, 315-340. https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2018..72.315

Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. New York: Longman.

Kwak, S. J., & Kang, H. H. (2018), A Study on the Use of Cohesive Devices in Spoken Discourse of Intermediate Level KFL College Students in the U.S. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 49, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.21716/TKFL.49.1

Lee, B. L. M., & Supaporn B. (2012). A study on the cognition of coherence in Korean texts for Thai Korean Language Learners. Bilingual Research, 48, 181-205. https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2012..48.181

National Institute for International Education. (2016). The 47th Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) II reading.

National Institute for International Education. (2017). The 52th Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) II reading.

National Institute for International Education. (2018). The 60th Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) II reading.

Noh, M. Y. (2011). A Study on Use of Cohesive Device of Intermediate Korean Language Learners: based on analysis of oral presentation, Grammar education 14, 181-208.

Noh, M. Y. (2013). A Study on Use of Cohesive Device of Advanced Korean Language Learners - Based on Discourse Analysis of Interview Test -. Journal of Dong-ak Language and Literature, 60, 273-308.

Park, H. J., & Lee, M. H. (2017). Correlation analysis of cohesion and coherence in Korean as a second language student's writing. The Korean Language and Literature, 73, 133-157. https://doi.org/10.18628/urimal.73..201706.133

Seo, P. (2019). A Study on the Selection of Cohesive Devices of Chinese Korean Learners According to Proficiency: Focus on Connective Endings and Conjunctive Adverbs, Journal of Korean Language Education, 30 (1), 91-110.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-15

How to Cite

Bae, M. (2019). THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF COHESIVE DEVICES ON READING COMPREHENSION OF KOREAN LEARNERS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.53.2837