THE SELF-REPORTED INFLUENCE OF USING SMS LANGUAGE IN TEXTING AND SOCIAL MEDIA ON SAUDI STUDENTS' ACADEMIC WRITING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.24582472Keywords:
Acronyms, Textese, Social Media, SMS Language, Texting, Academic Writing, ESLAbstract
SMS language is a form of written English that is often used in informal, computer-mediated communications like texting, online chat, and social media. It is known for shortening many words using acronyms and other forms of abbreviation. SMS language is increasingly well documented in the scholarly literature and its impact on students' formal academic writing is a topic of debate. This study uses a mixed-methods approach to investigate students' perspectives on their own use of SMS language and how it might affect their formal academic writing. The sample was composed of final-year university students who are native Arabic speakers and acquired English as a second language. The data was collected through the use of quantitative questionnaires and supplemented with semi-structured quantitative interviews. The findings revealed that virtually all participants used features of SMS language in their online communications. Still, they struggled to recognize some of the most well-documented, commonly used abbreviations. The interviews showed that time, convenience, and character limits were the primary motivators for students to use SMS language. The findings also indicated that at least some students can recall having made spelling or sentence construction errors in formal academic writing that they attribute to their reliance on SMS language in their digital communications. Further scholarly attention is strongly indicated, and possible directions for future research are described.
References
Alexandrov, A. (2010). Characteristics of single-item measures in Likert scale format. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(1), 1-12.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality progress, 40(7), 64.
Aziz, S., Shamim, M., Aziz, M. F., & Avais, P. (2013). The impact of texting/SMS language on academic writing of students-What do we need to panic about. Elixir Linguistics and Translation, 55(2013), 12884-12890.
Bardo, J. W., & Yeager, S. J. (1982). Note on reliability of fixed-response formats. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54(3_suppl), 1163-1166. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1982.54.3c.1163
Cannon, G. (1989). Abbreviations and acronyms in English word-formation. American Speech, 64(2), 99-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/455038
Croasmun, James T., and Lee Ostrom. "Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences." Journal of Adult Education 40, no. 1 (2011): 19.
EI, W., Arundell, M. J., & Brinker, J. K. (2014). Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids. Aids, 2, 3.
Essoh, N. E. G., & Odey, V. E. (2013). Creativity features of SMS texts in French by Anglophone teachers and learners of the French language. Teaching Literature in Contemporary Education: The National Curriculum for Literature in Cyprus, 2, 79.
Grace, A., Kemp, N., Martin, F. H., & Parrila, R. (2015). Undergraduates’ attitudes to text messaging language use and intrusions of textisms into formal writing. new media & society, 17(5), 792-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813516832
Grange, B., & Bloom, D. A. (2000). Acronyms, abbreviations and initialisms. BJU international, 86(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00717.x
Herring, S. C. (2012). Grammar and electronic communication. in Chappelle, C. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0466
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Levy, S. (2008) If u cn rd this quickly, gd 4 u. Reuters. 10 Dec 2008. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-texting-tech-idUSTRE4B90YA20081210?rpc=64
Mose, N. (2013). SMS linguistic creativity in small screen technology. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(22), 114-121.
Murtiani, R. (2012). The Dynamics of English Language Change from the Old Era to the Digital Age. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v2i1.77
Pasricha, R. B., Pathak, A. P., & English, M. P. (2015). Language vs Lingo: Testing the Dynamics of Txtng. Language in India, 170.
Procházka, O. (2014). Internet Memes–A New Literacy?. Ostrava Journal of English Philology, 6(1).
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.
Thurlow, C. (2007). Fabricating youth: New-media discourse and the technologization of young people. Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies, 213-233.
Varnhagen, C. K., McFall, G. P., Pugh, N., Routledge, L., Sumida-MacDonald, H., & Kwong, T. E. (2010). Lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and writing, 23(6), 719-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y
Verheijen, L. (2013). The effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy. English studies, 94(5), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2013.795737
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.