SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF SECONDARY SCHOOL PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHERS IN MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Arsaythamby Veloo School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Malaysia
  • Hariharan Krishnasamy School of Languages, Civilisation and Philosophy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.21222134

Keywords:

Physical Education Teachers, Secondary School, School-Based Assessment

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the implementation of School-Based Assessment among Physical Education teachers in Malaysian secondary schools. This study was based on the qualitative method using semi-structured interviews. For the purpose of this research, 16 (8 male and 8 female) Physical Education teachers were selected from 4 secondary schools located in Perlis, a state situated along the northern border of Malaysia. These schools are national schools which follow the national curriculum endorsed by the Malaysia Ministry of Education. Furthermore, the schools adopt the co-educational system. Based on the findings, the teachers mentioned that the administrators were not positioning the Physical Education (PE) subject as one of the main subjects in the school curriculum. The teachers have complained that not all of them are specialist teachers whereby most PE teachers in Malaysian secondary schools are not specialist teachers. Time allotment for a PE subject is two 40-minute lessons in a week. In the Malaysian education system, both teaching periods are shared by Physical Education and Health Education respectively. Furthermore, this subject is often debated because it seems to appear as a subject that needs to be taught in the curriculum without having a clear objective. Even though the objectives were already set by the Ministry, this subject remains unpopular because it is not included in the public examination. As a result, more measures need to be taken to ensure that the implementation of Physical Education subject can be of more benefit to the students

References

Atencio, M., Jess, M., & Dewar, K. (2012). It is a case of changing your thought processes, the way you actually teach: Implementing a complex professional learning agenda in Scottish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 127-144.

Buyuknacar, C. (2008). The study of the relationship between emotional competence and professional personality traits of Anatolian and science high school teachers on the basis of students’ perceptions: A case study in Gaziantep (Unpublished master’s thesis, Gaziantep University).

Camlıca, C. (2008). Students studying in secondary school about physical education lesson ideas and expectations: A case study in Ankara (Unpublished master’s thesis, Selcuk University).

Christensen, D. (1996). The Professional Knowledge-Research Base For Teacher Education”. In: J. Sikula, Th.J. Battery & E. Guyton (Eds.). Handbook Of Research On Teacher Education (Pp. 38-52). New York: Prentice Hall.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Washington, D.C.:Stanford University.

Eken, D. (2008). Secondary students’ thought and expectations about physical education classes (Unpublished master’s thesis, Selcuk University).

Erdal, D. (2015). Students’ Evaluation of Professional Personality Competencies of Physical Education Teachers Working in High Schools. US-China Education Review A, 5 (2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.02.008

Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569

Gullu, M. (2007). Investigating secondary school students’ attitudes toward physical education classes (Ph.D. dissertation, Gazi University).

Koláčková, L., & Šikolová, M. (2017). Language tests and their role in society. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 465 – 471.

Marzita Abdullah (2002). Naik Pangkat – Pengalaman Perlu Jadi Sandaran. Utusan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publisher & Distributor Sdn. Bhd.

Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject matter preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5

Pill, S. (2004). Quality learning in physical education. Active & Healthy Magazine, 11 (3), 13- 14.

Ministry of Education (1999). Syllabus of primary and secondary school: Physical Education. Curriculum Development Centre. Kuala Lumpur.

Robinson, S. (2007). Response to Education School Teachers. Washington DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

Ruzlan Md-Ali, & Arsaythamby, V. (2017). Chapter 5: Teachers’ Autonomy and Accountability in Assessing Students’ Physical Education in School-Based Assessment. Ismail Hussein Amzat and Nena P. V., in Teachers Empowerment Towards Professional Development and Practices: Perspectives Across Border. Springer, Singapore.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Stronge, J. H. (2007) . Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, V. A.; ASCD

Sun, H. (2012). Exergaming impact on physical activity and interest in elementary school children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 83 (2), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599852

Tannehil, D., & Zekrajsek, D. (1993). Student attitudes toward physical education: A multicultural study. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 13, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.13.1.78

Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202

Unlu, H., Sunbul, M. A., & Aydos, L. (2008). Physical education teachers’ competence and the validity-relibility study. Journal of Education Faculty of Ahi Evren University, 9(2), 23 -33

Wan Azlan Wan Ismail & Tajul Arifin Muhamad.(2015). Hubungan Faktor Penghalang Terhadap Penglibatan Pelajar dalam Pendidikan Jasmani di Sekolah Menengah. Pg 22- 29

Wan Yasima (1998). Analisa gaya pembuatan keputsan pentadbir di Sek.Men. Sultan Abdul Halim dan Sekolah Menengah Jitra, Jitra , Kedah Darul Aman. Bahan Tidak Bercetak Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.81

Zainal Abidin Zainuddin & Shafezan Hamidi Abdul Hamid. (2010). Persepsi guru-guru pendidikan jasmani terhadap pelaksanaan ujian stardard kecergasan fizikal kebangsaan untuk murid sekolah Malaysia (SEGAK) di sekitar Bandar Johor Bharu dan bandar Skudai. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Zainun Ishak. (1995). Pengajaran pendidikan jasmani KBSM: sejauh mana keberkesanannya? Masalah pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-01

How to Cite

Veloo, A., & Krishnasamy, H. (2017). SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF SECONDARY SCHOOL PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHERS IN MALAYSIA. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 2122–2134. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.21222134