THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ‘BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE SYSTEM’ IN LEARNING DISCUSSION TEXT

Authors

  • Meri Kristina Siallagan SMA Unggul Del, North Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.17071723

Keywords:

Discussion Text, British Parliamentary Debate, Opposition, Proposition

Abstract

Current curriculum requires that teaching-learning process should be able to stimulate students’ critical thinking. In order to achieve the goal, teachers are expected to find and design a learning method where the students will participate in class discussion. Consequently, teacher initiates a study which attempts to reveal the implementation of British Parliamentary Debate System in learning discussion text for grade XII in SMA Unggul Del. This study design is based on speaking experiment where students in a team will be separated in government (proposition) side and opposition’s side. The researcher is using qualitative data to make sure that British Parliamentary Debate is totally beneficial for the students to enhance their arguments for two perspectives as discussion text mean to be. The result is British Parliamentary Debate is compatible with discussion text as it evaluates matter from different perspectives. Thus, based on the findings, the researcher strongly recommends British Parliamentary Debate to evaluate students’ speaking skills. Furthermore, through this implementation, students are expected to be more critical in building their knowledge and opinions. Further research is expected to broaden the scope not only for senior high scool students.

References

Agustina, L & Bahrani. (2016). The Implementation of British Parliamentary Debate in Mulawarman Debate Society (MDS). Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.6

Alasmari, A & Ahmed, S. (2013). Using Debate in EFL Classes. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 147 - 152.

Amanda.H. (2014). Increasing Student Talk.TESOL Connections.

Ary, Donald et al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th Edition). Belmont:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Branham.R. and Meany.J. (1998). Parliamentary Debate.

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design. (4th ed.). United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching Writing (Developing Critical Thinking). Bandung, Indonesia: Rizqi Press.

Firmansyah.E.(2015). A Study on the principles’and English teachers’ perceptions about curriculum 2013 and its implementation. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Green.S.C, Klug.G.H.(2015). Teaching Critical Thinking and Writing Through Debates: An Experimental Evaluation. Teaching Sociology. University of Wisconsin.

Harvey. N, Smith. (2011). The Practical Guide to Debating. International Debate Education Association. New York: IDEBATE Press.

Khotari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology (Methods and Techniques) . (2nd revised edition ed.). New Delhi: New Age International (P)Ltd.

Lai, Emily.R. (2011). Research Report. Critical Thinking: A literature review. Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-11-0063 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2010.09.002

Somjai. S and Jansem (2015).The Use of Debate Technique to Develop Speaking Ability of Grade Ten Students at Bodindecha School. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications; Issue 13.pp 27-31.

Thornbury. S. How to Teach Speaking. Vermont: Longman.

The Cambridge Union Society Introductory Guide to Debating. (2013).

Yang, C & Rusli, E. (2012). Using Debate As A Pedagogical Tool In Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers‟ Learning And Critical Thinking. Journal of International Education Research, 8(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v8i2.6833

Downloads

Published

2017-10-27

How to Cite

Siallagan, M. K. (2017). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ‘BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE SYSTEM’ IN LEARNING DISCUSSION TEXT. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1707–1723. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.17071723