TAX ASSIGNMENT IN SELECTED FEDERATIONS: LESSONS FOR NEPAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.510526Keywords:
Tax Assignment, Federal Government, State Government, Local Government, Income Tax, VAT, Excise Duty, Custom DutyAbstract
The Constitution of Nepal promulgated on September 20, 2015 has transformed the country from the unitary system of governance to a federal democratic republic. The constitution has provisioned the powers and responsibilities to the federal, state, and local governments under the schedule 5, 6 and 8 respectively. However, it has provisioned the concurrent powers of the federation and State under the schedule 7 and federation, state and local level under the schedule 9. The objective of this article is to review the revenue assignment modality provisioned in the present constitution and to suggest for further amendment based on the international practices and national need. Regarding the issue, the paper suggests that- besides the existing provision of constitution, payroll tax should be assigned to the state governments and excise duties (Licence Fee) on alcoholic beverage and tobacco at consumption level should be collected by the sub national governments after their legal and institutional setup and enhancing their capacity of tax administration. This can be helpful in order to reduce vertical fiscal imbalances. Furthermore, Value Added Tax (VAT) should be collected at both the federal and state levels concurrently in future after developing the revenue mobilization capacity of the state governments which also contributes to minimize the vertical fiscal imbalance. In future, the state and local governments should also explore the additional tax bases.JEL Classification: H21, H22, H23, H24, H25
References
AG (2017). About government: cross government bodies; government and parliament; states, territories and local government, Australian Government. Retrieved 11 July 2017 from: http://www.australia.gov.au/about-government/states-territories-and-local-government
Agegneh, A. & Ayele B. (2015). Tax Assignment: Theory Nexus Practice in Australia, Canada, Germany, Ethiopia and Switzerland: Review, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.6, No.7
Ambrosanio, M. F. & Massimo B. (2006). Normative Versus Positive Theories of Revenue Assignments in Federations. In Ehtisham A. & Giorgio B. (eds.) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515.00021
Bardhan, P. (2006). Decentralization and Development. In Ehtisham A. & Giorgio B. (eds.) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515.00016
BG (2017). Brazil Gov News-Presidency of the Republic of Brazil: How the structure of the Brazilian State works, Brazilian Government. Retrieved 25 June 2017 from http://www.brazilgovnews.gov.br/federal-government/state-structure
Bird, R. M. (2002). Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: Universal Principles, Local Applications. In Rao M. G. (ed.) Development, Poverty and Fiscal Policy: Decentralization of Institutions, New Delhi: Oxford University Press
Bird, R. M. (2010). Subnational Taxation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature, Policy Research Working Paper 5450, The World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, Economic Policy and Debt Department.
Boadway, R. & Shah A. (2009). Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multi order Governance: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626883
CBEC (2017). GST: Goods and service tax, Central Board of Excise and Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Retrieved 3 August 2017 from http://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-cbec/gst/index
Dafflon, B. (2006). The Assignment of Functions to Decentralized Government: from Theory to Practice. In Ehtisham A. & Giorgio B. (eds.) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515.00020
Ekpo, A. (2007). Federal Republic of Nigeria. In Shah, A. (ed.). The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, McGill-Queen’s University Press
FBR GoP (2014). FBR quarterly review Vol. 13 No. 1 July September 2013-14: a review of resource mobilization efforts of federal board of revenue, Federal Board of Revenue, Government of Pakistan. Retrieved 4 May 2017 from http://download1.fbr.gov.pk/Docs/201312201612364320July-Sept2013-14.pdf
FC (2017). The Swiss political system, The Federal Council, The Portal of the Swiss Government. Retrieved 15 June 2017 from https://www.ch.ch/en/demokratie/federalism/separation-of-powers
Feld, L. P. & Hagen, J. V. (2007). Federal Republic of Germany. In Shah, A. (ed.). The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, McGill-Queen’s University Press
FGoG (2017). The Federal Government of Germany News, The Federal Government of Germany. Retrieved 12 August 2017 from https://www.bundesregierung.de/SiteGlobals/Forms/Webs/Breg/Suche/EN/News/Nachrichtensuche_formular.html?nn=393308
FRoN (2017). Government tiers: states and local governments, Office of the President, Federal Republic of Nigeria. Retrieved 8 June 2017 from http://www.statehouse.gov.ng/index.php/government/2014-09-25-10-32-25/tiers/states,
GoC (2017). How government works: services and information, Government of Canada. Retrieved 17 July 2017 from https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system.html
GoI (2017). National Portal of India: Know India. Retrieved 5 May 2017 from https://india.gov.in/india-glance
GoN (2015). The Constitution of Nepal, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal
GoP (2017). Provinces and other administrative areas, Government of Pakistan. Retrieved 12 August 2017 from http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/index.html
Khumalo, B. & Mokate, R. (2007). Republic of South Africa. In Shah, A. (ed.). The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, McGill-Queen’s University Press
Musgrave, R. A. & Musgrave, P. B. (1989). Public Finance in Theory and Practice, Columbus: McGraw-Hill International Edition
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance: New York, McGraw-Hill
Musgrave, R. A. (1985). A Brief History of Fiscal Doctrine. In Musgrave, R. A. (ed.) Handbook of Public Economics, New York: Elsevier https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(85)80004-5
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Oates, W. (2005). Towards A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism, International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349-373, Springer Science, Business Media https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
Prasad, U. S. (2015). Nepal's Fiscal Federalism Model in the New Constitution: Agendas for Amendments, NRB Economic Review, Volume 27 Number 2, pp. 91-108, Kathmandu: Nepal Rastra Bank
Prasad, U. S. (2016). Fiscal Federalism in Nepal, Lambert Academic Publishing
Rao, G. (1997). Indian Fiscal Federalism: Major Issues. In Mundle S. (ed.) Public Finance: Policy issues for India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press
Rao, G. (2006). Fiscal Federalism in Planned Economies. In Ehtisham A. & Giorgio B. (eds.) Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515.00017
Rezende, F. (2007). Federal Republic of Brazil. In Shah, A. (ed.). The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, McGill-Queen’s University Press
SAG (2017). Structure and functions of the South African Government, South African Government. Retrieved 21 July 2017 from http://www.gov.za/node/537988
Schmidheiny, K. (2017). Emerging Lessons from Half a Century of Fiscal Federalism in Switzerland, A key note address given on June 10, 2016 at the annual congress of the Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES) in Lugano
Shah, A. (ed.). (2007). The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives, McGill-Queen’s University Press
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector, New York: W. W. Norton and Company Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 AUTHORS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
