MEASURING LEARNING STYLES AND LEARNING STIMULUS AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

Authors

  • A M Sultana Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Malaysia
  • P. Muthurajan Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Malaysia
  • Amira Nabilah Khairuddin Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.613623

Keywords:

Learning Style, Learning Stimulus, Visual learning styles, Auditory learning styles, Tactile learning styles, Sociological

Abstract

This study examines learning styles and learning stimulus among secondary school students in Malaysia.  A total of 50 students from Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Ungku Aziz, Sabak Bernam in Selangor were interviewed to measure student’s different styles. The adapted version of Dunn and Dunn Learning Styles Inventory were used as in this study.  The findings showed that majority students preferred on grouping learning styles (M=4.07), visual learning styles (M= 3.88), auditory learning styles (M=3.66), individual learning styles (M=3.61) and kinesthetic learning styles (M= 4.07) respectively. Based on the findings, several suggestions have been made to enhance the academic achievement for students. The results of this study provide useful information for teachers and students which are important for the process of learning.

References

Abbas, P. G (2012). Visual, auditory, kinaesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English language teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2 (1).

Bhat, M.A. &Govil, P. (2014). Understanding learning styles of secondary school students in relation to certain variables. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2, 6-1.

Pritchard, A. (2005). Ways of learning: learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Emamipour & Hassan, S, E. (2010). A Comparative Study of learning styles among monolingual (Persian) and bilingual (Turkish-Persian) secondary school students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5, 2419–2422 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.474

Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Jason, M. Donna-Maria, J & Rasheda, M. (2015). Learning Processes and Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students in Barbados. International Journal of Education. 7, 3

Merrifield, J. (1996). Examining the language learning strategies used by French adult learners. MSc degree in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Language Studies Unit .Aston University.

Nivedhitha C.P. & Chetan S.V. (2016). Learning styles among high school, pre-university and degree student. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR). 5 (1): 25-27

Qais, F. (2011). How to Teach Effectively: A Practical Guide. Al-Mehrab e-publisher, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Hoffler, Tim N.; Schwartz, Ruth N. (2011). Effects of Pacing and Cognitive Style across Dynamic and Non- Dynamic Representations, Computers & Education, 57 (2),1716-1726 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.012

Kelly, M. (2010). Learning Styles - Understanding and Using Learning Styles. Retrieved February 25, 2010, from About.com: http://712educators.about.com/od/learningstyles/a/learning_styles. htm?p

Nivedhitha C.P. & Chetan S.V. (2016) . Learning Styles among High School, Pre-University and Degree Students. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) 5, 1

Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21 (1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586356

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584152

Sakalli, M. (2009). The frequent use of teaching strategies/methods among teachers according to the Teacher Candidates Observation. Cypriot, Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 1-8.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-18

How to Cite

Sultana, A., Muthurajan, P., & Khairuddin, A. (2017). MEASURING LEARNING STYLES AND LEARNING STIMULUS AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.613623